• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于动态导航系统的术后三维种植体位置分析新非放射学方法的提出与验证:一项体外研究

Proposal and Validation of a New Nonradiological Method for Postoperative Three-Dimensional Implant Position Analysis Based on the Dynamic Navigation System: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Ma Feifei, Liu Mingyue, Liu Xiaoqiang, Wei Tai, Liu Lilan, Sun Feng

机构信息

First Clinical Division, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100034, China.

Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020362.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13020362
PMID:36836596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9960986/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To propose a novel, radiation-free method for postoperative three-dimensional (3D) position analysis of dental implants based on the dynamic navigation system (DNS) and evaluate its accuracy in vitro.

METHODS

A total of 60 implants were digitally planned and then placed in the standardized plastic models with a single-tooth gap and a free-end gap under the guidance of the DNS. Postoperative 3D positions of the inserted implants were evaluated using specially designed navigation-based software, and its datasets were superimposed onto those of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for accuracy analyses. Deviations at the coronal, apical, and angular levels were measured and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean 3D deviation was 0.88 ± 0.37 mm at the entry point and 1.02 ± 0.35 mm at the apex point. The mean angular deviation was 1.83 ± 0.79 degrees. No significant differences were noted in the deviations between implants placed in the single-tooth gap and the free-end situation ( > 0.05) or between different tooth positions at distal extensions ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This non-radiographic method provides facile, efficient, and reliable postoperative implant position evaluation and may be a potential substitute for CBCT, particularly for implants placed under the guidance of dynamic navigation.

摘要

目的

提出一种基于动态导航系统(DNS)的新型无辐射方法,用于牙种植体术后三维(3D)位置分析,并在体外评估其准确性。

方法

共对60颗种植体进行数字化规划,然后在DNS引导下将其植入具有单牙间隙和游离端间隙的标准化塑料模型中。使用专门设计的基于导航的软件评估植入种植体的术后三维位置,并将其数据集与锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的数据集进行叠加以进行准确性分析。测量并统计分析冠状、根尖和角度水平的偏差。

结果

入口点的平均三维偏差为0.88±0.37mm,根尖点为1.02±0.35mm。平均角度偏差为1.83±0.79度。单牙间隙和游离端情况下植入的种植体之间的偏差(>0.05)或远端延伸处不同牙位之间的偏差(>0.05)均无显著差异。

结论

这种非放射学方法为术后种植体位置评估提供了简便、高效且可靠的方法,可能是CBCT的潜在替代方法,特别是对于在动态导航引导下植入的种植体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/9f67ce2c16d0/jpm-13-00362-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/d32d018aa90b/jpm-13-00362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/66bba3ad4f87/jpm-13-00362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/52ac38ebf199/jpm-13-00362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/0233f59c92ae/jpm-13-00362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/6c4d363bbcd2/jpm-13-00362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/c4facc08aa57/jpm-13-00362-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/79ebef304144/jpm-13-00362-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/9f67ce2c16d0/jpm-13-00362-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/d32d018aa90b/jpm-13-00362-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/66bba3ad4f87/jpm-13-00362-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/52ac38ebf199/jpm-13-00362-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/0233f59c92ae/jpm-13-00362-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/6c4d363bbcd2/jpm-13-00362-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/c4facc08aa57/jpm-13-00362-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/79ebef304144/jpm-13-00362-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa7d/9960986/9f67ce2c16d0/jpm-13-00362-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Proposal and Validation of a New Nonradiological Method for Postoperative Three-Dimensional Implant Position Analysis Based on the Dynamic Navigation System: An In Vitro Study.基于动态导航系统的术后三维种植体位置分析新非放射学方法的提出与验证:一项体外研究
J Pers Med. 2023 Feb 18;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020362.
2
Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice.私人诊所中动态牙种植导航系统的准确性
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 January/February;34(1):205–213. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6966. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
3
Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study.口腔种植术中的动态导航:手术经验对种植体植入精度和手术时间的影响。一项体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062153.
4
Dynamic navigation for dental implant placement in single-tooth gaps: A preclinical pilot investigation.动态导航在单牙间隙种植中的应用:一项临床前初步研究。
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104265. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104265. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
5
Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.使用基于增强现实的导航、静态计算机辅助种植手术和徒手方法进行牙种植体植入的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Dent. 2022 Apr;119:104070. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104070. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.手术导板固定和种植体位置对静态计算机辅助种植手术精度的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2022 Feb;31(2):155-164. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13371. Epub 2021 May 10.
7
Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.两种不同的动态导航系统注册方法在牙种植体植入术中准确性的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):352-360. doi: 10.1111/cid.13090. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Accuracy of zygomatic dental implant placement using computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems compared with a mixed reality appliance. An in vitro study.使用计算机辅助静态和动态导航系统与混合现实设备进行颧种植体植入的准确性:一项体外研究。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2023 Dec 1;15(12):e1035-e1044. doi: 10.4317/jced.61097. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
Accuracy of a Computer-Aided Dynamic Navigation System in the Placement of Zygomatic Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.计算机辅助动态导航系统在颧部牙种植体植入中的准确性:一项体外研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 5;11(5):1436. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051436.
10
Three-dimensional accuracy of partially guided implant surgery based on dental magnetic resonance imaging.基于口腔磁共振成像的部分引导式种植手术的三维精度。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32(10):1218-1227. doi: 10.1111/clr.13819. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology.牙种植学中的动态导航
Discoveries (Craiova). 2023 Dec 31;11(4):e178. doi: 10.15190/d.2023.17. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.两种不同的动态导航系统注册方法在牙种植体植入术中准确性的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022 Jun;24(3):352-360. doi: 10.1111/cid.13090. Epub 2022 May 10.
2
Accuracy of 3 calibration methods of computer-assisted dynamic navigation for implant placement: An in vitro study.三种计算机辅助动态导航种植体植入精度的校准方法:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Apr;131(4):668-674. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.03.014. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Dynamic Navigation in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
动态导航在种植牙科中的应用:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Sep-Oct;36(5):e121-e140. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8770.
4
Role of Dynamic Navigation Systems in Enhancing the Accuracy of Implant Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Studies.动态导航系统在提高种植体植入精度中的作用:临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;79(10):2061-2070. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
5
Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Dynamic Navigation in Implant Placement with a Fully Digital Approach: A Prospective Clinical Trial.全数字化方法下计算机辅助动态导航在种植体植入中的准确性:一项前瞻性临床试验
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 21;10(9):1808. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091808.
6
Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.动态计算机辅助种植体植入的准确性评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study.口腔内扫描方法与锥形束计算机断层扫描叠加评估种植体计划与实际植入精度的验证:一项随机体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 14;17(24):9358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249358.
8
Accuracy of dynamic navigation in implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.动态导航在种植手术中的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Apr;32(4):383-393. doi: 10.1111/clr.13719. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Dynamic Navigation in Dental Implantology: The Influence of Surgical Experience on Implant Placement Accuracy and Operating Time. An in Vitro Study.口腔种植术中的动态导航:手术经验对种植体植入精度和手术时间的影响。一项体外研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 24;17(6):2153. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062153.
10
Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.经动态导航或徒手方法放置牙种植体的准确性:一项分口随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):255-263. doi: 10.1111/clr.13563. Epub 2019 Dec 29.