Suppr超能文献

等张与低张静脉输液在足月新生儿中的比较:是否到了停用低张液的时候。

Comparison of isotonic and hypotonic intravenous fluids in term newborns: is it time to quit hypotonic fluids.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Jan;35(2):356-361. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1718094. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Hypotonic fluids have been traditionally used in newborns. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence-2015 (NICE) fluid therapy guideline recommends the use of isotonic fluids as maintenance fluid therapy in term newborns. However, there is no clear evidence supporting this recommendation. This study aims to compare isotonic (5% dextrose in 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl)) and hypotonic (5% dextrose in 0.45% NaCl) parenteral fluid therapies in hospitalized term newborns with regard to changes in plasma Na (pNa) and complications related with fluid therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study performed in a tertiary university hospital NICU between January 2016 and April 2018. Term newborns who were initially isonatremic or mildly dysnatremic (pNa <130 or >155 meq/L) and receiving fluid therapy for maintenance or replacement therapy after 48th postnatal hours were eligible for the study. Infants having specific diagnoses requiring extraordinary fluids were excluded. The primary outcome evaluated was the change in mean plasma Na (ΔpNa meq/L/h) at 24 h or at the end of intravenous (i.v.) fluid therapy. Secondary outcomes evaluated were the risk of hyponatremia, hypernatremia, and adverse events attributable to fluid administration.

RESULTS

Among the 108 included newborns, 57 received hypotonic fluid (5% dextrose solution in 0.45% NaCl) and the remaining received isotonic fluid (5% dextrose solution in 0.9% NaCl) therapy. The hypotonic fluid group showed a greater ΔpNa compared to the isotonic group (0.48 ± 0.28 vs. 0.27 ± 0.21 meq/L/h,  = .001). The risk of experiencing unsafe plasma Na decrease in the hypotonic fluid group (ΔpNa >0.5 meq/L/h) was higher than the isotonic fluid group (odd ratio: 8.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-30.06). Six mildly hypernatremic babies between 48 and 72 h of postnatal age showed insufficient Na reduction despite the appropriate amount of fluid. No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggested that as maintenance or replacement fluid therapy in the newborn, hypotonic fluids, even 5% dextrose in 0.45% NaCl, can lead to unsafe plasma Na decreases in term newborns, while isotonic fluids are safe when started after the first few days of life. Although the results parallel NICE guidelines, before making recommendations regarding the removal of hypotonic fluids entirely from clinical practice in term newborns following the renal adaptation period; larger randomized controlled studies involving a wide range of babies are needed.

摘要

目的

传统上在新生儿中使用低张液。2015 年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)液体治疗指南建议在足月新生儿中使用等张液作为维持液治疗。然而,目前没有明确的证据支持这一建议。本研究旨在比较等张液(5%葡萄糖在 0.9%氯化钠(NaCl)中)和低张液(5%葡萄糖在 0.45%NaCl 中)在住院足月新生儿中的治疗效果,主要观察指标为血浆钠(pNa)的变化和与液体治疗相关的并发症。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,在 2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月期间在一家三级大学医院的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)进行。符合条件的新生儿为初始等张或轻度电解质紊乱(pNa<130 或>155 meq/L)且在出生后 48 小时后接受维持或补充治疗的液体疗法的足月新生儿。排除有特殊诊断需要特殊液体的婴儿。主要结局评估为 24 小时或静脉(i.v.)液体治疗结束时的平均血浆钠(ΔpNa meq/L/h)变化。次要结局评估为低钠血症、高钠血症和与液体给药相关的不良事件的风险。

结果

在纳入的 108 名新生儿中,57 名接受低张液(5%葡萄糖溶液在 0.45%NaCl 中)治疗,其余接受等张液(5%葡萄糖溶液在 0.9%NaCl 中)治疗。与等张组相比,低张组的ΔpNa更大(0.48±0.28 与 0.27±0.21 meq/L/h,=0.001)。低张液组(ΔpNa>0.5 meq/L/h)发生不安全的血浆钠下降的风险高于等张液组(比值比:8.46;95%置信区间(CI):2.3-30.06)。6 名在出生后 48 至 72 小时之间的轻度高钠血症婴儿尽管给予了适量的液体,但钠的减少仍不足。两组在其他结局方面无显著差异。

结论

本研究结果表明,作为新生儿的维持或补充液体治疗,低张液,即使是 5%葡萄糖在 0.45%NaCl 中,也会导致足月新生儿发生不安全的血浆钠下降,而等张液在出生后几天开始使用时是安全的。尽管结果与 NICE 指南一致,但在新生儿肾功能适应期后,完全从临床实践中去除低张液之前,需要进行涉及更广泛婴儿的更大规模的随机对照研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验