• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当将在线美国联合癌症委员会个体化黑色素瘤患者预后预测工具与基于 31 个基因表达谱的分类相结合时,可以提高高危皮肤黑色素瘤肿瘤的识别能力。

Identification of high-risk cutaneous melanoma tumors is improved when combining the online American Joint Committee on Cancer Individualized Melanoma Patient Outcome Prediction Tool with a 31-gene expression profile-based classification.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

National Society for Cutaneous Medicine, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):818-825.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.051. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.051
PMID:28110997
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)-defined early-stage cutaneous melanoma have disease recurrence and die. A 31-gene expression profile (GEP) that accurately assesses metastatic risk associated with primary cutaneous melanomas has been described.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare accuracy of the GEP in combination with risk determined using the web-based AJCC Individualized Melanoma Patient Outcome Prediction Tool.

METHODS

GEP results from 205 stage I/II cutaneous melanomas with sufficient clinical data for prognostication using the AJCC tool were classified as low (class 1) or high (class 2) risk. Two 5-year overall survival cutoffs (AJCC 79% and 68%), reflecting survival for patients with stage IIA or IIB disease, respectively, were assigned for binary AJCC risk.

RESULTS

Cox univariate analysis revealed significant risk classification of distant metastasis-free and overall survival (hazard ratio range 3.2-9.4, P < .001) for both tools. In all, 43 (21%) cases had discordant GEP and AJCC classification (using 79% cutoff). Eleven of 13 (85%) deaths in that group were predicted as high risk by GEP but low risk by AJCC.

LIMITATIONS

Specimens reflect tertiary care center referrals; more effective therapies have been approved for clinical use after accrual.

CONCLUSIONS

The GEP provides valuable prognostic information and improves identification of high-risk melanomas when used together with the AJCC online prediction tool.

摘要

背景

相当一部分 AJCC 定义的早期皮肤黑色素瘤患者会出现疾病复发和死亡。已经描述了一种能够准确评估原发性皮肤黑色素瘤相关转移风险的 31 基因表达谱(GEP)。

目的

我们旨在比较 GEP 与基于网络的 AJCC 个体化黑色素瘤患者预后预测工具联合使用时的准确性。

方法

对 205 例 I/II 期皮肤黑色素瘤患者的 GEP 结果进行分析,这些患者具有足够的临床数据,可使用 AJCC 工具进行预后判断。根据 AJCC 工具,将 GEP 结果分为低风险(1 类)或高风险(2 类)。分别为两个 5 年总生存率截断值(AJCC 为 79%和 68%),分别反映 IIA 期或 IIB 期疾病患者的生存率,用于 AJCC 风险的二分类。

结果

Cox 单因素分析显示,两种工具均能显著对远处无转移生存率和总生存率进行风险分类(危险比范围为 3.2-9.4,P<.001)。共有 43 例(21%)患者的 GEP 和 AJCC 分类不一致(使用 79%的截断值)。在该组中,13 例死亡患者中有 11 例(85%)的 GEP 预测为高风险,但 AJCC 预测为低风险。

