J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Apr 1;120(4):273-282. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.044.
Various forms of simulation-based training, including training models, increase training opportunities and help assess performance of a task. However, commercial training models for lumbar puncture and epidural procedures are costly.
To assess medical students' and residents' perception of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed lumbar, cervical, and pelvic models for mastering joint injection techniques and to determine the utility of ultrasonography-guided needle procedure training.
Osteopathic medical students and residents used in-house 3D-printed gel joint models during an injection ultrasonography laboratory for mastering lumbar epidural, caudal epidural, sacroiliac, and facet joint injection techniques. After the laboratory, they answered a 17-item survey about their perception of the importance of the models in medical education and future practice. The survey also evaluated comfort levels with performing joint injections after using the models, overall satisfaction with the models, and likelihood of using models in the future.
Thirty-six medical students and residents participated. Both students and residents agreed that 3D-printed models were easy to use, aided understanding of corresponding procedures, and increased comfort with performing joint injections (all P<.001). Most participants (35 [97.2%]) believed that the models were reasonable alternatives to commercial models. Over half felt capable of successfully performing cervical or pelvic (22 [61.1%]) and lumbar epidural (23 [63.9%]) injections. The majority of participants (34 [94.4%]) would like to use the models in the future for personal training purposes. Overall, 100% believed that the 3D-printed models were a useful tool for injection training.
Results suggest that 3D-printed models provided realistic training experience for injection procedures and seemed to allow participants to quickly master new injection techniques. These models offer a visual representation of human anatomy and could be a cost-saving alternative to commercial trainers.
各种基于模拟的培训形式,包括培训模型,都增加了培训机会,并有助于评估任务的执行情况。然而,腰椎穿刺和硬膜外程序的商业培训模型成本高昂。
评估医学生和住院医师对用于掌握关节注射技术的 3 维(3D)打印腰椎、颈椎和骨盆模型的看法,并确定超声引导下针程序训练的实用性。
整骨医学学生和住院医师在注射超声实验室中使用内部 3D 打印凝胶关节模型来掌握腰椎硬膜外、骶管硬膜外、骶髂和关节突关节注射技术。在实验室之后,他们回答了一份关于模型在医学教育和未来实践中的重要性的 17 项调查。该调查还评估了使用模型后进行关节注射的舒适度、对模型的总体满意度以及未来使用模型的可能性。
36 名医学生和住院医师参与了研究。学生和住院医师都认为 3D 打印模型易于使用,有助于理解相应的程序,并增加了进行关节注射的舒适度(均 P<.001)。大多数参与者(35 [97.2%])认为模型是商业模型的合理替代品。超过一半的人认为自己有能力成功进行颈椎或骨盆(22 [61.1%])和腰椎硬膜外(23 [63.9%])注射。大多数参与者(34 [94.4%])希望将来出于个人培训目的使用模型。总的来说,100%的人认为 3D 打印模型是注射培训的有用工具。
结果表明,3D 打印模型为注射程序提供了逼真的培训体验,似乎使参与者能够快速掌握新的注射技术。这些模型提供了人体解剖结构的直观表示,并且可以作为商业培训师的成本节约替代方案。