• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出版物的中介作用。

Intermediacy of publications.

作者信息

Šubelj Lovro, Waltman Ludo, Traag Vincent, van Eck Nees Jan

机构信息

University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Leiden University, Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jan 15;7(1):190207. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190207. eCollection 2020 Jan.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.190207
PMID:32218924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7029947/
Abstract

Citation networks of scientific publications offer fundamental insights into the structure and development of scientific knowledge. We propose a new measure, called intermediacy, for tracing the historical development of scientific knowledge. Given two publications, an older and a more recent one, intermediacy identifies publications that seem to play a major role in the historical development from the older to the more recent publication. The identified publications are important in connecting the older and the more recent publication in the citation network. After providing a formal definition of intermediacy, we study its mathematical properties. We then present two empirical case studies, one tracing historical developments at the interface between the community detection literature and the scientometric literature and one examining the development of the literature on peer review. We show both conceptually and empirically how intermediacy differs from main path analysis, which is the most popular approach for tracing historical developments in citation networks. Main path analysis tends to favour longer paths over shorter ones, whereas intermediacy has the opposite tendency. Compared to the main path analysis, we conclude that intermediacy offers a more principled approach for tracing the historical development of scientific knowledge.

摘要

科学出版物的引用网络为洞察科学知识的结构和发展提供了基本视角。我们提出了一种名为中介性的新度量方法,用于追溯科学知识的历史发展。给定两篇出版物,一篇较旧的和一篇较新的,中介性可识别出在从旧出版物到新出版物的历史发展过程中似乎起主要作用的出版物。所识别出的出版物在引用网络中连接旧出版物和新出版物方面很重要。在给出中介性的正式定义后,我们研究其数学性质。然后我们展示两个实证案例研究,一个追溯社区检测文献和科学计量学文献之间界面的历史发展,另一个考察同行评审文献的发展。我们从概念和实证两方面展示了中介性与主路径分析的不同,主路径分析是引用网络中追溯历史发展最流行的方法。主路径分析倾向于青睐较长路径而非较短路径,而中介性则有相反的倾向。与主路径分析相比,我们得出结论,中介性为追溯科学知识的历史发展提供了一种更有原则的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/ef46e1ebb5ce/rsos190207-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/814f6e515f5d/rsos190207-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/9bb3a8be29b2/rsos190207-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/0189aeac895d/rsos190207-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/45bbeffb8a45/rsos190207-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/be00e44561c1/rsos190207-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/422ed424d21a/rsos190207-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/ef46e1ebb5ce/rsos190207-g7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/814f6e515f5d/rsos190207-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/9bb3a8be29b2/rsos190207-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/0189aeac895d/rsos190207-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/45bbeffb8a45/rsos190207-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/be00e44561c1/rsos190207-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/422ed424d21a/rsos190207-g6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f26/7029947/ef46e1ebb5ce/rsos190207-g7.jpg

相似文献

1
Intermediacy of publications.出版物的中介作用。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Jan 15;7(1):190207. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190207. eCollection 2020 Jan.
2
Scientific X-ray: Scanning and quantifying the idea evolution of scientific publications.科学 X 射线:扫描和量化科学出版物的思想演变。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0275192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275192. eCollection 2022.
3
The citation wake of publications detects nobel laureates' papers.出版物的引用轨迹能检测出诺贝尔奖得主的论文。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 1;9(12):e113184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113184. eCollection 2014.
4
Citation success of different publication types: a case study on all references in psychology publications from the German-speaking countries (D-A-CH-L-L) in 2009, 2010, and 2011.不同出版物类型的被引成功率:以2009年、2010年和2011年德语国家(德国、奥地利、瑞士、列支敦士登)心理学出版物中的所有参考文献为例的研究。
Scientometrics. 2015;104(3):827-840. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1573-y. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
5
Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers.科学论文的引文索引与评价
Science. 1967 Mar 10;155(3767):1213-9. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3767.1213.
6
Mapping the historical development of physical activity and health research: A structured literature review and citation network analysis.绘制体力活动与健康研究的历史发展图谱:一项结构化文献回顾和引文网络分析。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:466-472. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.10.020.
7
The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review.一个领域的兴起:同行评审研究的网络分析
Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):503-532. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
8
Citation bias in the literature on dietary trans fatty acids and serum cholesterol.饮食反式脂肪酸与血清胆固醇文献中的引用偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;106:88-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
9
Network Analysis of Publications on Topological Indices from the Web of Science.来自科学网的拓扑指数出版物的网络分析。
Mol Inform. 2014 Aug;33(8):514-35. doi: 10.1002/minf.201400014. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
10
A Scientometric Review of Rasch Measurement: The Rise and Progress of a Specialty.拉施测量的科学计量学综述:一个专业领域的兴起与发展
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 22;10:2197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02197. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
The emergence of a field: a network analysis of research on peer review.一个领域的兴起:同行评审研究的网络分析
Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):503-532. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
2
Tracing Technological Development Trajectories: A Genetic Knowledge Persistence-Based Main Path Approach.追踪技术发展轨迹:一种基于遗传知识持久性的主路径方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0170895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170895. eCollection 2017.
3
Community detection in networks: Structural communities versus ground truth.
网络中的社区检测:结构社区与真实情况。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Dec;90(6):062805. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.062805. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
4
Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure.复杂网络上随机游走的图谱揭示了群落结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1118-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706851105. Epub 2008 Jan 23.
5
Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices.利用矩阵特征向量在网络中寻找社区结构。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2006 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):036104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036104. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
6
Modularity and community structure in networks.网络中的模块化与群落结构。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 6;103(23):8577-82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601602103. Epub 2006 May 24.
7
Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks.网络中社区结构检测的快速算法。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Jun;69(6 Pt 2):066133. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066133. Epub 2004 Jun 18.
8
Finding and evaluating community structure in networks.在网络中寻找并评估社区结构。
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Feb;69(2 Pt 2):026113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
9
Scientific output and recognition: a study in the operation of the reward system in science.科学产出与认可:一项关于科学奖励系统运作的研究。
Am Sociol Rev. 1967 Jun;32(3):377-90.
10
The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered.科学中的马太效应。对科学的奖励和交流系统进行了探讨。
Science. 1968 Jan 5;159(3810):56-63.