The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Oxford Vaccine Group, University of Oxford, CCVTM, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 31;10(1):5716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61730-8.
Adenoviral vectors are being developed as vaccines against infectious agents and tumour-associated antigens, because of their ability to induce cellular immunity. However, the protection afforded in animal models has not easily translated into primates and clinical trials, underlying the need for improving adenoviral vaccines-induced immunogenicity. A Toll-like receptor signalling molecule, TRAM, was assessed for its ability to modify the immune responses induced by an adenovirus-based vaccine. Different adenovirus vectors either expressing TRAM alone or co-expressing TRAM along with a model antigen were constructed. The modification of T-cell and antibody responses induced by TRAM was assessed in vivo in mice and in primates. Co-expression of TRAM and an antigen from adenoviruses increased the transgene-specific CD8+ T cell responses in mice. Similar effects were seen when a TRAM expressing virus was co-administered with the antigen-expressing adenovirus. However, in primate studies, co-administration of a TRAM expressing adenovirus with a vaccine expressing the ME-TRAP malaria antigen had no significant effect on the immune responses. While these results support the idea that modification of innate immune signalling by genetic vectors modifies immunogenicity, they also emphasise the difficulty in generalising results from rodents into primates, where the regulatory pathway may be different to that in mice.
腺病毒载体因其能够诱导细胞免疫而被开发为针对传染病原体和肿瘤相关抗原的疫苗。然而,动物模型中提供的保护作用不容易转化为灵长类动物和临床试验,这就需要提高腺病毒疫苗的免疫原性。一种 Toll 样受体信号分子 TRAM 被评估其修饰基于腺病毒的疫苗诱导的免疫应答的能力。构建了单独表达 TRAM 或与模型抗原共表达 TRAM 的不同腺病毒载体。在小鼠和灵长类动物体内评估了 TRAM 诱导的 T 细胞和抗体应答的修饰。TRAM 和腺病毒抗原的共表达增加了小鼠中转基因特异性 CD8+ T 细胞应答。当表达 TRAM 的病毒与表达抗原的腺病毒共同给药时,也观察到类似的效果。然而,在灵长类动物研究中,表达 TRAM 的腺病毒与表达 ME-TRAP 疟疾抗原的疫苗共同给药对免疫应答没有显著影响。虽然这些结果支持通过遗传载体修饰固有免疫信号来改变免疫原性的观点,但它们也强调了将啮齿动物的结果推广到灵长类动物的困难,其中调节途径可能与小鼠不同。