局限性

标本反映了三级医疗中心的转诊情况;在入组后,更多有效的治疗方法已被批准用于临床。

结论

当与 AJCC 在线预测工具一起使用时,GEP 可提供有价值的预后信息,并能更好地识别高危黑色素瘤。

相似文献

1
Identification of high-risk cutaneous melanoma tumors is improved when combining the online American Joint Committee on Cancer Individualized Melanoma Patient Outcome Prediction Tool with a 31-gene expression profile-based classification.当将在线美国联合癌症委员会个体化黑色素瘤患者预后预测工具与基于 31 个基因表达谱的分类相结合时,可以提高高危皮肤黑色素瘤肿瘤的识别能力。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 May;76(5):818-825.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.11.051. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
2
Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients.在 523 例皮肤黑素瘤患者的独立队列中评估预后 31 基因表达谱的性能。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3.
3
Identification of patients at risk of metastasis using a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in subpopulations of melanoma patients with favorable outcomes by standard criteria.使用预后 31 基因表达谱在标准标准下具有良好预后的黑色素瘤患者亚群中识别转移风险患者。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):149-157.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.028. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
4
Molecular risk prediction in cutaneous melanoma: A meta-analysis of the 31-gene expression profile prognostic test in 1,479 patients.皮肤黑色素瘤的分子风险预测:对 1479 例患者的 31 个基因表达谱预后检测的荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Sep;83(3):745-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.053. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
5
Long-Term Outcomes in a Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Evaluating the Prognostic 31-Gene Expression Profile for Cutaneous Melanoma.多中心、前瞻性队列评估用于预测皮肤黑色素瘤的 31 个基因表达谱的长期结果。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2021 Apr 6;5. doi: 10.1200/PO.20.00119. eCollection 2021.
6
Performance of Gene Expression Profile Tests for Prognosis in Patients With Localized Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.用于局部皮肤黑色素瘤患者预后的基因表达谱检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Sep 1;156(9):953-962. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1731.
7
Interim analysis of survival in a prospective, multi-center registry cohort of cutaneous melanoma tested with a prognostic 31-gene expression profile test.一项针对皮肤黑色素瘤进行的前瞻性、多中心注册队列研究的生存分析,该队列使用了一种预后 31 基因表达谱检测方法。
J Hematol Oncol. 2017 Aug 29;10(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0520-1.
8
Utility of a 31-gene expression profile for predicting outcomes in patients with primary cutaneous melanoma referred for sentinel node biopsy.用于预测接受前哨淋巴结活检的原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者结局的 31 基因表达谱的效用。
Am J Surg. 2021 Jun;221(6):1195-1199. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.03.028. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Prognostic factors in 1,521 melanoma patients with distant metastases.1521例伴有远处转移的黑色素瘤患者的预后因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Sep;181(3):193-201.
10
Identification of stage I/IIA melanoma patients at high risk for disease relapse using a clinicopathologic and gene expression model.利用临床病理和基因表达模型识别 I/IIA 期黑色素瘤患者中疾病复发的高危人群。
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Nov;140:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of Non-Invasive Imaging Technologies for Cutaneous Melanoma.皮肤黑色素瘤的非侵入性成像技术综述
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 May 7;15(5):297. doi: 10.3390/bios15050297.
2
The Prognostic Value of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.31基因表达谱检测在皮肤黑色素瘤中的预后价值:一项系统评价与Meta分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;16(21):3714. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213714.
3
The Use of Gene Expression Profiling and Biomarkers in Melanoma Diagnosis and Predicting Recurrence: Implications for Surveillance and Treatment.
基因表达谱分析和生物标志物在黑色素瘤诊断及复发预测中的应用:对监测和治疗的意义
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 30;16(3):583. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030583.
4
The 31-Gene Expression Profile Test Outperforms AJCC in Stratifying Risk of Recurrence in Patients with Stage I Cutaneous Melanoma.31基因表达谱检测在I期皮肤黑色素瘤患者复发风险分层方面优于美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)的评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 9;16(2):287. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020287.
5
Clinical Utility of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test on the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma by Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants.31基因表达谱检测在执业护士和医师助理管理皮肤黑色素瘤中的临床应用
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023 Nov;14(7):586-596. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.7.3. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
6
New Technologies in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Melanocytic Lesions.黑素细胞性病变诊断与预后的新技术
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2023 Feb;16(2):44-49.
7
Attitudes of patients with cutaneous melanoma toward prognostic testing using the 31-gene expression profile test.皮肤黑色素瘤患者对使用 31 基因表达谱检测进行预后检测的态度。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):2008-2015. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5047. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Expert Consensus on the Use of Prognostic Gene Expression Profiling Tests for the Management of Cutaneous Melanoma: Consensus from the Skin Cancer Prevention Working Group.皮肤黑色素瘤管理中预后基因表达谱检测应用的专家共识:皮肤癌预防工作组共识
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Apr;12(4):807-823. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00709-x. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9
Follow-up of primary melanoma patients with high risk of recurrence: recommendations based on evidence and consensus.高危复发性原发性黑素瘤患者的随访:基于证据和共识的建议。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Aug;24(8):1515-1523. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02822-x. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
10
Malignant melanoma: evolving practice management in an era of increasingly effective systemic therapies.恶性黑色素瘤:在全身治疗日益有效的时代中不断发展的实践管理
Curr Probl Surg. 2022 Jan;59(1):101030. doi: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101030. Epub 2021 Jul 7.