Texas Tech University.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2020 Oct;46(4):701-718. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12427. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
Introduced by Sprenkle, Blow & Dickey (1999), common factors in marriage and family therapy (MFT) have been discussed over the past two decades. Although the MFT common factors literature has grown, there are misconceptions and disagreements about their role in theory, practice, research, and training. This content analysis examined the contributions of the common factors paradigm to MFT theory, practice, research, and training over the past 20 years. We identified 37 scholarly works including peer-reviewed journal articles, books, and chapters. Using mixed methods content analysis, we analyze and synthesize the contributions of this literature in terms of theoretical development about therapeutic effectiveness in MFT, MFT training, research, and practice. We provide commentary on the substantive contributions that the common factors paradigm has made to these areas, and we discuss the implications and limitations of the common factors literature, and provide recommendations for moving common factors research forward.
斯普伦克尔、布洛威和迪基(1999 年)引入了婚姻和家庭治疗(MFT)中的共同因素,在过去的二十年中,人们一直在讨论这些共同因素。尽管 MFT 共同因素文献不断增加,但人们对它们在理论、实践、研究和培训中的作用仍存在误解和分歧。本内容分析考察了过去 20 年来共同因素范式对 MFT 理论、实践、研究和培训的贡献。我们确定了 37 篇学术著作,包括同行评议的期刊文章、书籍和章节。使用混合方法内容分析,我们从 MFT 治疗效果的理论发展、MFT 培训、研究和实践等方面,对这些文献的贡献进行了分析和综合。我们对共同因素范式在这些领域的实质性贡献进行了评论,并讨论了共同因素文献的意义和局限性,为推进共同因素研究提供了建议。