• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔种植术中的动态导航:手术经验对种植体植入精度和手术时间的影响。一项体外研究。

Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Division, DIBINEM, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.

Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental Clinic, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41125 Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062153.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17062153
PMID:32213873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7142455/
Abstract

AIM

the aim of this in vitro study was to test whether the implant placement accuracy and the operating time can be influenced by the operator's experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

sixteen models underwent a (Cone Beam Computer Tomography) CBCT and implant positioning was digitally planned on this. The models were randomly assigned to four operators with different levels of surgical experience. One hundred and twelve implant sites were drilled using a dynamic navigation system and operating times were measured. Based on postoperative CBCTs, dental implants were virtually inserted and superimposed over the planned ones. Two-dimensional and 3D deviations between planned and virtually inserted implants were measured at the entry point and at the apical point. Angular and vertical errors were also calculated.

RESULTS

considering coronal and apical 3D deviations, no statistically significant differences were found between the four operators ( = 0.27; = 0.06). Some vectorial components of the deviation at the apical point and the angular errors of some operators differed from each other.

CONCLUSIONS

within the limitations of this study, dynamic navigation can be considered a reliable technique both for experienced and novice clinicians.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在测试操作人员的经验是否会影响种植体植入的准确性和手术时间。

材料与方法

16 个模型进行了(锥形束 CT)CBCT 检查,并在此基础上进行了数字化种植体定位。将模型随机分配给 4 名具有不同手术经验水平的操作人员。使用动态导航系统钻 112 个种植体,并测量手术时间。基于术后 CBCT,虚拟插入种植体并与计划种植体进行叠加。在入口点和根尖点测量计划种植体和虚拟插入种植体之间的二维和三维偏差。还计算了角度和垂直误差。

