The Ethox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford University, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jun;46(6):416-417. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106197. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
On 26 February 2020, the German Constitutional Court rejected a law from 2015 that prohibited any form of 'business-like' assisted suicide as unconstitutional. The landmark ruling of the highest federal court emphasised the high priority given to the rights of autonomy and free personal development, both of which constitute the principle of human dignity, the first principle of the German constitution. The ruling echoes particularities of post-war Germany's end-of-life debate focusing on patient self-determination while rejecting any discussion of active assistance to die through a lethal injection administered by a doctor. This brief report discusses the ruling in the light of the broader sociopolitical and historical context of the German end-of-life debate.
2020 年 2 月 26 日,德国联邦宪法法院驳回了 2015 年的一项法律,该法律禁止任何形式的“商业化”协助自杀,认为其违反宪法。这一联邦最高法院的具有里程碑意义的裁决强调了对自主权和个人自由发展权利的高度重视,这两者构成了人的尊严原则,是德国宪法的首要原则。该裁决反映了战后德国生命末期辩论的特殊性,侧重于患者的自我决定,同时拒绝任何通过医生注射致命药物来积极协助死亡的讨论。本简要报告根据德国生命末期辩论的更广泛的社会政治和历史背景来讨论该裁决。