Suppr超能文献

高风险研究中欺骗行为的可允许性

The Permissibility of Deception in Riskier Research.

作者信息

Wendler David

机构信息

Head of the section on research ethics at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center.

出版信息

Ethics Hum Res. 2020 Mar;42(2):34-40. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500046.

Abstract

The use of deception is typically prohibited in studies that pose greater than minimal risk overall. This approach prevents researchers from using deception to conceal significant risks or to deceive participants about the purpose, potential benefits, or other aspects of a study that are relevant to deciding whether to accept such risks. Yet this approach also mistakenly blocks appropriate research. In particular, it keeps researchers from using deception in studies that pose greater than minimal risk, even when participants are informed accurately about the risks and other aspects of the study that are relevant to deciding whether to participate. Rather than prohibiting deception when the overall study poses greater than minimal risk, policies should prohibit deception when the aspect of the study about which participants are deceived poses greater than minimal risk.

摘要

在总体风险大于最小风险的研究中,通常禁止使用欺骗手段。这种做法防止研究人员利用欺骗来隐瞒重大风险,或在研究的目的、潜在益处或与决定是否接受此类风险相关的其他方面欺骗参与者。然而,这种做法也错误地阻碍了适当的研究。特别是,它使研究人员无法在风险大于最小风险的研究中使用欺骗手段,即使参与者已被准确告知与决定是否参与相关的研究风险和其他方面。政策不应在总体研究风险大于最小风险时禁止欺骗,而应在研究中被欺骗的方面风险大于最小风险时禁止欺骗。

相似文献

3
Counterfactual Consent and the Use of Deception in Research.反事实同意与研究中的欺骗使用
Bioethics. 2015 Sep;29(7):470-7. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12142. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
5
The case for deception in medical experimentation.医学实验中的欺骗行为之缘由。
Philos Context. 1984;14:51-9. doi: 10.5840/philcontext1984148.
9
A confederate's perspective on deception.一名同谋者对欺骗行为的看法。
Ethics Behav. 1991;1(4):253-8. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0104_3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验