• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BAR 评分预测肝移植术后生存率的准确性。

Accuracy of the BAR score in the prediction of survival after liver transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Digestive Surgery & Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.

Department of Digestive Surgery & Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile.

出版信息

Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.002
PMID:31036493
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

The Balance of Risk (BAR) Score, a simple scoring system that combines six independent donor and recipient variables to predict outcome after liver transplantation (LT), was validated in a large U.S./European cohort of patients. This study aims to assess the performance of the BAR score to predict survival after liver transplantation and determine the factors associated with short and long-term survival in Latin-American patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 194 patients [112 (55.4%) males; mean age 52±14 years] who underwent 202 LT during the period 2003-2015. Demographic, clinical, pathological and surgical variables, as well as mortality and survival rates, were analyzed. The BAR score was investigated through a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve with the calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the predictive score power for 3-month, 1 and 5-year mortality in a matched donor-recipient cohort. Youden index was calculated to identify optimal cutoff points.

RESULTS

The AUC of BAR score in predicting 3-month, 1-year and 5-year mortality were 0.755 (CI95% 0.689-0.812), 0.702 (CI95% 0.634-0.764) and 0.610 (CI95% 0.539-0.678) respectively. The best cut-off point was a BAR score ≥15 points. In the multivariate analysis BAR score <15 was associated with higher survival rates at 3 months and 1 and 5-years.

CONCLUSIONS

BAR score <15 points is an independent predictor of better short and long-term survival in Latin-American patients undergoing LT. The BAR scoring system has an adequate diagnostic capacity allowing to predict 3 and 12-month mortality.

摘要

简介和目的

风险平衡(BAR)评分是一种简单的评分系统,它结合了六个独立的供体和受体变量,以预测肝移植(LT)后的结果。该评分系统在美国/欧洲的大型患者队列中得到了验证。本研究旨在评估 BAR 评分预测肝移植后生存率的表现,并确定与拉丁美洲患者短期和长期生存率相关的因素。

材料和方法

对 194 例患者(112 例男性,55.4%;平均年龄 52±14 岁)进行回顾性队列研究,这些患者在 2003 年至 2015 年期间接受了 202 例 LT。分析了人口统计学、临床、病理和手术变量以及死亡率和生存率。通过计算曲线下面积(AUC)来评估 3 个月、1 年和 5 年死亡率的预测评分能力,对 BAR 评分进行了接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析。计算了约登指数以确定最佳截断点。

结果

BAR 评分预测 3 个月、1 年和 5 年死亡率的 AUC 分别为 0.755(95%CI95%为 0.689-0.812)、0.702(95%CI95%为 0.634-0.764)和 0.610(95%CI95%为 0.539-0.678)。最佳截断点为 BAR 评分≥15 分。在多变量分析中,BAR 评分<15 与 3 个月和 1 年和 5 年的生存率较高相关。

