Suppr超能文献

[早期脾动脉阻断在腹腔镜下保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术(木村术式)中的应用]

[Application of Early Splenic Artery Occlusion in Laparoscopic Spleen-preserving Distal Pancreatectomy using Kimura Technique].

作者信息

Ouyang Guo-Qing, Li Yong-Bin, Cai Yun-Qiang, Cai He, Peng Bing

机构信息

West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Mar;51(2):236-244. doi: 10.12182/20200260201.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To present our institutional experience in laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (Lap-SPDP) using Kimura technique with or without early occlusion of the root of the splenic artery. In addition, to explore the safety and feasibility of this occlusion technique, especially its advantages in intraoperative hemorrhage control and spleen preservation.

METHODS

From February 2011 to May 2019, 54 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as benign or low-grade malignant space-occupying lesions at the body and the tail of pancreas underwent Lap-SPDP using Kimura technique in our institution. Twenty-five patients before 2015 were allocated into non-occlusion group and 29 patients after 2015 were allocated into occlusion group. The non-occlusion group underwent direct dissection of the distal pancreas with blood supply from the splenic artery as well as traditional traction of the splenic artery without occlusion. Whereas the occlusion group underwent temporary occlusion of the root of the splenic artery by Bulldog clip after transecting the neck of the pancreas and distal pancreas was excised under a relatively bloodless situation. Surgical techniques were described in detail. Data between groups were retrospectively collected and stratification analysis was performed based on the diameter of tumor (>3 cm or ≤3 cm).

RESULTS

Before stratification, there was a statistical difference in age between the two groups ( =0.033), but no difference in body mass index (BMI) ( =0.069). The median lesion diameter of the two groups was 2.5 cm and 4 cm, respectively, with no statistical difference ( =0.065). The success rates of spleen preservation in the two groups were 93.1% and 92% respectively, showing no significant difference ( =1.000). The length of hospital stay was slightly longer in the non-occlusion group than that in the occlusion group ( =0.020). Comparing with the non-occlusion group, the occlusion group had significantly shorter operation time (median, 165 min vs. 235 min) and less estimated blood loss (median, 100 mL vs. 200 mL) ( <0.05). After stratification by the tumor diameter, there were 2 cases of failed spleen preservation both in occlusion and non-occlusion group with tumor diameter >3 cm (occlusion group: 2/8, 25% and non-occlusion group: 2/14,14.3%). However there was no statistical difference between the two groups ( =0.602). When the tumor diameter ≤3 cm, the spleen preservation rate of both groups reached 100%. When the tumor diameter was >3 cm, the operation time of the occlusion group was shorter than that of the non-occlusion group ( =0.005). In terms of intraoperative blood loss, regardless of tumor size, the occlusion group had less estimated blood loss than that of the non-occlusion group ( <0.05). In the occlusion group, no conversion or blood transfusion was needed intraoperatively and/or postoperatively. After stratification, there was no difference in the length of hospital stay between two groups ( >0.05). During the follow-up period (median (Min-Max), 13.5 (3-96) months), no perioperative death, disease recurrence, portal vein or splenic vein thrombosis, gastric varices or upper gastrointestinal bleeding was noted.

CONCLUSION

Lap-SPDP using Kimura technique with early occlusion of the root of splenic artery was safe and feasible and could be generally applied. By using this technique, we could reduce the operation time and blood loss, as well as sustain a high probability of spleen preservation.

摘要

目的

介绍我们机构使用木村技术进行腹腔镜保留脾脏的胰体尾切除术(Lap-SPDP)的经验,该技术可选择早期阻断脾动脉根部或不阻断。此外,探讨这种阻断技术的安全性和可行性,特别是其在术中控制出血和保留脾脏方面的优势。

方法

2011年2月至2019年5月,我们机构连续54例被诊断为胰体尾部良性或低度恶性占位性病变的患者接受了使用木村技术的Lap-SPDP。2015年前的25例患者被分配到非阻断组,2015年后的29例患者被分配到阻断组。非阻断组直接解剖脾动脉供血的胰体尾部,并对脾动脉进行传统的牵拉而不阻断。而阻断组在横断胰颈后用Bulldog夹临时阻断脾动脉根部,在相对无血的情况下切除胰体尾部。详细描述了手术技术。回顾性收集两组间的数据,并根据肿瘤直径(>3 cm或≤3 cm)进行分层分析。

结果

分层前,两组患者年龄有统计学差异(P=0.033),但体重指数(BMI)无差异(P=0.069)。两组病变的中位直径分别为2.5 cm和4 cm,无统计学差异(P=0.065)。两组的脾脏保留成功率分别为93.1%和92%,无显著差异(P=1.000)。非阻断组的住院时间略长于阻断组(P=0.020)。与非阻断组相比,阻断组的手术时间明显缩短(中位时间,165分钟对235分钟),估计失血量更少(中位时间,100 mL对200 mL)(P<0.05)。按肿瘤直径分层后,肿瘤直径>3 cm的阻断组和非阻断组均有2例脾脏保留失败(阻断组:2/8,25%;非阻断组:2/14,14.3%)。然而,两组之间无统计学差异(P=0.602)。当肿瘤直径≤3 cm时,两组的脾脏保留率均达到100%。当肿瘤直径>3 cm时,阻断组的手术时间短于非阻断组(P=0.005)。在术中出血量方面,无论肿瘤大小,阻断组的估计失血量均少于非阻断组(P<0.05)。在阻断组中,术中及术后均无需中转或输血。分层后,两组的住院时间无差异(P>0.05)。在随访期间(中位时间(最小值-最大值),13.5(3-96)个月),未观察到围手术期死亡、疾病复发、门静脉或脾静脉血栓形成、胃静脉曲张或上消化道出血。

结论

采用木村技术并早期阻断脾动脉根部的Lap-SPDP是安全可行的,可广泛应用。通过使用该技术,我们可以缩短手术时间和减少失血量,并维持较高的脾脏保留概率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验