结果

考虑到冠部和根尖部的三维偏差,4 名操作人员之间没有统计学上的显著差异( = 0.27; = 0.06)。一些操作人员根尖部的偏差向量成分和角度误差存在差异。

结论

在本研究的限制范围内,动态导航可以被认为是一种可靠的技术,无论是对于经验丰富的临床医生还是新手医生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/31163d0bec47/ijerph-17-02153-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/195653bae4f9/ijerph-17-02153-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/6a7284dc8523/ijerph-17-02153-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/48312343b042/ijerph-17-02153-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/40b7a35440c4/ijerph-17-02153-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/31163d0bec47/ijerph-17-02153-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/195653bae4f9/ijerph-17-02153-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/6a7284dc8523/ijerph-17-02153-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/48312343b042/ijerph-17-02153-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/40b7a35440c4/ijerph-17-02153-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef0a/7142455/31163d0bec47/ijerph-17-02153-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study.口腔种植术中的动态导航:手术经验对种植体植入精度和手术时间的影响。一项体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062153.
2
Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.计算机辅助静态和动态导航系统在颧骨牙科种植体植入中的准确性。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Mar 15;23(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02856-9.
3
Accuracy of dynamic implant navigation surgery performed by a novice operator.新手操作者行动态植入物导航手术的准确性。
Int J Comput Dent. 2022 Nov 25;25(4):377-385. doi: 10.3290/j.ijcd.b2588207.
4
Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.术者经验对应用立体光刻手术模板种植体植入精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):248-54. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60053-0.
5
Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.使用基于增强现实的导航、静态计算机辅助种植手术和徒手方法进行牙种植体植入的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2022 Apr;119:104070. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104070. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Accuracy of Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation Compared to Computer-Aided Static Navigation for Dental Implant Placement: An In Vitro Study.与计算机辅助静态导航相比,计算机辅助动态导航在牙种植体植入中的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 2;8(12):2123. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122123.
7
Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.两种不同的动态导航系统注册方法在牙种植体植入术中准确性的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):352-360. doi: 10.1111/cid.13090. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: A comparison of operator experience.计算机辅助手术的准确性:操作者经验的比较
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):407-13. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
9
Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.私人诊所中动态牙种植导航系统的准确性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):205–213. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6966. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
10
Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation.动态导航在单牙间隙种植中的应用:一项临床前初步研究。
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104265. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104265. Epub 2022 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the operator's generational cohort influence the accuracy of orthodontic miniscrews insertion in the palatine vault in dynamic computer-guided surgery? A randomized prospective study.在动态计算机引导手术中,操作者的代际群组是否会影响腭穹窿正畸微螺钉植入的准确性?一项随机前瞻性研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jun 10;29(1):120. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01414-7.
2
Evaluation of the Accuracy, Surgical Time, and Learning Curve of Freehand, Static, and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery in an In Vitro Study.体外研究中徒手、静态和动态计算机辅助种植手术的准确性、手术时间及学习曲线评估
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 May;36(5):555-565. doi: 10.1111/clr.14403. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring training dental implant placement using computer-guided implant navigation system for predoctoral students: A pilot study.探讨使用计算机引导种植导航系统对牙科学预科学生进行种植体植入培训:一项初步研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Nov;23(4):415-423. doi: 10.1111/eje.12447. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
2
Accuracy and the role of experience in dynamic computer guided dental implant surgery: An in-vitro study.动态计算机引导下牙种植手术的准确性及经验的作用:一项体外研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Jan 1;24(1):e76-e83. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22785.
3
Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.
Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology.
牙种植学中的动态导航
Discoveries (Craiova). 2023 Dec 31;11(4):e178. doi: 10.15190/d.2023.17. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
4
Application of dynamic navigation technology in oral and maxillofacial surgery.动态导航技术在口腔颌面外科中的应用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Dec 13;29(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06098-z.
5
Accuracy of dynamic navigation compared to static surgical guides and the freehand approach in implant placement: a prospective clinical study.动态导航与静态手术导板和徒手植入方法在种植体植入中的准确性比较:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Head Face Med. 2024 May 14;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13005-024-00433-1.
6
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement with Dynamic Navigation-Investigation of the Influence of Two Different Optical Reference Systems: A Randomized Clinical Trial.动态导航下牙种植体植入的准确性——两种不同光学参考系统影响的研究:一项随机临床试验
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Feb 4;11(2):155. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11020155.
7
Case report and literature review: autonomous robotic system assisted palatal implantation at an anterior teeth site compromised by periapical cyst.病例报告与文献综述:自主机器人系统辅助在前牙区根尖囊肿累及部位进行腭部种植
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 15;11:1335043. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1335043. eCollection 2024.
8
Analysis of the accuracy of a dynamic navigation system when performing dental implant surgery with transcrestal sinus floor elevation: A pilot study.经牙槽嵴顶窦底提升进行牙种植手术时动态导航系统准确性的分析:一项初步研究。
J Dent Sci. 2023 Oct;18(4):1747-1755. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.12.014. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
9
Accuracy of Zygomatic Implant Placement Using a Full Digital Planning and Custom-Made Bone-Supported Guide: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.使用全数字规划和定制骨支持导板进行颧骨种植体植入的准确性:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2023 May 4;11(5):123. doi: 10.3390/dj11050123.
10
Proposal and Validation of a New Nonradiological Method for Postoperative Three-Dimensional Implant Position Analysis Based on the Dynamic Navigation System: An In Vitro Study.基于动态导航系统的术后三维种植体位置分析新非放射学方法的提出与验证:一项体外研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020362.
私人诊所中动态牙种植导航系统的准确性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):205–213. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6966. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
4
Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future.牙科种植导航系统引领未来手术。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018 Jan;34(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.011. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
5
Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: a critical review based on randomized controlled trials.引导式种植手术的临床应用与有效性:基于随机对照试验的批判性综述
BMC Oral Health. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y.
6
Reliability of a CAD/CAM Surgical Guide for Implant Placement: An In Vitro Comparison of Surgeons' Experience Levels and Implant Sites.用于种植体植入的计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造手术导板的可靠性:外科医生经验水平与种植部位的体外比较
Int J Prosthodont. 2017 Jul/Aug;30(4):367-169. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5179.
7
Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies.计算机辅助手术中种植体植入的准确性:一项比较尸体研究、临床研究和体外研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101–115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation.使用动态导航进行种植体植入更精确。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;75(7):1377-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
9
How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study.引导式种植手术经验在准确性方面起到多大作用?一项随机对照试验性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jul;46(7):922-930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.03.010. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance.种植体植入的静态或动态导航——选择引导方法
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30.