Dermatology Center of North Mississippi, Tupelo, Mississippi.
Castle Biosciences, Inc, Friendswood, Texas.
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Sep;83(3):745-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.053. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Multiple studies have reported on the accuracy of the prognostic 31-gene expression profile test for cutaneous melanoma. Consistency of the test results across studies has not been systematically evaluated.
To assess the robustness of the prognostic value of the 31-gene expression profile.
Raw data were obtained from studies identified from systematic review. A meta-analysis was performed to determine overall effect of the 31-gene expression profile. Clinical outcome metrics for the 31-gene expression profile were compared with American Joint Committee on Cancer staging.
Three studies met inclusion criteria; data from a novel cohort of 211 patients were included (n = 1,479). Five-year recurrence-free and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 91.4% and 94.1% for Class 1A patients and 43.6% and 55.5% for Class 2B patients (P < .0001). Meta-analysis results showed that Class 2 was significantly associated with recurrence (hazard ratio 2.90; P < .0001) and distant metastasis (hazard ratio 2.75; P < .0001). The 31-gene expression profile identified American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I to III patient subsets with high likelihood for recurrence and distant metastasis. Sensitivity was 76% (95% confidence interval 71%-80%) and 76% (95% confidence interval 70%-82%) for each end point, respectively. When 31-gene expression profile and sentinel lymph node biopsy results were considered together, sensitivity and negative predictive value for distant metastasis-free survival were both improved.
The 31-gene expression profile test consistently and accurately identifies melanoma patients at increased risk of metastasis, is independent of other clinicopathologic covariates, and augments current risk stratification by reclassifying patients for heightened surveillance who were previously designated as being at low risk.
多项研究报告了预测性 31 基因表达谱检测在皮肤黑色素瘤中的准确性。但尚未系统评估研究结果的一致性。
评估 31 基因表达谱预后价值的稳健性。
从系统评价中确定的研究中获取原始数据。进行荟萃分析以确定 31 基因表达谱的总体影响。将 31 基因表达谱的临床结局指标与美国癌症联合委员会分期进行比较。
三项研究符合纳入标准;纳入了一项新的 211 例患者队列的数据(n=1479)。对于 Class 1A 患者,5 年无复发生存率和远处无转移生存率分别为 91.4%和 94.1%,对于 Class 2B 患者分别为 43.6%和 55.5%(P<0.0001)。荟萃分析结果显示,Class 2 与复发(风险比 2.90;P<0.0001)和远处转移(风险比 2.75;P<0.0001)显著相关。31 基因表达谱鉴定出美国癌症联合委员会 I 期至 III 期患者亚组,这些患者具有较高的复发和远处转移可能性。对于每个终点,敏感性分别为 76%(95%置信区间 71%-80%)和 76%(95%置信区间 70%-82%)。当同时考虑 31 基因表达谱和前哨淋巴结活检结果时,远处无转移生存率的敏感性和阴性预测值均得到提高。
31 基因表达谱检测能够持续、准确地识别具有较高转移风险的黑色素瘤患者,独立于其他临床病理协变量,并且通过重新分类之前被认为风险较低的患者来增强当前的风险分层,从而提高了监测的针对性。