Ćirić Aleksandar, Aleksić Jelena, Barudžija Tanja, Antić Željka, Đorđević Vesna, Medić Mina, Periša Jovana, Zeković Ivana, Mitrić Miodrag, Dramićanin Miroslav D
Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, 11001 Belgrade, Serbia.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Višegradska 33, 18000 Niš, Serbia.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Mar 28;10(4):627. doi: 10.3390/nano10040627.
The emission of Er provides three combinations of emission bands suitable for ratiometric luminescence thermometry. Two combinations utilize ratios of visible emissions (H→I at 523 nm/ S→I at 542 nm and F→I at 485 nm/ S→I at 545 nm), while emissions from the third combination are located in near-infrared, e.g., in the first biological window (H→I at 793 nm/ S→I at 840 nm). Herein, we aimed to compare thermometric performances of these three different ratiometric readouts on account of their relative sensitivities, resolutions, and repeatability of measurements. For this aim, we prepared Yb,Er:YF nanopowders by oxide fluorination. The structure of the materials was confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis and particle morphology was evaluated from FE-SEM measurements. Upconversion emission spectra were measured over the 293-473 K range upon excitation by 980 nm radiation. The obtained relative sensitivities on temperature for 523/542, 485/542, and 793/840 emission intensity ratios were 1.06 ± 0.02, 2.03 ± 0.23, and 0.98 ± 0.10%K with temperature resolutions of 0.3, 0.7, and 1.8 K, respectively. The study showed that the higher relative temperature sensitivity does not necessarily lead to the more precise temperature measurement and better resolution, since it may be compromised by a larger uncertainty in measurement of low-intensity emission bands.
铒的发射提供了三种适合用于比率发光测温法的发射带组合。其中两种组合利用可见光发射的比率(523 nm处的H→I/542 nm处的S→I以及485 nm处的F→I/545 nm处的S→I),而第三种组合的发射位于近红外区域,例如在第一个生物窗口(793 nm处的H→I/840 nm处的S→I)。在此,我们旨在根据这三种不同比率读数的相对灵敏度、分辨率和测量重复性来比较它们的测温性能。为此目的,我们通过氧化物氟化制备了Yb,Er:YF纳米粉末。通过X射线衍射分析确认了材料的结构,并从场发射扫描电子显微镜测量中评估了颗粒形态。在980 nm辐射激发下,在293 - 473 K范围内测量了上转换发射光谱。对于523/542、485/542和793/840发射强度比率,获得的相对温度灵敏度分别为1.06±0.02、2.03±0.23和0.98±0.10%K,温度分辨率分别为0.3、0.7和1.8 K。该研究表明,较高的相对温度灵敏度不一定会导致更精确的温度测量和更好的分辨率,因为低强度发射带测量中的较大不确定性可能会对其产生影响。