• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rationality, Risk and Response: A Research Agenda for Biosecurity.理性、风险与应对:生物安全研究议程
Biosocieties. 2006;1(4):453-464. doi: 10.1017/S1745855206004066. Epub 2006 Dec 5.
2
Accelerating Action in Global Health Security: Global Biosecurity Dialogue as a Model for Advancing the Global Health Security Agenda.加速全球卫生安全行动:全球生物安保对话作为推进全球卫生安全议程的典范。
Health Secur. 2019 Nov/Dec;17(6):495-503. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0121.
3
Managing biosecurity threats in China.应对中国的生物安全威胁。
Biosecur Bioterror. 2011 Mar;9(1):31-40. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2010.0060. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
4
Biodefense Policy Analysis-A Systems-based Approach.生物防御政策分析——一种基于系统的方法。
Health Secur. 2019 Mar/Apr;17(2):83-99. doi: 10.1089/hs.2018.0082. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
5
From biodefence to biosecurity: the Obama administration's strategy for countering biological threats.从生物防御到生物安保:奥巴马政府应对生物威胁的战略。
Int Aff. 2012;88(1):131-48. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01061.x.
6
The insider threat--a new aspect of biosecurity.内部人员威胁——生物安全的一个新方面。
J Healthc Prot Manage. 2013;29(2):16-25.
7
Economic aspects of agricultural and food biosecurity.农业与食品生物安全的经济层面
Biosecur Bioterror. 2008 Mar;6(1):66-77. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2007.0016.
8
Strategic dilemmas of biosecurity in the European Union.欧盟生物安全的战略困境
Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(1):17-23. doi: 10.1089/153871304322964309.
9
A Systems Approach to Agricultural Biosecurity.农业生物安保的系统方法。
Health Secur. 2018 Jan/Feb;16(1):58-68. doi: 10.1089/hs.2017.0035. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
10
Bioterrorism and smallpox: policies, practices, and implications for social work.生物恐怖主义与天花:政策、实践及对社会工作的影响
Soc Work. 2005 Apr;50(2):119-27. doi: 10.1093/sw/50.2.119.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer screening in Portugal: sex differences in prevalence, awareness of organized programmes and perception of benefits and adverse effects.葡萄牙的癌症筛查:患病率的性别差异、对组织化筛查项目的知晓情况以及对益处和不良反应的认知
Health Expect. 2017 Apr;20(2):211-220. doi: 10.1111/hex.12450. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
2
Criminal genomic pragmatism: prisoners' representations of DNA technology and biosecurity.刑事基因组实用主义:囚犯对DNA技术和生物安全的认知
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:592364. doi: 10.1155/2012/592364. Epub 2012 Jun 25.
3
The "biosecuritization" of healthcare delivery: examples of post-9/11 technological imperatives.医疗服务的“生物安保化”:9·11 后技术必要性的实例。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):545-52. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.017. Epub 2010 Nov 27.

理性、风险与应对:生物安全研究议程

Rationality, Risk and Response: A Research Agenda for Biosecurity.

作者信息

Lentzos Filippa

机构信息

BIOS Centre, London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE UK.

出版信息

Biosocieties. 2006;1(4):453-464. doi: 10.1017/S1745855206004066. Epub 2006 Dec 5.

DOI:10.1017/S1745855206004066
PMID:32226466
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7099267/
Abstract

This article considers how threats become constituted as problems requiring policy responses, and how one might account for such problematizations and responses. Focusing specifically on the threat from bioterrorism, it draws on a broadly constructivist approach to risk, and highlights how ideas around political rationalities, styles of thought, forms of risk and frameworks of knowledge can be useful in thinking about emerging biosecurity policies. It suggests that a comparative study of Britain and the United States might help to clarify how the threat of bioterrorism is being constructed by various groups, how support for particular 'framings' of the threat is being mobilized and taken up in policy networks, and how this is linked to different courses of action in response to the possibility of bioterrorism.

摘要

本文探讨了威胁如何被建构为需要政策应对的问题,以及如何解释这种问题化及应对措施。具体聚焦于生物恐怖主义的威胁,本文借鉴了一种宽泛的建构主义风险方法,并强调围绕政治理性、思维方式、风险形式和知识框架的理念如何有助于思考新兴的生物安全政策。本文表明,对英国和美国进行比较研究可能有助于阐明生物恐怖主义威胁是如何被不同群体建构的,对威胁的特定“框架”的支持是如何在政策网络中被动员和接受的,以及这如何与应对生物恐怖主义可能性的不同行动方针相联系。