Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
California Institute of Integral Studies, San Francisco, California, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2020 Oct;23(10):1323-1334. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0603. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
Recent and preprohibition studies show that patients with serious illness might benefit from psychedelic-assisted therapies for a range of symptoms, physical, psychosocial, and existential. To explore the potential roles and research priorities of these therapies in patients with serious illness. Qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with 17 experts in serious illness care and/or psychedelic research from the United States and Canada. The interview guide elicited participants' perspectives on (1) the potential roles of psychedelic-assisted therapies in this setting, (2) research priorities relevant to this population, and (3) the potential for integrating psychedelic-assisted therapies into existing delivery models of serious illness care. We used thematic analysis until thematic saturation. Domain I: Participants had polar views on the therapeutic potential of psychedelic-assisted therapies, ranging from strong beliefs in their medical utility to reluctance about their use in this patient population. They shared concerns related to the risks of adverse effects, such as delirium or worsening of psychological distress. Domain II: Research priorities primarily concerned patients with clinically diagnosed psychosocial distress, such as depression, anxiety, or demoralization. Participants also articulated potential roles extending beyond traditional medical diagnosis. Domain III: Participants emphasized essential safety and efficacy guidelines relevant to the integration of these therapies into existing models of care. This qualitative study highlights issues and priorities for research on psychedelic-assisted therapies in patients with serious illness and proposes a conceptual framework for integrating these therapies into existing delivery models of serious illness care.
近期和禁令前的研究表明,患有严重疾病的患者可能会从迷幻辅助疗法中受益,这些疗法可以治疗一系列症状,包括身体、心理社会和存在方面的症状。为了探索这些疗法在患有严重疾病的患者中的潜在作用和研究重点。这是一项基于对来自美国和加拿大的 17 名严重疾病护理和/或迷幻研究专家的半结构化访谈的定性研究。访谈指南引出了参与者对以下方面的看法:(1)迷幻辅助疗法在这种情况下的潜在作用,(2)与该人群相关的研究重点,以及(3)将迷幻辅助疗法融入严重疾病护理现有提供模式的潜力。我们使用主题分析直到达到主题饱和。领域 I:参与者对迷幻辅助疗法的治疗潜力持两极分化的观点,从强烈相信其医学效用到对在该患者群体中使用的不情愿。他们共同关注与不良反应风险相关的问题,如谵妄或心理困扰的恶化。领域 II:研究重点主要涉及有临床诊断的心理社会困扰的患者,如抑郁、焦虑或沮丧。参与者还表达了可能超越传统医学诊断的作用。领域 III:参与者强调了与将这些疗法融入现有护理模式相关的基本安全性和有效性指南。这项定性研究强调了在患有严重疾病的患者中开展迷幻辅助疗法研究的问题和重点,并提出了将这些疗法融入现有严重疾病护理提供模式的概念框架。