Suppr超能文献

医学领域共情训练的系统评价

Empathy training in health sciences: A systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, University of Cádiz, Venus Street, 11207, Algeciras, Cádiz, Spain.

QuironSalud Campo de Gibraltar Hospital, Businessman Avenue, 11379, Palmones, Los Barrios, Cádiz, Spain.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Pract. 2020 Mar;44:102739. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102739. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

Abstract

Effective empathy training interventions based on scientific evidence becomes essential. A theoretical framework should guide the proposed interventions and be coherent with the evaluation of the dimensions taking in account that empathy is currently a multidimensional concept. The study aimed to determine, in health care professionals and/or students, what is the effectiveness of experiential versus humanistic training, in terms of improvement of empathic ability (dimensions) and maintenance over time of what has been learned, and to establish the degree of coherence between the proposed theoretical model and the trained and evaluated dimensions. A systematic review using six databases was performed. The data were synthesised, and the risk of bias was analysed using the Equator Guidelines. Twenty-three articles were selected. Further evidence of the effectiveness of experiential intervention against humanistic educational strategies was observed. Most studies were not based on a solid theoretical framework and, in these cases, inconsistency between empathic trained dimensions and those evaluated was detected. Although a better understanding of training time variable is required, middle-term interventions are recommended. Increasing the multicentre controlled trials; specifying the intervention that includes the empathy dimensions; triangulating the data from health professionals, patients, and external observers; and including monitoring, becomes a necessity.

摘要

基于科学证据的有效同理心培训干预变得至关重要。理论框架应指导拟议的干预措施,并与所考虑的维度的评估保持一致,因为同理心目前是一个多维度的概念。本研究旨在确定在医疗保健专业人员和/或学生中,体验式与人文主义培训在提高同理心能力(维度)方面的有效性,以及在学习过程中保持所学内容的效果,并确定所提出的理论模型与所训练和评估的维度之间的一致性程度。使用六个数据库进行了系统评价。综合了数据,并使用 EQUATOR 指南分析了偏倚风险。选择了 23 篇文章。观察到体验式干预对人文教育策略的有效性有进一步的证据。大多数研究没有基于坚实的理论框架,在这些情况下,发现同理心训练维度与评估维度之间存在不一致。尽管需要进一步了解培训时间变量,但建议进行中期干预。增加多中心对照试验;具体说明包括同理心维度的干预措施;从卫生专业人员、患者和外部观察员那里对数据进行三角测量;并包括监测,这是必要的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验