Urology Unit, San Carlo Di Nancy Hospital, GVM Care and Research, Via Aurelia 275, 00100, Rome, Italy.
Department of Surgical Sciences, University Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):121-128. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03170-7. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
To explore the role of vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy versus conventional dressings in the Fournier's gangrene wound therapy.
This is a retrospective multi-institutional cohort study. Data of 92 patients from nine centers between 2007 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. After surgery, patient having a local or a disseminated FG were managed with VAC therapy or with conventional dressings. The 10-weeks wound closure cumulative rate and OS were analyzed.
Of the 92 patients, 62 (67.4%) showed local and 30 (32.6%) a disseminated FG. After surgery, 19 patients (20.7%) with local and 14 (15.2%) with disseminated FG underwent to VAC therapy; 43 (46.7%) with local and 16 (17.4%) with disseminated FG were treated using conventional dressings. The multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the VAC in patients with disseminated FG led to a higher cumulative rate of wound closure than patients treated with no-VAC (OR = 6.5; 95% CI 1.1-37.4, p = 0.036). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the OS showed a significant difference between no-VAC patients with local and disseminated FG (OS rate at 90 days 0.90, 95% CI 0.71-0.97 vs 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-0.78, respectively; p = 0.039). Cox regression confirmed that no-VAC patients with disseminated FG showed the lowest OS (hazard ratio adjusted for sex and age HR = 3.4, 95% CI 1.1-10.4; p = 0.033).
In this large cohort study, VAC therapy in patients with disseminated FG may offer an advantage in terms of 10-weeks wound closure cumulative rate and OS at 90 days after initial surgery.
探讨真空辅助闭合(VAC)治疗与传统敷料在 Fournier 坏疽创面治疗中的作用。
这是一项回顾性多中心队列研究。分析了 2007 年至 2018 年来自 9 个中心的 92 名患者的数据。手术后,局部或播散性 FG 的患者接受 VAC 治疗或传统敷料治疗。分析 10 周创面闭合累积率和 OS。
92 例患者中,62 例(67.4%)为局部 FG,30 例(32.6%)为播散性 FG。手术后,19 例(20.7%)局部 FG 和 14 例(15.2%)播散性 FG 行 VAC 治疗;43 例(46.7%)局部 FG 和 16 例(17.4%)播散性 FG 行传统敷料治疗。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,播散性 FG 患者使用 VAC 治疗比未使用 VAC 治疗的患者创面闭合累积率更高(OR=6.5;95%CI 1.1-37.4,p=0.036)。OS 的 Kaplan-Meier 生存曲线显示,局部和播散性 FG 患者的无 VAC 治疗之间存在显著差异(90 天 OS 率分别为 0.90(95%CI 0.71-0.97)和 0.55(95%CI 0.24-0.78),p=0.039)。Cox 回归证实,播散性 FG 无 VAC 治疗患者的 OS 最低(调整性别和年龄后的 HR=3.4,95%CI 1.1-10.4;p=0.033)。
在这项大型队列研究中,VAC 治疗播散性 FG 患者在 10 周创面闭合累积率和初始手术后 90 天 OS 方面可能具有优势。