The University of Western Ontario.
University of Toronto.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020 Dec;91(4):640-651. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1696928. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
: To compare the effects of a set of 12-30 min, maximal effort, constant load cycle bouts (HICT) to 12 short work: shorter rest (10 s: 5 s) interval sessions (INT) of similar duration and effort, performed on alternate days over 4 weeks, on performance and V̇O lmin. INT sessions consisted of repeated cycles of 10 s work followed by 5 s of recovery for 30 min. Fourteen male athletes (83 kg ± 6, 24year ± 2) were randomly assigned to HICT (n = 7) or INT (n = 7) training. Pre- and post-power output (PO), V̇O and V̇O, during 60s, 3 min, and ramp (RAMP) tests were collected : Between group comparisons showed increased mean PO, pre- to post-INT training ( = .026) over the last min of the 3-min test whereas PO post-HICT training declined. INT showed greater training effects on the 60 s test than HCIT (INT 506 ± 45 to 535 ± 55 W; = .002, Cd = .57; HCIT 513 ± 78 to 548 ± 83 W; = .02, Cd = 27). RAMP peak PO and V̇O increased within both groups (INT 341 ± 63 to 370 ± 48 W, = .002, Cd = 0.52; HICT 332 ± 45 to 353 ± 44 W, = .006, Cd = .53; 3.73 ± 0.68 to 4.06 ± 0.63 L·min, = .001, Cd = .50; 3.75 ± 0.62 to 4.09 ± 0.52 L·min, = .002, Cd = .59). : These results show that utilizing this novel short work: shorter rest (10 s: 5 s) interval training paradigm will elicit better performances in moderate duration performances compared to continuous training of the same duration, effort, and frequency.
将 12-30 分钟、最大努力、恒定负荷周期(HICT)与 12 个短工作:较短休息(10 秒:5 秒)间隔(INT)进行比较,在 4 周内交替进行,类似的持续时间和努力,对性能和 V̇O lmin 进行比较。INT 课程由 10 秒的工作和 5 秒的恢复组成,持续 30 分钟。14 名男性运动员(83 公斤±6,24 岁±2)被随机分配到 HICT(n = 7)或 INT(n = 7)训练。在 60 秒、3 分钟和斜坡(RAMP)测试前和后收集功率输出(PO)、V̇O 和 V̇O:组间比较显示,在 3 分钟测试的最后 1 分钟,INT 训练后平均 PO 增加( =.026),而 HICT 训练后 PO 下降。INT 在 60 秒测试上的训练效果大于 HCIT(INT 506±45 至 535±55 W; =.002,Cd =.57;HCIT 513±78 至 548±83 W; =.02,Cd = 27)。INT 和 HICT 两组的 RAMP 峰值 PO 和 V̇O 均增加(INT 341±63 至 370±48 W, =.002,Cd = 0.52;HICT 332±45 至 353±44 W, =.006,Cd =.53;3.73±0.68 至 4.06±0.63 L·min, =.001,Cd =.50;3.75±0.62 至 4.09±0.52 L·min, =.002,Cd =.59)。这些结果表明,利用这种新颖的短工作:较短休息(10 秒:5 秒)间隔训练模式,与相同持续时间、努力和频率的连续训练相比,在中等持续时间的表现中会产生更好的表现。