• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危患者内镜下胆管永久支架置入治疗胆总管结石后复发性胆道梗阻的长期结果和危险因素。

Long-term outcomes and risk factors of recurrent biliary obstruction after permanent endoscopic biliary stenting for choledocholithiasis in high-risk patients.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.

出版信息

J Dig Dis. 2020 Apr;21(4):246-251. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12859. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1111/1751-2980.12859
PMID:32223015
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate the long-term outcomes of permanent endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS) and risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) in high-risk or elderly patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones.

METHODS

The electronic database of Hakodate Municipal Hospital was searched to identify elderly or high-risk patients with CBD stones who had undergone permanent EBS using a plastic stent without stone removal and were followed up between April 2011 and May 2019, with no further intervention until symptoms occurred.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 47 patients, of whom 19 (40.4%) were men, with a median age of 86 years (interquartile range 80-90 years). RBO and death without biliary disease occurred in 14 (29.8%) and 19 (40.4%) patients, respectively. The cumulative RBO rates at 20, 40, and 60 months were 22.1%, 31.8%, and 35.5%, respectively. The median time to RBO was 13.0 and 38.0 months in the group with CBD stone  ≥15 mm and 11-14 mm in diameter, respectively. The cumulative RBO incidence rate in the group with CBD stone ≤10 mm in diameter did not reach 50%. The cumulative RBO incidence rates were significantly different among the three groups based on the CBD stone diameter (competing risk analysis, P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that an increase in CBD stone diameter predicted the increased risk of RBO (hazard ratio 1.26, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent EBS is a feasible option for high-risk patients with small CBD stones.

摘要

目的

阐明永久性内镜胆道支架(EBS)的长期结果,以及高龄或高危患者胆总管(CBD)结石再发胆道梗阻(RBO)的危险因素。

方法

检索函馆市立医院电子数据库,确定 2011 年 4 月至 2019 年 5 月期间未行取石而仅采用塑料支架行永久性 EBS 治疗、且随访至出现症状时未进行进一步干预的高龄或高危 CBD 结石患者。

结果

共分析了 47 例患者,其中男 19 例(40.4%),中位年龄 86 岁(四分位距 80-90 岁)。14 例(29.8%)和 19 例(40.4%)患者分别发生 RBO 和死于非胆道疾病。20、40 和 60 个月时的累积 RBO 发生率分别为 22.1%、31.8%和 35.5%。CBD 结石直径≥15mm 和 11-14mm 组的 RBO 中位时间分别为 13.0 和 38.0 个月。CBD 结石直径≤10mm 组的累积 RBO 发生率未达到 50%。基于 CBD 结石直径,三组间的累积 RBO 发生率存在显著差异(竞争风险分析,P<0.01)。多变量分析显示 CBD 结石直径增加预测 RBO 风险增加(风险比 1.26,P=0.01)。

结论

对于小 CBD 结石的高危患者,永久性 EBS 是一种可行的选择。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes and risk factors of recurrent biliary obstruction after permanent endoscopic biliary stenting for choledocholithiasis in high-risk patients.高危患者内镜下胆管永久支架置入治疗胆总管结石后复发性胆道梗阻的长期结果和危险因素。
J Dig Dis. 2020 Apr;21(4):246-251. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.12859. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Risk factors for recurrent biliary obstruction following endoscopic biliary stenting in patients with unresectable ampullary cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.无法切除的壶腹周围癌患者内镜下胆管支架置入术后复发性胆道梗阻的危险因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Dig Dis. 2024 May;25(5):310-317. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13288. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
3
Endoscopic plastic stenting for bile duct stones: stent changing on demand or every 3 months. A prospective comparison study.内镜下塑料支架置入治疗胆管结石:按需更换支架或每 3 个月更换一次。一项前瞻性对比研究。
Endoscopy. 2013 Dec;45(12):1014-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344556. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
4
Effect of stent placement on stone recurrence and post-procedural cholangitis after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones.支架置入对胆总管结石内镜取石术后结石复发和术后胆管炎的影响。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S27-S34. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.060. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
5
Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillary Large-balloon Dilation for Common Bile Duct Stones.内镜下乳头大球囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石的长期疗效
Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;59(7):891-899. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.3881-19. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
6
Effectiveness and safety of biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients.胆管支架置入术治疗老年患者复杂胆总管结石的有效性和安全性
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;27(1):30-6. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150305. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
7
Choledocholithiasis: Long-term follow-up in patients without stone clearance at first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.胆总管结石:初次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术未清除结石患者的长期随访。
J Dig Dis. 2021 Sep;22(9):551-556. doi: 10.1111/1751-2980.13043.
8
Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术加支架置入术治疗大或多发胆总管结石。
Dig Endosc. 2011 Jul;23(3):240-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01100.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
9
Outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy open choledochotomy for common bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术与开腹胆总管切开取石术治疗胆总管结石的结局比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 28;25(4):485-497. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i4.485.
10
Long-term recurrence of bile duct stones after endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with sphincterotomy: 4-year extended follow-up of a randomized trial.内镜乳头大球囊扩张联合括约肌切开术后胆管结石的长期复发:一项随机试验的4年延长随访
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):650-655. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5012-9. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy and safety between palliative biliary stent placement and duct clearance among elderly patients with choledocholithiasis: a propensity score-matched analysis.比较老年胆石症患者姑息性胆道支架置入术与胆管清除术的疗效和安全性:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 10;21(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01956-6.