Que Jenny, Wu Hung-Chang, Lin Chia-Hui, Huang Chung-I, Li Li-Ching, Ho Chung-Han
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chi-Mei Medical Center.
Department of Hospital and Health Care Administration, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan, Taiwan.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(13):e19660. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019660.
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, the treatment outcomes for patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) remain poor. In this study, we evaluate the efficacy of SBRT with and or without sorafenib for advanced HCC with PVTT.Fifty four HCC patients with PVTT treated with SBRT using the Cyberknife system was retrospectively analyzed between January 2009 and June 2016. Of these, sorafenib combined with SBRT was administered to 18 patients and SBRT alone was administered to 36 patients. SBRT was designed to target the liver tumor and tumor thrombosis, with a radiation dose of 36 to 45 Gy (median 40 Gy) given in 3 to 5 fractions.The mean follow-up period for SBRT with sorafenib and SBRT alone was 13.22 ± 10.07 months and 15.33 ± 22.01 months, respectively. The response rate was comparable in both groups. Complete response and partial response rates were 77.77% for SBRT with sorafenib and 75.00% without sorafenib (P = .43). The median progression-free survival rate was 6 months (2-11 months) versus 3 months (2-5.6 months) (P = .24) and the 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates were 25.7% and 15.2% versus 11.1% and 8.3% (P = .1225). The median, 1- and 2-year overall survival rates (OSR) were 12.5 months, 55.6% and 17.7% versus 7 months (5-13.5 months), 33.3% and 11.1% (P = .28), for SBRT with sorafenib versus SBRT alone groups, respectively.The result of our study shows that SBRT with sorafenib administered group resulted in a higher median, progression-free, and OSR for HCC patients with PVTT. However, the trends did not attain statistical significance. A large-scale randomized study is needed to assess the benefits of SBRT with sorafenib administration for patient with PVTT.
立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)已成为无法切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一种治疗选择。然而,门静脉肿瘤血栓形成(PVTT)患者的治疗效果仍然较差。在本研究中,我们评估了SBRT联合或不联合索拉非尼治疗晚期PVTT-HCC的疗效。
回顾性分析了2009年1月至2016年6月期间使用射波刀系统接受SBRT治疗的54例PVTT-HCC患者。其中,18例患者接受索拉非尼联合SBRT治疗,36例患者仅接受SBRT治疗。SBRT旨在靶向肝脏肿瘤和肿瘤血栓,放射剂量为36至45 Gy(中位剂量40 Gy),分3至5次给予。
索拉非尼联合SBRT组和单纯SBRT组的平均随访期分别为13.22±10.07个月和15.33±22.01个月。两组的缓解率相当。索拉非尼联合SBRT组的完全缓解率和部分缓解率为77.77%,不联合索拉非尼组为75.00%(P = 0.43)。中位无进展生存率分别为6个月(2至11个月)和3个月(2至5.6个月)(P = 0.24),1年和2年无进展生存率分别为25.7%和15.2%以及11.1%和8.3%(P = 0.1225)。索拉非尼联合SBRT组和单纯SBRT组的中位、1年和2年总生存率(OSR)分别为12.5个月、55.6%和17.7%以及7个月(5至13.5个月)、33.3%和11.1%(P = 0.28)。
我们的研究结果表明,索拉非尼联合SBRT治疗组的PVTT-HCC患者的中位、无进展和总生存率较高。然而,这些趋势未达到统计学意义。需要进行大规模随机研究来评估索拉非尼联合SBRT给药对PVTT患者的益处。