• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险平衡作为西班牙人群肝移植生存率预测指标的验证

Validation of the Balance of Risk as a Predictor of Liver Transplant Survival in a Spanish Population.

作者信息

Toledo Enrique, Castanedo Sonia, Tolaretxipi Erik G, Lozano Ana, Echeverri Juan, Fernández-Santiago Roberto, Anderson Edward J, Castillo Federico, Rodríguez-Sanjuan Juan Carlos

机构信息

General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.

General Surgery, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2020 Jun;52(5):1481-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.059. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.059
PMID:32224014
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Balance of Risk (BAR) score is a simple test that combines donor and recipient variables to predict liver transplant success. It has been validated in different publications, with cut-off points of between 15 and 18 points proposed depending on the region. The aim of this study is to test the validity of the BAR score and to find the optimal cut-off point for our population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 164 liver transplant patients was selected between January 2012 and July 2019. All were older than 18 years and were treated in a Spanish tertiary-level hospital.

RESULTS

The receiver operating characteristic curve between BAR and 5-year survival yields a result of 0.622 (P = .046), placing the cut-off point at ≥7 (sensitivity 61.5%, specificity 61.6%). Patients with a BAR score <7 and a BAR score ≥7 have an estimated 5-year survival of 53.91 vs 47.51 months, respectively (log rank = .032). The only 2 variables associated with increased survival were a BAR score of <7 (hazard ratio = 2.566; P < .001) and a body mass index <30 (hazard ratio = 6.667; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A low BAR score correlates well with liver transplant survival at 5 years. The BAR is a simple tool that should be used for donor-recipient matching. Due to the characteristics, resources, and population in our environment, a BAR score of 7 would be the optimum cut-off point for a liver transplant.

摘要

背景

风险平衡(BAR)评分是一种简单的测试,它结合了供体和受体变量来预测肝移植的成功率。该评分已在不同的出版物中得到验证,根据地区不同,建议的临界值在15至18分之间。本研究的目的是检验BAR评分的有效性,并为我们的人群找到最佳临界值。

材料与方法

选取2012年1月至2019年7月期间164例肝移植患者的回顾性队列。所有患者年龄均超过18岁,且在西班牙一家三级医院接受治疗。

结果

BAR评分与5年生存率之间的受试者工作特征曲线结果为0.622(P = 0.046),临界值设定为≥7(敏感性61.5%,特异性61.6%)。BAR评分<7和BAR评分≥7的患者估计5年生存率分别为53.91个月和47.51个月(对数秩检验=0.032)。与生存率增加相关的仅有的两个变量是BAR评分<7(风险比=2.566;P < 0.001)和体重指数<30(风险比=6.667;P < 0.001)。

结论

低BAR评分与肝移植5年生存率密切相关。BAR是一种应在供体-受体匹配中使用的简单工具。鉴于我们环境中的特征、资源和人群,BAR评分为7将是肝移植的最佳临界值。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Balance of Risk as a Predictor of Liver Transplant Survival in a Spanish Population.风险平衡作为西班牙人群肝移植生存率预测指标的验证
Transplant Proc. 2020 Jun;52(5):1481-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.059. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Accuracy of the BAR score in the prediction of survival after liver transplantation.BAR 评分预测肝移植术后生存率的准确性。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
3
Graft Risk Index After Liver Transplant: Internal and External Validation of a New Spanish Indicator.肝移植后的移植物风险指数:一种新的西班牙指标的内部和外部验证
Exp Clin Transplant. 2019 Dec;17(6):784-791. doi: 10.6002/ect.2018.0342. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients.BAR评分作为肝移植患者短期和长期生存预测指标的应用。
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jan;9(1):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9563-3. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
5
Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.机器学习算法可预测肝移植后的移植物失败。
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):e125-e132. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001600.
6
Validation and performance of three scoring systems for predicting primary non-function and early allograft failure after liver transplantation.三种评分系统预测肝移植后原发性无功能和早期移植物失败的验证和性能。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2024 Oct;23(5):463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
7
Donor and recipient factors predicting time to graft failure following orthotopic liver transplantation: a transplant risk index.预测原位肝移植后移植物失功时间的供体和受体因素:一种移植风险指数。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2077-82. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.06.001.
8
Improving Matching Between Recipient and Donor in Liver Transplantation: Are Scores Able to Predict Long-term Survival?提高肝移植中受者与供者的匹配度:评分能否预测长期生存?
Transplant Proc. 2022 Jan-Feb;54(1):41-44. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.11.007. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
9
Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.不同临床评分系统在评估原位肝移植术后短期和长期预后中的潜在价值和局限性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214221. eCollection 2019.
10
Is Muscle MELD a More Promising Predictor for Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?肌肉MELD评分是否是活体肝移植术后死亡率更有前景的预测指标?
Prog Transplant. 2018 Sep;28(3):213-219. doi: 10.1177/1526924818781571. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver Transplantation for Hepatocarcinoma: Results over Two Decades of a Transplantation Programme and Analysis of Factors Associated with Recurrence.肝癌的肝移植:二十年移植项目的结果及复发相关因素分析
Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 12;12(6):1302. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061302.