Wei Jie, Yang Xiao, Wei Can, Zhang Yan-Bin
Department of Ultrasonography, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui 230011, China.
Department of Urology, Hefei Second People's Hospital, Hefei, Anhui 230011, China.
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2019 Sep;25(9):792-796.
To assess the value of transrectal shear wave elastography (SWE) in improving the detection of PCa and differentiating benign from malignant prostatic lesion.
We performed transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and SWE for 83 PCa-suspected patients and measured the maximum (Emax) and mean elastic modulus (Emean) of the lesions. In addition to conventional "6+X" puncture, we conducted SWE-guided prostate puncture and evaluated SWE in improving the detection rate of PCa based on the pathological results. Then, we obtained the threshold value of the Emax using the ROC curve and analyzed its correlation with the clinicopathological data.
SWE-guided puncture was completed in all the 83 patients, of whom 31 were pathologically diagnosed with PCa and the other 52 with BPH. Compared with the BPH patients, the men with PCa showed significantly higher values of Emax ([47.13 ± 9.95] vs [63.70 ± 14.29] kPa, P < 0.05) and Emean ([33.25 ± 4.61] vs [43.04 ± 8.57] kPa, P < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve of Emax was 0.913, with a sensitivity of 90.1% and a specificity of 80.2%, with 54.15 kPa as the diagnostic threshold. The positive rates of PCa detected by SWE-guided puncture and single-needle puncture were 32.53% and 72.38%, respectively, significantly higher than 28.92% and 17.27% by TRUS-guided puncture and single-needle puncture (P < 0.05). Compared with TRUS, SWE exhibited a remarkably higher sensitivity (54.84% vs 80.65%, P < 0.05), specificity (67.31% vs 86.54%, P < 0.05), accuracy (62.65% vs 84.34%, P < 0.05), positive predictive value (50.00% vs 78.13%, P < 0.05) and negative predictive value (71.43% vs 88.26%, P < 0.05) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant prostatic lesions. Emax was positively correlated with the Gleason scores of the PCa patients.
SWE can help determine the biopsy target, improve the detection of PCa and differentiate PCa from BPH.
评估经直肠剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在提高前列腺癌(PCa)检测率及鉴别前列腺良恶性病变方面的价值。
对83例疑似PCa患者进行经直肠超声检查(TRUS)和SWE检查,测量病变的最大弹性模量(Emax)和平均弹性模量(Emean)。除常规“6+X”穿刺外,还进行SWE引导下前列腺穿刺,并根据病理结果评估SWE在提高PCa检测率方面的作用。然后,利用ROC曲线获得Emax的阈值,并分析其与临床病理数据的相关性。
83例患者均完成SWE引导下穿刺,其中31例病理诊断为PCa,52例为良性前列腺增生(BPH)。与BPH患者相比,PCa患者的Emax值([47.13±9.95]vs[63.70±14.29]kPa,P<0.05)和Emean值([33.25±4.61]vs[43.04±8.57]kPa,P<0.05)显著更高。Emax的ROC曲线下面积为0.913,灵敏度为90.1%,特异度为80.2%,诊断阈值为54.15 kPa。SWE引导下穿刺和单针穿刺检测PCa的阳性率分别为32.53%和72.38%,显著高于TRUS引导下穿刺和单针穿刺的28.92%和17.27%(P<0.05)。与TRUS相比,SWE在前列腺良恶性病变鉴别诊断中的灵敏度(54.84% vs 80.65%,P<0.05)、特异度(67.31% vs 86.54%,P<0.05)、准确度(62.65% vs 84.34%,P<0.05)、阳性预测值(50.00% vs 78.13%,P<0.05)和阴性预测值(71.43% vs 88.26%,P<0.05)均显著更高。Emax与PCa患者的Gleason评分呈正相关。
SWE有助于确定活检靶点,提高PCa的检测率,并鉴别PCa与BPH。