Municipality of Lyngby-Taarbæk, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Qual Health Res. 2020 Jun;30(7):1045-1057. doi: 10.1177/1049732320909098. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that routine immunization coverage has declined in Europe. In this article, we present the findings of a Norman Fairclough-inspired critical discourse analysis undertaken to explore how the Danish media came to suggest a possible linkage between the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine and serious side effects. The findings of the analysis highlight the social consequences of the controversy over the HPV vaccine, identified within the framework of three perspectives: (1) overall criticism of vaccine efficacy and safety, rooted in an ideological opposition; (2) a growing societal tendency to question the authority of the official health bodies; and (3) the specific controversy over the HPV vaccine. We suggest that the controversy over the HPV vaccine is rooted in an ideological conflict, and the declining acceptance implies that the perception that the vaccine causes serious side effects has gained currency among the general public.
世界卫生组织（WHO）报告称，欧洲的常规免疫接种率有所下降。在本文中，我们介绍了一项受诺曼·费尔克拉夫启发的批评性话语分析的结果，该分析旨在探讨丹麦媒体如何暗示人乳头瘤病毒（HPV）疫苗与严重副作用之间可能存在联系。分析结果突出了 HPV 疫苗争议所带来的社会后果，该争议是在三个视角下确定的：（1）对疫苗功效和安全性的总体批评，源于意识形态上的对立；（2）社会上越来越倾向于质疑官方卫生机构的权威；（3）HPV 疫苗的具体争议。我们认为，HPV 疫苗的争议源于意识形态冲突，而接受率的下降意味着疫苗会引起严重副作用的看法在公众中已经得到认可。
