Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, Nancy, France.
University Centre for Education by Medical Simulation (CUESiM), Virtual Hospital of Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, Nancy, France.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Sep;36(6):e3313. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3313. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
Patient-centered education improves glycemic control in subjects with type 1 diabetes (T1D). E-health technologies are widely used to support medical decision-making, patient advising or teleconsultations; however, the active participation of a patient is missing. Challenges remain whether e-health education can be effectively incorporated into clinical pathways. The purpose of the study was to examine the effects of e-health education, compared to standard care, on HbA MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search (EMBASE, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and Web of Science) up to February 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Internet-/ mobile application-based educational interventions, with the active involvement of patients, provided in addition to, or substituting usual care in patients with T1D on intensive insulin therapy. The primary outcome was the standardized difference in means (SDM) of HbA change from baseline between intervention and comparator groups.
Eight RCTs involving 757 subjects were included on 6335 screened citations. After excluding two trials with a high risk of bias from the meta-analysis, the HbA change from baseline did not significantly differ between intervention and comparator groups (SDM = -0.154, 95% CI: -0.335 to 0.025; P = 0.01, random-effect model). The number of studies is limited with a relatively short duration. Reporting of educational outcomes was not rigorous.
The effect of e-health educational interventions on HbA in patients with T1D is comparable to the standard care. This review highlights the need for further well-designed RCTs that will investigate the opportunities of incorporating e-health education into clinical pathways.
以患者为中心的教育可改善 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者的血糖控制。电子健康技术被广泛用于支持医疗决策、患者咨询或远程咨询;然而,患者的积极参与却缺失了。电子健康教育是否能有效地纳入临床路径仍存在挑战。本研究旨在比较电子健康教育与标准护理对 T1D 患者强化胰岛素治疗患者的糖化血红蛋白(HbA )的影响。
我们对截止 2018 年 2 月的电子病历(EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane 图书馆和 Web of Science)进行了文献检索,以查找基于互联网/移动应用的教育干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT),这些干预措施需要患者积极参与,除了标准护理之外,还可以替代 T1D 患者的常规护理。主要结局是干预组与对照组之间从基线开始的 HbA 变化的标准化平均差异(SDM)。
共纳入了 8 项 RCT,涉及 757 名患者,对 6335 篇筛选文献进行了排除。在排除了两项偏倚风险较高的试验后,干预组与对照组之间从基线开始的 HbA 变化无显著差异(SDM = -0.154,95%CI:-0.335 至 0.025;P = 0.01,随机效应模型)。研究数量有限,且持续时间相对较短。教育结果的报告不够严谨。
电子健康教育干预对 T1D 患者 HbA 的影响与标准护理相当。本综述强调需要进一步设计良好的 RCT,以研究将电子健康教育纳入临床路径的机会。