• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用谷歌大数据分析探讨 3 个中欧国家公众对姑息治疗、安乐死和临终决策的认知趋势和模式:回顾性分析

Trends and Patterns in the Public Awareness of Palliative Care, Euthanasia, and End-of-Life Decisions in 3 Central European Countries Using Big Data Analysis From Google: Retrospective Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Oncology with affiliated Unit of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 20;23(9):e28635. doi: 10.2196/28635.

DOI:10.2196/28635
PMID:34542419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8491122/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

End-of-life decisions, specifically the provision of euthanasia and assisted suicide services, challenge traditional medical and ethical principles. Austria and Germany have decided to liberalize their laws restricting assisted suicide, thus reigniting the debate about a meaningful framework in which the practice should be embedded. Evidence of the relevance of assisted suicide and euthanasia for the general population in Germany and Austria is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to examine whether the public awareness documented by search activities in the most frequently used search engine, Google, on the topics of palliative care, euthanasia, and advance health care directives changed with the implementation of palliative care services and new governmental regulations concerning end-of-life decisions.

METHODS

We searched for policies, laws, and regulations promulgated or amended in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland between 2004 and 2020 and extracted data on the search volume for each search term topic from Google Trends as a surrogate of public awareness and interest. Annual averages were analyzed using the Joinpoint Regression Program.

RESULTS

Important policy changes yielded significant changes in search trends for the investigated topics. The enactment of laws regulating advance health care directives coincided with a significant drop in the volume of searches for the topic of euthanasia in all 3 countries (Austria: -24.48%, P=.02; Germany: -14.95%, P<.001; Switzerland: -11.75%, P=.049). Interest in palliative care increased with the availability of care services and the implementation of laws and policies to promote palliative care (Austria: 22.69%, P=.01; Germany: 14.39, P<.001; Switzerland: 17.59%, P<.001). The search trends for advance health care directives showed mixed results. While interest remained steady in Austria within the study period, it increased by 3.66% (P<.001) in Switzerland and decreased by 2.85% (P<.001) in Germany.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that legal measures securing patients' autonomy at the end of life may lower the search activities for topics related to euthanasia and assisted suicide. Palliative care may be a meaningful way to raise awareness of the different options for end-of-life care and to guide patients in their decision-making process regarding the same.

摘要

背景

临终决策,特别是安乐死和协助自杀服务的提供,挑战了传统的医学和伦理原则。奥地利和德国已决定放宽限制协助自杀的法律,从而再次引发了关于应在何种有意义的框架内纳入该做法的辩论。有关安乐死和协助自杀在德国和奥地利普通民众中的相关性的证据有限。

目的

本研究旨在探讨通过最常用搜索引擎 Google 上的搜索活动记录的公众意识是否随着姑息治疗服务的实施以及有关临终决策的新政府法规的出台而改变,这些搜索活动记录了姑息治疗、安乐死和预先医疗指示这三个主题。

方法

我们搜索了奥地利、德国和瑞士在 2004 年至 2020 年间颁布或修订的政策、法律和法规,并从 Google Trends 中提取每个搜索主题的搜索量数据,作为公众意识和兴趣的替代指标。使用 Joinpoint 回归程序分析年度平均值。

