Lentzos Filippa
BIOS Centre, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE UK.
Biosocieties. 2006;1(4):453-464. doi: 10.1017/S1745855206004066. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
This article considers how threats become constituted as problems requiring policy responses, and how one might account for such problematizations and responses. Focusing specifically on the threat from bioterrorism, it draws on a broadly constructivist approach to risk, and highlights how ideas around political rationalities, styles of thought, forms of risk and frameworks of knowledge can be useful in thinking about emerging biosecurity policies. It suggests that a comparative study of Britain and the United States might help to clarify how the threat of bioterrorism is being constructed by various groups, how support for particular 'framings' of the threat is being mobilized and taken up in policy networks, and how this is linked to different courses of action in response to the possibility of bioterrorism.
本文探讨了威胁如何被建构为需要政策应对的问题,以及如何解释这种问题化及应对措施。具体聚焦于生物恐怖主义的威胁,本文借鉴了一种宽泛的建构主义风险方法,并强调围绕政治理性、思维方式、风险形式和知识框架的理念如何有助于思考新兴的生物安全政策。本文表明,对英国和美国进行比较研究可能有助于阐明生物恐怖主义威胁是如何被不同群体建构的,对威胁的特定“框架”的支持是如何在政策网络中被动员和接受的,以及这如何与应对生物恐怖主义可能性的不同行动方针相联系。