Suppr超能文献

微创外科手术治疗急性食管和胃癌的安全性和可行性:一项全国性队列研究。

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgical interventions for esophageal and gastric cancer in the acute setting: a nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1219-1229. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07491-x. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy and gastrectomy are increasingly performed and might be superior to their open equivalents in an elective setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether minimally invasive approaches can be safely applied in the acute setting as well.

METHODS

All patients who underwent an acute surgical intervention for primary esophageal or gastric cancer between 2011 and 2017 were identified from the nationwide database of the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA). Conversion rates, postoperative complications, re-interventions, postoperative mortality, hospital stay and oncological outcomes (radical resection rates and median lymph node yield) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2017, surgery for esophagogastric cancer was performed in an acute setting in 2% (190/8861) in The Netherlands. A total of 14 acute resections for esophageal cancer were performed, which included 7 minimally invasive esophagectomies and 7 open esophagectomies. As these numbers were very low, no comparison between minimally invasive and open esophagectomies was made. A total of 122 acute resections for gastric cancer were performed, which included 39 minimally invasive gastrectomies and 83 open gastrectomies. Conversion occurred in 9 patients (23%). Minimally invasive gastrectomy was at least comparable to open gastrectomy regarding postoperative complications (36% versus 51%), median hospital stay (9 days [IQR: 7-16 days] versus 11 days [IQR: 7-17 days]), readmissions (8% versus 11%) and oncological outcomes (radical resection rate: 87% versus 66%, median lymph node yield: 21 [IQR: 15-32 days] versus 16 [IQR: 11-24 days]).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer is safe and feasible in the acute setting, with at least comparable postoperative clinical and short-term oncological outcomes compared to open surgery but a relatively high conversion rate.

摘要

背景

微创食管切除术和胃切除术越来越多地应用于临床,并且在择期手术中可能优于开放手术。本研究旨在评估微创方法在急性情况下是否也能安全应用。

方法

从荷兰上消化道癌症审计(DUCA)的全国数据库中确定了 2011 年至 2017 年间所有因原发性食管或胃癌接受急性外科干预的患者。评估了转化率、术后并发症、再次干预、术后死亡率、住院时间和肿瘤学结果(根治性切除率和中位淋巴结产量)。

结果

2011 年至 2017 年间,荷兰有 2%(190/8861)的患者因食管胃交界部癌行急性手术。共进行了 14 例食管癌的急性切除术,其中包括 7 例微创食管切除术和 7 例开放食管切除术。由于这些数字非常低,因此未对微创与开放食管切除术进行比较。共进行了 122 例胃癌的急性切除术,其中包括 39 例微创胃切除术和 83 例开放胃切除术。有 9 例(23%)患者发生转化。微创胃切除术在术后并发症(36%与 51%)、中位住院时间(9 天[IQR:7-16 天]与 11 天[IQR:7-17 天])、再入院率(8%与 11%)和肿瘤学结果(根治性切除率:87%与 66%,中位淋巴结产量:21[IQR:15-32 天]与 16[IQR:11-24 天])方面至少与开放手术相当。

结论

微创胃癌手术在急性情况下是安全可行的,与开放手术相比至少具有相似的术后临床和短期肿瘤学结果,但转化率相对较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08cc/7886730/5dbd6ffccc1a/464_2020_7491_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验