Lau K L, Bradish T, Rannan-Eliya S
Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020 Sep;102(7):483-487. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2020.0050. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
Management of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma is with initial excision biopsy followed by a wide local excision to achieve locoregional control. For low-risk thin melanomas, the added survival benefit from the wide local excision is minimal. In this study, we investigated the morbidities of wide local excision and evaluated the current clinical practice in managing stage IA malignant melanoma.
Patients with confirmed stage IA malignant melanoma who had undergone a wide local excision in the 2013/14 period were identified using a specialist cancer multidisciplinary team-held database. Primary pathology, surgical data and follow-up documentation were analysed.
A total of 231 cases were identified; 95% of patients ( = 220) had malignant melanoma excised completely at first excision biopsy, mean margin 2.8mm (range 0.5-8.0mm). Postoperative morbidities occurred in 25% of patients ( = 57), including 6.6% wound problems, 10.9% scarring problems, 10.0% psychological stress and 0.4% cosmetic concern. Wide local excision reconstructions were performed with primary closure in 82% of patients, split skin grafts in 4%, full-thickness skin grafts in 3% and flaps in 10%. Of the total, 44% of patients ( = 101) had further excisions and 17 received new low-risk melanoma diagnoses.
We demonstrated that 1cm wide local excision is associated with significant morbidity, which can affect patients' physical, psychological and social wellbeing. Since wide local excision does not give a survival advantage, and its margin is already frequently reduced in cosmetically sensitive areas, the need for a second full 1cm wide local excision procedure for thin melanoma should be re-evaluated, especially when 95% of our study cohort had their malignant melanoma completely excised by the initial biopsy alone.
原发性皮肤恶性黑色素瘤的治疗方法是先进行切除活检,随后进行广泛局部切除以实现局部区域控制。对于低风险的薄型黑色素瘤,广泛局部切除带来的额外生存获益微乎其微。在本研究中,我们调查了广泛局部切除的发病率,并评估了目前IA期恶性黑色素瘤的临床管理实践。
利用一个由癌症多学科专家团队维护的数据库,识别出在2013/14期间接受了广泛局部切除的确诊IA期恶性黑色素瘤患者。分析了原发病理、手术数据和随访记录。
共识别出231例病例;95%的患者(n = 220)在首次切除活检时黑色素瘤被完全切除,平均切缘2.8mm(范围0.5 - 8.0mm)。25%的患者(n = 57)出现术后并发症,包括6.6%的伤口问题、10.9%的瘢痕问题、10.0%的心理压力和0.4%的美容问题。82%的患者采用一期缝合进行广泛局部切除重建,4%采用中厚皮片移植,3%采用全厚皮片移植,10%采用皮瓣移植。总体而言,44%的患者(n = 101)接受了进一步切除,17例被诊断为新的低风险黑色素瘤。
我们证明1cm的广泛局部切除会带来显著的发病率,这会影响患者的身体、心理和社会福祉。由于广泛局部切除并不能带来生存优势,而且在对美容敏感的区域其切缘已经经常缩小,对于薄型黑色素瘤,二次进行完整的1cm广泛局部切除手术的必要性应重新评估,特别是当我们研究队列中的95%患者仅通过初次活检就将恶性黑色素瘤完全切除时。