• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房治疗的小儿创伤性脑损伤患者的创伤后癫痫。

Posttraumatic epilepsy in intensive care unit-treated pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Helsinki University Hospital & University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Emergency Care and Services, Helsinki University Hospital & University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2020 Apr;61(4):693-701. doi: 10.1111/epi.16483. Epub 2020 Mar 28.

DOI:10.1111/epi.16483
PMID:32221978
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a well-described complication of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The majority of the available data regarding PTE stem from the adult population. Our aim was to identify the clinical and radiological risk factors associated with PTE in a pediatric TBI population treated in an intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We used the Finnish Intensive Care Consortium database to identify pediatric (<18 years) TBI patients treated in four academic university hospital ICUs in Finland between 2003 and 2013. Our primary outcome was the development of PTE, defined as the need for oral antiepileptic medication in patients alive at 6 months. We assessed the risk factors associated with PTE using multivariable logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

Of the 290 patients included in the study, 59 (20%) developed PTE. Median age was 15 years (interquartile range [IQR] 13-17), and 80% had an admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤12. Major risk factors for developing PTE were age (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.16), obliterated suprasellar cisterns (OR 6.53, 95% CI 1.95-21.81), and an admission GCS score of 9-12 in comparison to a GCS score of 13-15 (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.24-6.69).

SIGNIFICANCE

We showed that PTE is a common long-term complication after ICU-treated pediatric TBI. Higher age, moderate injury severity, obliterated suprasellar cisterns, seizures during ICU stay, and surgical treatment are associated with an increased risk of PTE. Further studies are needed to identify strategies to decrease the risk of PTE.

摘要

目的

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后癫痫(PTE)是一种众所周知的并发症。关于 PTE 的大部分现有数据均来自成年人。我们的目的是在接受重症监护病房(ICU)治疗的儿科 TBI 人群中,确定与 PTE 相关的临床和影像学危险因素。

方法

我们使用芬兰重症监护联合会数据库,确定了 2003 年至 2013 年期间在芬兰四所学术大学医院 ICU 接受治疗的儿科(<18 岁)TBI 患者。我们的主要结局是发生 PTE,定义为在 6 个月时存活的患者需要口服抗癫痫药物。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估与 PTE 相关的危险因素。

结果

在纳入研究的 290 名患者中,有 59 名(20%)发生了 PTE。中位年龄为 15 岁(四分位距 [IQR] 13-17),80%的患者入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分≤12。发生 PTE 的主要危险因素是年龄(校正优势比 [OR] 1.08,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.00-1.16)、鞍上池闭塞(OR 6.53,95% CI 1.95-21.81)和入院 GCS 评分 9-12 与 GCS 评分 13-15 相比(OR 2.88,95% CI 1.24-6.69)。

意义

我们表明,PTE 是 ICU 治疗的儿科 TBI 后常见的长期并发症。较高的年龄、中度损伤严重程度、鞍上池闭塞、ICU 期间发作和手术治疗与 PTE 风险增加相关。需要进一步研究以确定降低 PTE 风险的策略。

相似文献

1
Posttraumatic epilepsy in intensive care unit-treated pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.重症监护病房治疗的小儿创伤性脑损伤患者的创伤后癫痫。
Epilepsia. 2020 Apr;61(4):693-701. doi: 10.1111/epi.16483. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
2
Clinical characteristics and associated factors of posttraumatic epilepsy after traumatic brain injury in children: A retrospective case-control study.儿童创伤性脑损伤后创伤后癫痫的临床特征及相关因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Seizure. 2024 Feb;115:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.12.016. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
3
Posttraumatic epilepsy: long-term follow-up of children with mild traumatic brain injury.创伤后癫痫:轻度创伤性脑损伤儿童的长期随访
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Jul;20(1):64-70. doi: 10.3171/2017.2.PEDS16585. Epub 2017 May 5.
4
The clinical characteristics of posttraumatic epilepsy following moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury in children.儿童中重度颅脑损伤后创伤后癫痫的临床特征。
Seizure. 2018 May;58:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.03.018. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
5
Epilepsy after severe traumatic brain injury: frequency and injury severity.严重创伤性脑损伤后的癫痫:频率和损伤严重程度。
Brain Inj. 2020 Jun 6;34(7):889-894. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1763467.
6
Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury-associated epilepsy in western China: An analysis of multicenter data.中国西部创伤性脑损伤相关癫痫的流行病学:多中心数据分析。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Aug;164:106354. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106354. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Association of Posttraumatic Epilepsy With 1-Year Outcomes After Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤后癫痫与 1 年转归的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140191. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40191.
8
Clinical characteristics of post-traumatic epilepsy and the factors affecting the latency of PTE.创伤后癫痫的临床特征及影响 PTE 潜伏期的因素。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Aug 5;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02273-x.
9
Risk Factors and Prognosis of Early Posttraumatic Seizures in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.中重度创伤性脑损伤后早期外伤性癫痫的危险因素和预后。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Apr 1;79(4):334-341. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.5420.
10
Acute physiologic prediction of pediatric post-traumatic epilepsy.儿童创伤后癫痫的急性生理学预测。
Epilepsy Res. 2022 Jul;183:106935. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106935. Epub 2022 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Posttraumatic epilepsy in critically ill children with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤危重症患儿的创伤后癫痫。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2023 Nov;39(11):3207-3214. doi: 10.1007/s00381-023-06087-9. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
2
Incidence and risk factors of posttraumatic epilepsy following pediatric traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童创伤性脑损伤后创伤后癫痫的发生率和危险因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epilepsia. 2022 Nov;63(11):2802-2812. doi: 10.1111/epi.17398. Epub 2022 Sep 4.
3
Multimodal Neurologic Monitoring in Children With Acute Brain Injury.
儿童急性颅脑损伤的多模态神经监测。
Pediatr Neurol. 2022 Apr;129:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.01.006. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
4
Incidence of post-traumatic epilepsy following paediatric traumatic brain injury: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童创伤性脑损伤后创伤后癫痫的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 2;11(11):e054034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054034.