Suppr超能文献

笼内空间和笼具大小对饲养在有设备笼具中蛋鸡的影响,第二部分:采食行为。

The effect of space allowance and cage size on laying hens housed in furnished cages, Part II: Behavior at the feeder.

机构信息

Department of Animal Biosciences and the Campbell Center for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Rd. E., Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2017 Sep 1;96(11):3816-3823. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex198.

Abstract

Standards for feeder (a.k.a. feed trough) space allowance (SA) are based primarily on studies in conventional cages where laying hens tend to eat simultaneously, limiting feeder space. Large furnished cages (FC) offer more total space and opportunities to perform a greater variety of behaviors, which may affect feeding behavior and feeder space requirements. Our objective was to determine the effects of floor/feeder SA on behavior at the feeder. LSL-Lite hens were housed in FC equipped with a nest, perches, and a scratch mat. Hens with SA of either 520 cm2 (Low; 8.9 cm feeder space/hen) or 748 cm2 (High; 12.8 cm feeder space/hen) per bird resulted in groups of 40 vs. 28 birds in small FC (SFC) and 80 vs. 55 in large FC (LFC). Chain feeders ran at 0500, 0800, 1100, 1400, and 1700 with lights on at 0500 and off at 1900 hours. Digital recordings of FC were scanned at chain feeder onset and every 15 min for one h after (5 scans × 5 feeding times × 2 d) to count the number of birds with their head in the feeder. All occurrences of aggressive pecks and displacements during 2 continuous 30-minute observations at 0800 h and 1700 h also were counted. Mixed model repeated analyses tested the effects of SA, cage size, and time on the percent of hens feeding, and the frequency of aggressive pecks and displacements. Surprisingly, the percent of birds feeding simultaneously was similar regardless of cage size (LFC: 23.0 ± 0.9%; SFC: 24.0 ± 1.0%; P = 0.44) or SA (Low: 23.8 ± 0.9%; High: 23.3 ± 1.0%; P = 0.62). More birds were observed feeding at 1700 h (35.3 ± 0.1%) than any at other time (P < 0.001). Feeder use differed by cage area (nest, middle, or scratch) over the d (P < 0.001). The frequency of aggressive pecks was low overall and not affected by SA or cage size. Frequency of displacements was also low but greater at Low SA (P = 0.001). There was little evidence of feeder competition at the Low SA in this study.

摘要

饲养器(又名饲料槽)空间允许标准主要基于在传统笼中进行的研究,在传统笼中,产蛋鸡往往会同时进食,从而限制了饲养器的空间。大型饲养笼(FC)提供了更多的总空间和更多执行各种行为的机会,这可能会影响进食行为和饲养器空间需求。我们的目的是确定地板/饲养器空间允许标准对饲养器处行为的影响。LSL-Lite 母鸡被安置在配备有巢、栖木和抓挠垫的 FC 中。每只鸡的饲养器空间允许标准为 520 cm2(低;每只鸡 8.9 cm 饲养器空间)或 748 cm2(高;每只鸡 12.8 cm 饲养器空间),每组 40 只母鸡饲养在小型 FC(SFC)中,每组 28 只饲养在大型 FC(LFC)中。链式喂食器在 0500、0800、1100、1400 和 1700 运行,0500 开灯,1900 关灯。在链式喂食器开始后,每隔 15 分钟对 FC 进行一次数字记录扫描,持续 1 小时(5 次扫描×5 次喂食时间×2 天),以计算有多少只母鸡将头伸进饲养器中。在 0800 小时和 1700 小时连续进行的 2 次 30 分钟观察中,还计算了所有发生的攻击性啄食和移位事件的次数。混合模型重复分析测试了饲养器空间允许标准、笼舍大小和时间对母鸡进食比例以及攻击性啄食和移位频率的影响。令人惊讶的是,无论笼舍大小(LFC:23.0 ± 0.9%;SFC:24.0 ± 1.0%;P = 0.44)或饲养器空间允许标准(低:23.8 ± 0.9%;高:23.3 ± 1.0%;P = 0.62)如何,同时进食的母鸡比例相似。1700 时观察到的进食母鸡数量更多(35.3 ± 0.1%),比其他任何时间都多(P < 0.001)。饲养器的使用因笼舍区域(巢、中间或抓挠垫)而在每天(P < 0.001)有所不同。总体而言,攻击性啄食的频率较低,不受饲养器空间允许标准或笼舍大小的影响。移位的频率也较低,但在低饲养器空间允许标准时更高(P = 0.001)。在这项研究中,低饲养器空间允许标准下几乎没有证据表明存在饲养器竞争。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1aaf/5850650/fed90bb8dd7d/pex198fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验