Department of Health Policy and Management, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 26;17(7):2235. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072235.
This study used the Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O) and Threats (T) (SWOT) analysis method, drawing on our experience of the response to the 2003 SARS epidemic, the 2019 China Health Statistics Yearbook data, and changes in China's policy environment for the pneumonia epidemic response relating to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) infection, to perform a systematic analysis of the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control strategy S, W, O, and T, with a further analysis of a strategic foundation and to determine a significant and relative strategy. We assessed and formulated strength-opportunity (SO), weakness-opportunity (WO), strength-threat (ST), and weakness-threat (WT) strategies for the prevention and control of the COVID-19 epidemic. We conducted an in-depth analysis and identified the highest-priority policies. These are: reshaping the emergency system (SO1); adding health emergency departments to universities and other institutions (WO2); adjusting the economic structure and strengthening international and domestic linkages (ST2); and strengthening public intervention in responding to public health emergencies (WT1).
本研究采用了优势（Strengths，S）、劣势（Weaknesses，W）、机会（Opportunities，O）和威胁（Threats，T）（SWOT）分析方法，借鉴了我们应对 2003 年 SARS 疫情的经验、2019 年中国卫生统计年鉴数据，以及中国与新型冠状病毒（COVID-19）感染相关的肺炎疫情应对政策环境的变化，对 COVID-19 疫情防控策略 S、W、O 和 T 进行了系统分析，并进一步分析了战略基础，确定了重要的和相对的战略。我们评估并制定了 COVID-19 疫情防控的优势-机会（SO）、劣势-机会（WO）、优势-威胁（ST）和劣势-威胁（WT）策略。我们进行了深入分析，确定了优先级最高的政策。这些政策包括：重塑应急系统（SO1）；在大学和其他机构增设卫生应急部门（WO2）；调整经济结构，加强国际和国内联系（ST2）；加强公众干预应对公共卫生突发事件（WT1）。
