Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Departments of Medicine and Neurology, University of Melbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ann Neurol. 2020 Jun;87(6):897-906. doi: 10.1002/ana.25724. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
The mechanisms by which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) cause birth defects (BDs) are unknown. Data suggest that AED-induced BDs may result from a genome-wide increase of de novo variants in the embryo, a mechanism that we investigated.
Whole exome sequencing data from child-parent trios were interrogated for de novo single-nucleotide variants/indels (dnSNVs/indels) and de novo copy number variants (dnCNVs). Generalized linear models were applied to assess de novo variant burdens in children exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-exposed children) versus children without BDs not exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-unexposed unaffected children), and AED-exposed children with BDs versus those without BDs, adjusting for confounders. Fisher exact test was used to compare categorical data.
Sixty-seven child-parent trios were included: 10 with AED-exposed children with BDs, 46 with AED-exposed unaffected children, and 11 with AED-unexposed unaffected children. The dnSNV/indel burden did not differ between AED-exposed children and AED-unexposed unaffected children (median dnSNV/indel number/child [range] = 3 [0-7] vs 3 [1-5], p = 0.50). Among AED-exposed children, there were no significant differences between those with BDs and those unaffected. Likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels were detected in 9 of 67 (13%) children, none of whom had BDs. The proportion of cases harboring likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels did not differ significantly between AED-unexposed and AED-exposed children. The dnCNV burden was not associated with AED exposure or birth outcome.
Our study indicates that prenatal AED exposure does not increase the burden of de novo variants, and that this mechanism is not a major contributor to AED-induced BDs. These results can be incorporated in routine patient counseling. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:897-906.
抗癫痫药物(AEDs)导致出生缺陷(BDs)的机制尚不清楚。有数据表明,AED 诱导的 BDs 可能是由于胚胎中全基因组新出现的变异增加所致,我们对此机制进行了研究。
对来自儿童-父母三体型的全外显子测序数据进行新出现的单核苷酸变异/插入(dnSNVs/indels)和新出现的拷贝数变异(dnCNVs)检测。应用广义线性模型评估暴露于产前 AED 的儿童(AED 暴露儿童)与未暴露于产前 AED 的无 BDs 的儿童(AED 未暴露无影响儿童)以及 AED 暴露有 BDs 的儿童与无 BDs 的儿童之间的新出现的变异负担,并对混杂因素进行了调整。采用 Fisher 确切检验比较分类数据。
共纳入 67 个儿童-父母三体型:10 个 AED 暴露有 BDs 的儿童,46 个 AED 暴露无影响的儿童,11 个 AED 未暴露无影响的儿童。AED 暴露儿童与 AED 未暴露无影响儿童的 dnSNV/indel 负担无差异(儿童中位数 dnSNV/indel 数量/儿童[范围]=3[0-7]比 3[1-5],p=0.50)。在 AED 暴露儿童中,有 BDs 的儿童与无影响的儿童之间无显著差异。在 67 个儿童中检测到 9 个(13%)可能具有致病性的 dnSNVs/indels,这些儿童均无 BDs。AED 未暴露与 AED 暴露儿童中携带可能具有致病性的 dnSNVs/indels 的病例比例无显著差异。dnCNV 负担与 AED 暴露或出生结局无关。
本研究表明,产前 AED 暴露不会增加新出现的变异负担,且该机制不是 AED 诱导 BDs 的主要原因。这些结果可纳入常规患者咨询中。