Ahmed W, Gyawali P, Toze S
CSIRO Land and Water, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Brisbane, Qld 4102 Australia.
2School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston Road, Brisbane, Qld 4006 Australia.
Water Air Soil Pollut. 2016;227(9):327. doi: 10.1007/s11270-016-3026-5. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
Pathogenic human viruses cause over half of gastroenteritis cases associated with recreational water use worldwide. They are difficult to concentrate from environmental waters due to low numbers and small sizes. Rapid enumeration of viruses by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) has the potential to improve water quality analysis and risk assessment. However, capturing and recovering these viruses from environmental water remain formidable barriers to routine use. Here, we compared the recovery efficiencies of human adenoviruses (HAdVs) and human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) from 10-L river water samples seeded with raw human wastewater (100 and 10 mL) using hollow-fiber ultrafiltration (HFUF) and glass wool filter (GWF) methods. The mean recovery efficiencies of HAdVs in river water samples through HFUF were 36 and 86 % for 100 and 10 mL of seeded human wastewater, respectively. In contrast, the estimated mean recovery efficiencies of HAdVs in river water samples through GWF were 1.3 and 3 % for 100 and 10 mL seeded raw human wastewater, respectively. Similar trends were also observed for HPyVs. Recovery efficiencies of HFUF method were significantly higher ( < 0.05) than GWF for both HAdVs and HPyVs. Our results clearly suggest that HFUF would be a preferred method for concentrating HAdVs and HPyVs from river water followed by subsequent detection and quantification with PCR/qPCR assays.
致病性人类病毒导致了全球范围内超过一半与娱乐用水相关的肠胃炎病例。由于其数量少且体积小,很难从环境水体中浓缩出来。通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)对病毒进行快速计数,有潜力改善水质分析和风险评估。然而,从环境水体中捕获和回收这些病毒仍然是常规应用的巨大障碍。在此,我们使用中空纤维超滤(HFUF)和玻璃棉过滤(GWF)方法,比较了从接种了原人类废水(100毫升和10毫升)的10升河水样本中回收人类腺病毒(HAdVs)和人类多瘤病毒(HPyVs)的效率。对于接种了100毫升和10毫升人类废水的河水样本,通过HFUF回收HAdVs的平均效率分别为36%和86%。相比之下,对于接种了100毫升和10毫升原人类废水的河水样本,通过GWF估计回收HAdVs的平均效率分别为1.3%和3%。对于HPyVs也观察到了类似趋势。对于HAdVs和HPyVs,HFUF方法的回收效率均显著高于GWF(<0.05)。我们的结果清楚地表明,HFUF将是从河水中浓缩HAdVs和HPyVs的首选方法,随后可通过PCR/qPCR检测和定量分析。