O'Keefe T R, Graves H B, Siegel H S
Department of Poultry Science, Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802.
Poult Sci. 1988 Jul;67(7):1008-14. doi: 10.3382/ps.0671008.
The dominance hierarchy that exists among free ranging chickens is a peck order. Several researchers have attempted to correlate various production parameters of caged layers with dominance rank, with mixed results. Animal welfare groups have expressed increasing concern over the effects of battery cage housing on the behavior of layers, even though several researchers have shown that the incidence of aggressive pecks decreases in these cages. The studies presented here demonstrate that agonistic interactions occur among most pairs of hens housed in pens but do not occur among most pairs of hens housed in cages. Therefore, peck orders could be constructed for hens housed in pens but not for hens housed in cages. Incidence of agonistic interactions is highest in cage-housed hens immediately following housing of the hens; this peak is matched when group membership is mixed. These results suggest that a social system does form among caged hens even if a peck order does not. A single dominant hen in each cage was involved in and won a large majority of the agonistic encounters in the cages. The lack of evidence of dominance relationships between pairs of hens in cages, other than those between a single dominant hen and its cage mates, supports the hypothesis that despotism, not a peck order, was the prevailing social organization among hens housed in high-density cages.
自由放养的鸡群中存在的等级制度是一种啄序。几位研究人员试图将笼养蛋鸡的各种生产参数与等级地位联系起来,结果不一。动物福利组织对层架式鸡笼饲养对蛋鸡行为的影响越来越关注,尽管几位研究人员表明,在这些笼子里攻击性啄击的发生率会降低。这里呈现的研究表明,在围栏中饲养的大多数母鸡对之间会发生争斗性互动,但在笼子中饲养的大多数母鸡对之间不会发生。因此,可以为围栏中饲养的母鸡构建啄序,但不能为笼子中饲养的母鸡构建。争斗性互动的发生率在母鸡入笼后立即饲养的笼养母鸡中最高;当鸡群成员混合时,这个峰值会与之匹配。这些结果表明,即使没有啄序,笼养母鸡之间也确实形成了一种社会体系。每个笼子里的一只占主导地位的母鸡参与并赢得了笼子里绝大多数的争斗性遭遇。除了一只占主导地位的母鸡与其笼中同伴之间的关系外,笼子里母鸡对之间缺乏等级关系的证据,支持了这样一种假设,即在高密度笼子中饲养的母鸡中,专制而非啄序是主要的社会组织形式。