Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性卒中的血管内治疗

Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.

作者信息

Silva Gisele S, Nogueira Raul G

出版信息

Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2020 Apr;26(2):310-331. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000852.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the actual indications for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and how the opportunities for endovascular therapy can be expanded by using the concept of clinical-imaging or perfusion-imaging mismatch (as a surrogate for salvageable tissue) rather than time of ischemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Six randomized controlled trials undoubtedly confirmed the benefits of using endovascular thrombectomy on the clinical outcome of patients with stroke with large vessel occlusion within 6 hours from symptom onset compared with those receiving only standard medical care. In a meta-analysis of individual patient data, the number needed to treat with endovascular thrombectomy to reduce disability by at least one level on the modified Rankin Scale for one patient was 2.6. Recently, the concept of "tissue window" versus time window has proved useful for selecting patients for mechanical thrombectomy up to 24 hours from symptom onset. The DAWN (DWI or CTP Assessment With Clinical Mismatch in the Triage of Wake-Up and Late Presenting Strokes Undergoing Neurointervention) trial included patients at a median of 12.5 hours from onset and showed the largest effect in functional outcome ever described in any acute stroke treatment trial (35.5% increase in functional independence). In DEFUSE 3 (Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 3), patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy at a median of 11 hours after onset had a 28% increase in functional independence and an additional 20% absolute reduction in death or severe disability.

SUMMARY

For patients with acute ischemic stroke and a large vessel occlusion in the proximal anterior circulation who can be treated within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset, mechanical thrombectomy with a second-generation stent retriever or a catheter aspiration device should be indicated regardless of whether the patient received treatment with intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) in patients with limited signs of early ischemic changes on neuroimaging. Two clinical trials completely disrupted the time window concept in acute ischemic stroke, showing excellent clinical outcomes in patients treated up to 24 hours from symptom onset. Time of ischemia is, on average, a good biomarker for tissue viability; however, the window of opportunity for treatment varies across different individuals because of a range of compensatory mechanisms. Adjusting time to the adequacy of collateral flow leads to the concept of tissue window, a paradigm shift in stroke reperfusion therapy.

摘要

综述目的:本文回顾了急性缺血性卒中患者进行机械取栓的实际指征,以及如何通过运用临床影像或灌注影像不匹配的概念(作为可挽救组织的替代指标)而非缺血时间来扩大血管内治疗的机会。

近期研究结果:六项随机对照试验无疑证实了与仅接受标准药物治疗的患者相比,对症状发作6小时内发生大血管闭塞的卒中患者进行血管内取栓对临床结局有益。在一项个体患者数据的荟萃分析中,使用血管内取栓使一名患者在改良Rankin量表上残疾程度至少降低一级所需治疗的患者数为2.6。最近,“组织窗”与时间窗的概念已被证明有助于选择症状发作后长达24小时内进行机械取栓的患者。DAWN(对接受神经介入治疗的醒后和延迟就诊卒中进行分诊时基于临床不匹配的DWI或CTP评估)试验纳入了中位发病时间为12.5小时的患者,并显示出在任何急性卒中治疗试验中所描述的对功能结局的最大影响(功能独立性增加35.5%)。在DEFUSE 3(用于理解卒中演变的弥散和灌注成像评估3)试验中,中位发病时间为11小时后接受机械取栓治疗的患者功能独立性增加28%,死亡或严重残疾的绝对风险额外降低20%。

总结:对于急性缺血性卒中且近端前循环大血管闭塞、能在卒中症状发作6小时内接受治疗的患者,无论其神经影像上早期缺血改变迹象是否有限,若患者接受了静脉注射重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)治疗,均应使用第二代支架取栓器或导管抽吸装置进行机械取栓。两项临床试验彻底颠覆了急性缺血性卒中的时间窗概念,显示症状发作后长达24小时接受治疗的患者临床结局良好。平均而言,缺血时间是组织存活能力的良好生物标志物;然而,由于一系列代偿机制,不同个体的治疗机会窗各不相同。根据侧支血流充足程度调整时间引出了组织窗的概念,这是卒中再灌注治疗的一个范式转变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验