• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去人性化在集体暴力中的重要性有限。

The limited importance of dehumanization in collective violence.

作者信息

Lang Johannes

机构信息

Danish Institute for International Studies, Østbanegade 117, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.002
PMID:32224432
Abstract

Perpetrators of collective violence allegedly dehumanize their victims. Psychologists often operationalize dehumanization as a social-cognitive process that turns people into beings whose thoughts, feelings, and relationships are of no concern to the perpetrators. The theory is that this process is an essential mechanism in intergroup violence. But a growing number of researchers from a variety of disciplines are pointing out the theoretical and empirical limitations of the dehumanization thesis. Some psychologists go so far as to argue that the thesis is mistaken. As this review shows, the explanatory value of 'dehumanization' is now in doubt. Whatever its intuitive appeal, the psychological concept of dehumanization might do more to distort than illuminate the history of collective violence.

摘要

据称,集体暴力的实施者将受害者不当人看。心理学家常常将“不当人看”作为一种社会认知过程来进行研究,该过程会把人变成这样的存在:其思想、情感及人际关系都不为施暴者所关心。理论认为,这一过程是群体间暴力的一种重要机制。但越来越多来自不同学科的研究人员指出了“不当人看”这一论点在理论和实证方面的局限性。一些心理学家甚至认为该论点是错误的。正如本综述所示,“不当人看”的解释价值如今受到质疑。无论其直观上多么有吸引力,“不当人看”这一心理学概念对于集体暴力历史的扭曲作用可能大于阐释作用。

相似文献

1
The limited importance of dehumanization in collective violence.去人性化在集体暴力中的重要性有限。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Dehumanization increases instrumental violence, but not moral violence.去人性化会增加工具性暴力,但不会增加道德性暴力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 8;114(32):8511-8516. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705238114. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
3
Questioning dehumanization: intersubjective dimensions of violence in the Nazi concentration and death camps.对非人性化的质疑:纳粹集中营和死亡营中暴力的主体间维度
Holocaust Genocide Stud. 2010;24(2):225-46. doi: 10.1093/hgs/dcq026.
4
Dehumanization in female victims of intimate partner violence.亲密伴侣暴力女性受害者所遭受的非人性化对待。
J Inj Violence Res. 2023 Jan 8;15(1):83-95. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v15i1.1676.
5
Dehumanization: trends, insights, and challenges.去人性化:趋势、洞察与挑战。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Mar;26(3):222-240. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
6
Objects Do Not Suffer: An Impact of Mechanistic Dehumanization on Perceptions of Women's Suffering and Lack of Justice in Domestic Assault.物品不会受苦:机械性非人化对家庭暴力中女性苦难认知及缺乏正义之感的影响
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Mar;39(5-6):1245-1267. doi: 10.1177/08862605231204897. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
7
Why we dehumanize illegal immigrants: A US mixed-methods study.为何我们会将非法移民非人化:一项美国混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0257912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257912. eCollection 2021.
8
The ascent of man: Theoretical and empirical evidence for blatant dehumanization.人类的堕落:公然非人化的理论与实证依据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 Nov;109(5):901-31. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000048. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence.群体美化、道德推脱与集体暴力情境下的公正
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Aug;36(8):1115-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167210376391.
10
Dehumanization and the lack of social connection.去人性化和缺乏社会联系。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:312-316. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Attribution of undesirable character traits, rather than trait-based dehumanization, predicts punishment decisions.不良性格特征的归因,而非基于特质的非人化,预测惩罚决策。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 17;11(7):240087. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240087. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Animalistic dehumanisation as a social influence strategy.将人兽化作为一种社会影响策略。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 11;13:999959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.999959. eCollection 2022.
3
Dehumanization and mass violence: A study of mental state language in Nazi propaganda (1927-1945).
去人性化和大规模暴力:纳粹宣传中的精神状态语言研究(1927-1945)。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0274957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274957. eCollection 2022.
4
Reduced helping intentions are better explained by the attribution of antisocial emotions than by 'infrahumanization'.减少帮助意愿可以更好地归因于反社会情绪,而不是“去人性化”。
Sci Rep. 2022 May 12;12(1):7824. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10460-0.
5
Intergroup preference, not dehumanization, explains social biases in emotion attribution.群体间偏好而非去人性化解释了情感归因中的社会偏见。
Cognition. 2021 Nov;216:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104865. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
6
Gender, Anxiety, and Legitimation of Violence in Adolescents Facing Simulated Physical Aggression at School.面临校园模拟身体攻击的青少年的性别、焦虑与暴力合法化
Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 3;11(4):458. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11040458.
7
No convincing evidence outgroups are denied uniquely human characteristics: Distinguishing intergroup preference from trait-based dehumanization.没有令人信服的证据表明外群体被剥夺了独特的人类特征:区分基于特质的去人性化与群体间偏好。
Cognition. 2021 Jul;212:104682. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104682. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Falsifying the Dehumanization Hypothesis.证伪去人性化假说。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):33-38. doi: 10.1177/1745691620969657. Epub 2020 Nov 30.