结果

重要的政策变化导致调查主题的搜索趋势发生了显著变化。监管预先医疗指示的法律的颁布与这 3 个国家的安乐死主题搜索量的显著下降相一致(奥地利:-24.48%,P=.02;德国:-14.95%,P<.001;瑞士:-11.75%,P=.049)。随着姑息治疗服务的提供以及促进姑息治疗的法律和政策的实施,公众对姑息治疗的兴趣增加(奥地利:22.69%,P=.01;德国:14.39,P<.001;瑞士:17.59%,P<.001)。预先医疗指示的搜索趋势结果喜忧参半。虽然在研究期间,奥地利的兴趣保持稳定,但在瑞士增加了 3.66%(P<.001),而在德国则减少了 2.85%(P<.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,保障患者在生命末期自主权的法律措施可能会降低与安乐死和协助自杀相关主题的搜索活动。姑息治疗可能是提高对不同临终护理选择的认识并指导患者做出相同决策的一种有意义的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c4/8491122/3b644adc9a64/jmir_v23i9e28635_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c4/8491122/3b644adc9a64/jmir_v23i9e28635_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42c4/8491122/3b644adc9a64/jmir_v23i9e28635_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends and Patterns in the Public Awareness of Palliative Care, Euthanasia, and End-of-Life Decisions in 3 Central European Countries Using Big Data Analysis From Google: Retrospective Analysis.利用谷歌大数据分析探讨 3 个中欧国家公众对姑息治疗、安乐死和临终决策的认知趋势和模式:回顾性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 20;23(9):e28635. doi: 10.2196/28635.
2
Patients' knowledge of options at the end of life: ignorance in the face of death.患者对临终选择的认知:面对死亡时的无知。
JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2483-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2483.
3
Low validity of Google Trends for behavioral forecasting of national suicide rates.谷歌趋势对全国自杀率行为预测的有效性较低。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0183149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183149. eCollection 2017.
4
Palliative care versus euthanasia. The German position: the German General Medical Council's principles for medical care of the terminally ill.姑息治疗与安乐死。德国的立场:德国医学总会关于晚期患者医疗护理的原则
J Med Philos. 2000 Apr;25(2):195-219. doi: 10.1076/0360-5310(200004)25:2;1-O;FT195.
5
[Forgoing treatments: a kind of euthanasia? A scientific approach to the debate about end of life decisions].[放弃治疗:一种安乐死?关于临终决策辩论的科学探讨]
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Mar;107(3):127-39. doi: 10.1701/2182.23602.
6
Doctor-cared dying instead of physician-assisted suicide: a perspective from Germany.医生关怀下的临终而非医生协助自杀:来自德国的观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2010 Nov;13(4):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s11019-010-9266-z.
7
A qualitative study on continuous deep sedation until death as an alternative to assisted suicide in Switzerland.瑞士一项关于持续深度镇静直至死亡以替代协助自杀的定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 May 14;20(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00761-y.
8
Seven legal barriers to end-of-life care: myths, realities, and grains of truth.临终关怀的七个法律障碍:误区、现实与真相
JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2495-501. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.19.2495.
9
Physician assisted suicide in dementia: A critical review of global evidence and considerations from India.医师协助下的痴呆症患者自杀:全球证据的批判性回顾及来自印度的考虑。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Oct;64:102802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102802. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
Decreasing public interest in social psychiatry: An infodemiological study of worldwide Google search volumes from 2004 to 2021.公众对社会精神病学兴趣降低:2004 年至 2021 年全球谷歌搜索量的信息流行病学研究。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;69(1):216-220. doi: 10.1177/00207640221090960. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
End-of-life in cancer patients: Medicolegal implications and ethical challenges in Europe.癌症患者的临终关怀:欧洲的法医学影响及伦理挑战
Open Med (Wars). 2025 Jun 10;20(1):20251218. doi: 10.1515/med-2025-1218. eCollection 2025.
2
Trends in public interest and vaccination coverage for Herpes Zoster.带状疱疹的公众关注度及疫苗接种覆盖率趋势
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Feb 13;9:100592. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100592. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Living with technological challenges: does socioeconomic status affect people's health?

本文引用的文献

1
Advance directives in Austrian intensive care units: An analysis of prevalence and barriers.奥地利重症监护病房的预立医疗指示:患病率及障碍分析
Resusc Plus. 2020 Jun 28;3:100014. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2020.100014. eCollection 2020 Sep.
2
'Desire to Die' in palliative care patients-legal framework and recommendations of the national evidence-based guideline on palliative care in Germany.姑息治疗患者的“求死愿望”——德国姑息治疗国家循证指南的法律框架及建议
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;10(3):3594-3610. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-381. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
The ongoing discussion on termination of life on request. A review from a German/European perspective.
面对技术挑战:社会经济地位会影响人们的健康吗?
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05662-2.
4
Public interest in palliative care in Latin America: A Google Trends analysis.拉美地区民众对姑息治疗的关注度:谷歌趋势分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0306312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306312. eCollection 2024.
5
The General Public and Young Adults' Knowledge and Perception of Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.公众和年轻人对姑息治疗的认知与看法:一项系统综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 7;12(10):957. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12100957.
6
Attitudes and Behaviors of Palliative Care Nurses on Euthanasia.姑息治疗护士对安乐死的态度和行为
Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2023 Apr;31(Supp1):S66-S70. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2023.23056.
7
Impact of the cervical cancer awareness months on public interest in Japan: A Google Trends analysis, 2012-2021.日本宫颈癌宣传月对公众关注度的影响:2012-2021 年谷歌趋势分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 13;12(1):15391. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19798-x.
关于请求终止生命的持续讨论。从德国/欧洲的角度进行的回顾。
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2021 Mar;25(1):2-18. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2020.1797097. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
4
Exploring Public Awareness of Overwork Prevention With Big Data From Google Trends: Retrospective Analysis.利用谷歌趋势大数据探索公众对预防过度劳累的认知:回顾性分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 26;22(6):e18181. doi: 10.2196/18181.
5
The right to a self-determined death as expression of the right to freedom of personal development: The German Constitutional Court takes a clear stand on assisted suicide.自主死亡权作为个人发展自由权的表现:德国联邦宪法法院在协助自杀问题上明确表态。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jun;46(6):416-417. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106197. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
Germany overturns ban on assisted suicide.德国推翻了对协助自杀的禁令。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):774. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30533-X.
7
End-of-life decision making by Austrian physicians - a cross-sectional study.奥地利医生的临终决策 - 一项横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jan 4;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0509-3.
8
The state of health in the European Union (EU-28) in 2017: an analysis of the burden of diseases and injuries.2017 年欧盟(欧盟 28 国)的健康状况:疾病和伤害负担分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Jun 1;30(3):573-578. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz203.
9
The good death and the institutionalisation of dying: An interpretive analysis of the Austrian discourse.善终与死亡的制度化:奥地利话语的阐释分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;245:112671. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112671. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
10
Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review.评估谷歌趋势研究中的方法、工具和统计方法:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Nov 6;20(11):e270. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9366.