Brown Nik, Faulkner Alex, Kent Julie, Michael Mike
1Department of Sociology, Science and Technology Studies Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD UK.
2Cardiff University School of Social Sciences, University of Cardiff, 0.75 Glamorgan Building, 2.02 53 Park Place, Cardiff, CF10 3WT UK.
Soc Theory Health. 2006;4(1):1-24. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.sth.8700062. Epub 2006 Feb 8.
This paper explores the institutional regulation of novel biosciences, hybrid technologies that often disturb and challenge existing regulatory frameworks. Developing a conceptual vocabulary for understanding the relationship between material and institutional hybrids, the paper compares human tissue engineering (TE) and xenotransplantation (XT), areas of innovation which regulators have sought to govern separately and in isolation from one another. Contrasting definitional boundaries and regulatory mechanisms partition them socio-institutionally. But despite these attempts at purification, TE and XT have proven increasingly difficult to tell apart in practical and material terms. Human and animal matters, cell cultures and tissue products have much greater corporeal connection than has been institutionally recognized, and are therefore a source of acute instability in the regulation of implants and transplants. This paper tells the story of how the messy worlds of TE and XT have leaked into one another, calling into question the abilities of regulation to adequately control hybrid innovations.
本文探讨了新型生物科学的制度性监管,这些混合技术常常扰乱并挑战现有的监管框架。本文通过开发一套概念性词汇来理解物质与制度混合体之间的关系,比较了人类组织工程(TE)和异种移植(XT)这两个创新领域,监管机构一直试图将它们分开并孤立地进行管理。不同的定义边界和监管机制在社会制度层面将它们区分开来。但尽管有这些纯化的尝试,事实证明,TE和XT在实际和物质层面越来越难以区分。人类和动物事务、细胞培养和组织产品之间的实体联系比制度层面所认识到的要紧密得多,因此是植入物和移植监管中严重不稳定的一个来源。本文讲述了TE和XT的混乱世界是如何相互渗透的,对监管机构充分控制混合创新的能力提出了质疑。