Suppr超能文献

运动能力训练的实施:在学校还是在线?一项针对高中运动员的试点研究。

Movement Competency Training Delivery: At School or Online? A Pilot Study of High-School Athletes.

作者信息

Rogers Simon A, Hassmén Peter, Roberts Alexandra H, Alcock Alison, Gilleard Wendy L, Warmenhoven John S

机构信息

School of Health & Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore 2480, NSW, Australia.

Applied Technology and Innovation, Australian Institute of Sport, Bruce, 2617 ACT, Australia.

出版信息

Sports (Basel). 2020 Mar 26;8(4):39. doi: 10.3390/sports8040039.

Abstract

Movement competency (MC) development of high-school athletes can prepare them for the requirements of physical preparation training and the demands of sport. The aim of this study was to explore the physical effects of and athlete compliance to coach-led versus self-directed training approaches in this population. Thirty-nine high-school athletes (19 male, 14.5 ± 0.3 years old; 20 female, 14.6 ± 0.3 years) were allocated into two groups for a physical preparation program to improve MC. Groups were prescribed either (i) one face-to-face and one online (F2F, = 18), or (ii) two online (OL, = 21) sessions per week for 16-weeks. Before and after the intervention, the Athlete Introductory Movement Screen (AIMS) was used to assess MC alongside common physical capacity measures (triple-hop, star-excursion balance, medicine ball throw, 40m sprint and countermovement jump). Dropout left 22 participants with pre-post physical scores. Compliance with online training was low and F2F session attendance moderate. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to assess participant perceptions following the intervention. Assessing individual responses, the F2F group had a higher proportion of positive responders to AIMS scores, yet capacity measures were inconclusive across groups. Face-to-face coaching when acquiring MCs as part of physical preparation, may provide greater positive perceptions towards training compared to self-directed online prescriptions, and thereby greater compliance.

摘要

高中运动员的运动能力(MC)发展可为他们的体能训练要求和运动需求做好准备。本研究的目的是探讨在该人群中,教练主导与自主训练方法对运动员的身体影响以及运动员的依从性。39名高中运动员(19名男性,14.5±0.3岁;20名女性,14.6±0.3岁)被分为两组,参加一项旨在提高MC的体能训练计划。两组分别被规定为:(i)每周一次面对面和一次在线(F2F,n = 18),或(ii)每周两次在线(OL,n = 21),为期16周。在干预前后,使用运动员入门运动筛查(AIMS)来评估MC,同时采用常见的身体能力测量指标(三级跳、星形偏移平衡、药球投掷、40米短跑和纵跳)。退出导致22名参与者有干预前后的身体评分。在线训练的依从性较低,面对面课程的出勤率中等。干预后进行了半结构化访谈,以评估参与者的看法。评估个体反应时,F2F组对AIMS评分的积极反应者比例较高,但各指标在两组间的结果尚无定论。在作为体能训练一部分获取MC时,面对面指导与自主在线训练相比,可能会让运动员对训练有更积极的看法,从而提高依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/337a/7240720/85c5250e486b/sports-08-00039-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验