• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声引导激光消融与微波消融治疗单发甲状腺微小乳头状癌的回顾性研究。

Ultrasound-Guided Laser Ablation Versus Microwave Ablation for Patients With Unifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Rui Jin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 197 Ruijin 2 Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Nov;52(9):855-862. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23238. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1002/lsm.23238
PMID:32216112
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and the safety of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) and laser ablation (LA) for the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).

STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 67 patients with unifocal PTMC were studied retrospectively, including 33 cases who underwent MWA (MWA group) and 34 cases who received LA (LA group). The follow-up consisted of thyroid function tests, ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS), and chest X-ray or computed tomography scan. The treatment response and complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The follow-up time for the MWA and LA group was 23.3 ± 4.4 and 22.8 ± 4.1 months, respectively. All the ablations were successfully performed as planned without complementary ablations, and it was confirmed by CEUS after treatment in both groups. It was observed that, at the last follow-up, the mean largest diameter decreased from 5.0 ± 1.4 mm to 0.1 ± 0.4 mm (MWA group) and from 4.5 ± 1.6 mm to 0.6 ± 1.2 mm(LA group) (P < 0.05 for both). The average volume reduced from 51.9 ± 40.8 to 0.2 ± 1.0 mm (MWA group) and from 38.5 ± 43.0 to 1.3 ± 3.8 mm (LA group) (P < 0.05 for both). The complication rates did not differ between the MWA group (9.1%) and the LA group (2.9%) (P > 0.05). No local recurrence or distant metastasis occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

During the short-term follow-up period, ultrasound-guided MWA and LA were both safe and effective methods in treating patients with unifocal PTMC. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在比较超声引导下微波消融(MWA)和激光消融(LA)治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌(PTMC)的疗效和安全性。

研究设计/材料和方法:回顾性分析了 67 例单灶性 PTMC 患者的临床资料,其中 33 例行 MWA(MWA 组),34 例行 LA(LA 组)。随访包括甲状腺功能检查、超声、超声造影(CEUS)、胸部 X 线或 CT 扫描。比较两组患者的治疗反应和并发症。

结果

MWA 组和 LA 组的随访时间分别为 23.3±4.4 个月和 22.8±4.1 个月。两组均成功按计划完成消融治疗,且治疗后均经 CEUS 证实。末次随访时,MWA 组最大直径由治疗前的 5.0±1.4mm 缩小至 0.1±0.4mm(P<0.05),体积由 51.9±40.8mm 缩小至 0.2±1.0mm(P<0.05);LA 组最大直径由治疗前的 4.5±1.6mm 缩小至 0.6±1.2mm(P<0.05),体积由 38.5±43.0mm 缩小至 1.3±3.8mm(P<0.05)。MWA 组并发症发生率为 9.1%(3/33),LA 组为 2.9%(1/34),两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组均无局部复发或远处转移。

结论

在短期随访中,超声引导下 MWA 和 LA 治疗单灶性 PTMC 均安全有效。

相似文献

1
Ultrasound-Guided Laser Ablation Versus Microwave Ablation for Patients With Unifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Retrospective Study.超声引导激光消融与微波消融治疗单发甲状腺微小乳头状癌的回顾性研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Nov;52(9):855-862. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23238. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
The relationship between ablation range and ablation energy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a comparison between microwave ablation and laser ablation.甲状腺微小乳头状癌消融范围与消融能量的关系:微波消融与激光消融的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):6072-6081. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10636-4. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
3
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation for the treatment of unifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study.超声引导下射频消融与微波消融治疗单发甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效与安全性比较:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2024;41(1):2287964. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2023.2287964. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
Analysis and evaluation of the efficacy of ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.超声引导下微波消融治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效分析与评价。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2021;38(1):1476-1485. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1988152.
5
US-guided Microwave Ablation of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: Longer-Term Results of a Prospective Study.超声引导下微波消融治疗低危甲状腺微小乳头状癌:一项前瞻性研究的长期结果。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Jun 1;105(6). doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa128.
6
Clinical Effects of Microwave Ablation in the Treatment of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinomas and Related Histopathological Changes.微波消融治疗低危型甲状腺微小乳头状癌的临床效果及相关病理组织学改变。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 16;12:751213. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.751213. eCollection 2021.
7
Long-term efficacy of microwave ablation for multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a 5-year follow-up study.微波消融治疗多灶性甲状腺微小乳头状癌的长期疗效:5 年随访研究。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Jan;34(1):715-723. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10117-0. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
8
Efficacy and safety of laser ablation and microwave ablation to treat papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A retrospective study.激光消融与微波消融治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效与安全性:一项回顾性研究。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2024 Nov-Dec;45(6):104496. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104496. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
9
Ultrasound-guided laser ablation versus surgery for solitary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study.超声引导下激光消融与手术治疗单发甲状腺微小乳头状癌的回顾性研究。
Int J Hyperthermia. 2019;36(1):897-904. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1649475.
10
Effects of Microwave Ablation on Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Five-Year Follow-Up Report.微波消融治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的五年随访报告。
Thyroid. 2020 Dec;30(12):1752-1758. doi: 10.1089/thy.2020.0049. Epub 2020 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting the efficacy of microwave ablation of benign thyroid nodules from ultrasound images using deep convolutional neural networks.使用深度卷积神经网络从超声图像预测良性甲状腺结节微波消融的疗效。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02989-7.
2
Role of Ultrasound Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in Diagnosis and Management of Malignant Thyroid Nodules-An Update.超声弹性成像和超声造影(CEUS)在甲状腺恶性结节诊断与管理中的作用——最新进展
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 1;15(5):599. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050599.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Different Thermal Ablation Modalities for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.
不同热消融方式治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效与安全性:一项网状Meta分析
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 31;2022:9448349. doi: 10.1155/2022/9448349. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison between thermal ablation and surgery in low risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a prospective study.热消融与手术治疗低危甲状腺微小乳头状癌的前瞻性对比研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 1;15:1398208. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1398208. eCollection 2024.
5
The relationship between ablation range and ablation energy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a comparison between microwave ablation and laser ablation.甲状腺微小乳头状癌消融范围与消融能量的关系:微波消融与激光消融的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):6072-6081. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10636-4. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
6
Efficacy and safety of thermal ablation modalities for the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Systematic Review and network meta-analysis.热消融方式治疗甲状腺微小乳头状癌的疗效与安全性:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 30;10(3):e25536. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25536. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
7
Laser Ablation for Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules - A Mini-Literature Review.激光消融治疗甲状腺良恶性结节——文献综述。
Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(4):394-401. doi: 10.2174/0118715303275468231004105258.
8
Meta-Analysis of the Application Effect of Different Modalities of Thermal Ablation and Surgical Treatment in Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma.Meta 分析不同热消融和手术治疗模式在甲状腺微小乳头状癌中的应用效果。
Dis Markers. 2022 Sep 30;2022:9714140. doi: 10.1155/2022/9714140. eCollection 2022.
9
Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided thermal ablation in treating T1aN0M0 and T1bN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: A meta-analysis.超声引导热消融治疗 T1aN0M0 和 T1bN0M0 甲状腺乳头状癌的安全性和有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 27;13:952113. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.952113. eCollection 2022.
10
Research Review of Thermal Ablation in the Treatment of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma.甲状腺乳头状癌热消融治疗的研究综述
Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 1;12:859396. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.859396. eCollection 2022.