Suppr超能文献

绒毛膜绒毛的直接和短期培养准备。哪种方法是最佳的?

Direct and short-term culture preparation of chorionic villi. Is any one method best?

作者信息

Holmes D S, Fifer A M, Mackenzie W E, Griffiths M J, Newton J R

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Birmingham Maternity Hospital, Edgbaston, U.K.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 1988 Sep;8(7):501-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.1970080705.

Abstract

Chorionic villi from 20 diagnostic cases were prepared for cytogenetic analysis by a direct and two short-term culture methods. No significant differences were found between the methods in the quality and quantity of metaphases obtained. A further study using villi from 20 pre-termination patients indicated an inherent variation in the quality of villi resulting in inconsistent processing and variation in the response of a sample to the methods. This suggests that it would be advantageous to process the villi by more than one method.

摘要

对20例诊断病例的绒毛进行处理,采用直接法和两种短期培养法进行细胞遗传学分析。在所获得的中期分裂相的质量和数量方面,这些方法之间未发现显著差异。一项对20例终止妊娠前患者的绒毛进行的进一步研究表明,绒毛质量存在内在差异,导致处理过程不一致,以及样本对这些方法的反应存在差异。这表明采用不止一种方法处理绒毛将是有益的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验