Wen Xuerong, Hartzema Abraham, Delaney Joseph A, Brumback Babette, Liu Xuefeng, Egerman Robert, Roth Jeffrey, Segal Rich, Meador Kimford J
Health Outcomes, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, 7 Greenhouse Rd., Kingston, RI, 02881, USA.
Department of Pharmaceutical Outcome and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 6;17(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1190-7.
Application of latent variable models in medical research are becoming increasingly popular. A latent trait model is developed to combine rare birth defect outcomes in an index of infant morbidity.
This study employed four statewide, retrospective 10-year data sources (1999 to 2009). The study cohort consisted of all female Florida Medicaid enrollees who delivered a live singleton infant during study period. Drug exposure was defined as any exposure to Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy. Mothers with no AED exposure served as the AED unexposed group for comparison. Four adverse outcomes, birth defect (BD), abnormal condition of new born (ACNB), low birth weight (LBW), and pregnancy and obstetrical complication (PCOC), were examined and combined using a latent trait model to generate an overall severity index. Unidimentionality, local independence, internal homogeneity, and construct validity were evaluated for the combined outcome.
The study cohort consisted of 3183 mother-infant pairs in total AED group, 226 in the valproate only subgroup, and 43,956 in the AED unexposed group. Compared to AED unexposed group, the rate of BD was higher in both the total AED group (12.8% vs. 10.5%, P < .0001), and the valproate only subgroup (19.6% vs. 10.5%, P < .0001). The combined outcome was significantly correlated with the length of hospital stay during delivery in both the total AED group (Rho = 0.24, P < .0001) and the valproate only subgroup (Rho = 0.16, P = .01). The mean score for the combined outcome in the total AED group was significantly higher (2.04 ± 0.02 vs. 1.88 ± 0.01, P < .0001) than AED unexposed group, whereas the valproate only subgroup was not.
Latent trait modeling can be an effective tool for combining adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes to assess prenatal exposure to AED, but evaluation of the selected components is essential to ensure the validity of the combined outcome.
潜在变量模型在医学研究中的应用越来越普遍。开发了一种潜在特征模型,以将罕见的出生缺陷结果纳入婴儿发病率指数。
本研究采用了四个全州范围的、为期10年的回顾性数据源(1999年至2009年)。研究队列包括在研究期间分娩单胎活婴的所有佛罗里达州医疗补助女性参保者。药物暴露定义为孕期任何抗癫痫药物(AED)暴露。无AED暴露的母亲作为AED未暴露组用于比较。检查了四种不良结局,即出生缺陷(BD)、新生儿异常情况(ACNB)、低出生体重(LBW)以及妊娠和产科并发症(PCOC),并使用潜在特征模型将其合并以生成总体严重程度指数。对合并结局评估了单维性、局部独立性、内部同质性和结构效度。
研究队列中,AED总暴露组共有3183对母婴,丙戊酸盐单独暴露亚组有226对,AED未暴露组有43956对。与AED未暴露组相比,AED总暴露组(12.8%对10.5%,P < .0001)和丙戊酸盐单独暴露亚组(19.6%对10.5%,P < .0001)的BD发生率均更高。在AED总暴露组(Rho = 0.24,P < .0001)和丙戊酸盐单独暴露亚组(Rho = 0.16,P = .01)中,合并结局与分娩期间住院时间均显著相关。AED总暴露组合并结局的平均得分显著高于AED未暴露组(2.04 ± 0.02对1.88 ± 0.01,P < .0001),而丙戊酸盐单独暴露亚组则不然。
潜在特征建模可以是一种有效的工具,用于合并不良妊娠和围产期结局以评估产前AED暴露,但对所选组成部分的评估对于确保合并结局的有效性至关重要。