结论

BAR 评分<15 分是拉丁美洲患者 LT 后短期和长期生存的独立预测因子。BAR 评分系统具有足够的诊断能力,可以预测 3 个月和 12 个月的死亡率。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of the BAR score in the prediction of survival after liver transplantation.BAR 评分预测肝移植术后生存率的准确性。
Ann Hepatol. 2019 Mar-Apr;18(2):386-392. doi: 10.1016/j.aohep.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
2
Validation of the Balance of Risk as a Predictor of Liver Transplant Survival in a Spanish Population.风险平衡作为西班牙人群肝移植生存率预测指标的验证
Transplant Proc. 2020 Jun;52(5):1481-1485. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2020.02.059. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
3
Potential value and limitations of different clinical scoring systems in the assessment of short- and long-term outcome following orthotopic liver transplantation.不同临床评分系统在评估原位肝移植术后短期和长期预后中的潜在价值和局限性。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214221. eCollection 2019.
4
Validation and performance of three scoring systems for predicting primary non-function and early allograft failure after liver transplantation.三种评分系统预测肝移植后原发性无功能和早期移植物失败的验证和性能。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2024 Oct;23(5):463-471. doi: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
5
Proposal for a New Predictive Model of Short-Term Mortality After Living Donor Liver Transplantation due to Acute Liver Failure.关于活体肝移植治疗急性肝衰竭后短期死亡率新预测模型的提案。
Ann Transplant. 2017 Feb 21;22:101-107. doi: 10.12659/aot.901771.
6
Application of the BAR score as a predictor of short- and long-term survival in liver transplantation patients.BAR评分作为肝移植患者短期和长期生存预测指标的应用。
Hepatol Int. 2015 Jan;9(1):113-9. doi: 10.1007/s12072-014-9563-3. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
7
BAR Score Performance in Predicting Survival after Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.BAR 评分在预测活体肝移植术后生存中的表现:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb 18;2022:2877859. doi: 10.1155/2022/2877859. eCollection 2022.
8
A good prognostic predictor for liver transplantation recipients with benign end-stage liver cirrhosis.对于良性终末期肝硬化的肝移植受者而言,一种良好的预后预测指标。
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2017 Apr;16(2):164-168. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(16)60187-x.
9
Identifying patients at higher risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation in a multicenter cohort study from Argentina.在一项来自阿根廷的多中心队列研究中,识别肝移植后肝细胞癌复发风险较高的患者。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Apr;28(4):421-7. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000551.
10
Survival outcomes scores (SOFT, BAR, and Pedi-SOFT) are accurate in predicting post-liver transplant survival in adolescents.生存结局评分(SOFT、BAR和儿童SOFT)在预测青少年肝移植后的生存情况方面是准确的。
Pediatr Transplant. 2016 Sep;20(6):807-12. doi: 10.1111/petr.12770. Epub 2016 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiology and health assessment, risk balance, and model for end-stage liver disease scores: Postoperative outcome of liver transplantation.生理学与健康评估、风险平衡以及终末期肝病评分模型:肝移植术后结局
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):95899. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.95899.
2
Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation.肝脏移植评估的视角与工具:肝脏移植的变革时代
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 17;13(2):494. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020494.
3
Sarcopenia As a Predictor of Survival and Complications of Patients With Cirrhosis After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
肌肉减少症作为肝移植后肝硬化患者生存和并发症的预测指标:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Clin Transplant. 2025 Feb;39(2):e70088. doi: 10.1111/ctr.70088.
4
A Brief Model Evaluated Outcomes After Liver Transplantation Based on the Matching of Donor Graft and Recipient.一种基于供体移植物与受体匹配情况评估肝移植术后结局的简要模型。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 1;16(1):e00761. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000761.
5
Influence of donor age on liver transplantation outcomes: A multivariate analysis and comparative study.供体年龄对肝移植结局的影响:多因素分析与比较研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Feb 27;16(2):331-344. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i2.331.
6
The BAR Score Predicts and Stratifies Outcomes Following Liver Retransplantation: Insights From a Retrospective Cohort Study.BAR 评分可预测和分层肝移植后结局:来自回顾性队列研究的见解。
Transpl Int. 2024 Jan 16;37:12104. doi: 10.3389/ti.2024.12104. eCollection 2024.
7
The Impact of Donor Risk Index, Recipients' and Operative Characteristics on Post Liver Transplant One-Year Graft Failure: A Cohort Analysis.供体风险指数、受者及手术特征对肝移植术后一年移植物失败的影响:一项队列分析。
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 28;30(4):275-282. doi: 10.1159/000524421. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Use of machine learning models for identification of predictors of survival and tumour recurrence in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma.使用机器学习模型识别肝细胞癌肝移植受者的生存和肿瘤复发预测因素。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Aug 30;11(10):345. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6469. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
9
Diagnosing HFpEF and Predicting ESLD Liver Transplant Outcome Using HFA-PEFF Score.使用HFA-PEFF评分诊断射血分数保留的心力衰竭并预测终末期肝病肝移植结局
JACC Asia. 2023 Jun 20;3(3):518-520. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.04.005. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Selecting DCD Recipients Using Predictive Indices.使用预测指标选择心脏死亡器官捐献受者。
Transplant Direct. 2023 Mar 29;9(4):e1467. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001467. eCollection 2023 Apr.