Suppr超能文献

内科住院患者的预立医疗指示讨论:一项对患者和医生的调查结果。

Code status discussions in medical inpatients: results of a survey of patients and physicians.

机构信息

Medical Communication and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland / Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

Medical Communication and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Mar 23;150:w20194. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20194.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Code status discussions are useful for understanding patients’ preferences in the case of a cardiac/pulmonary arrest. These discussions can also provide patients with a basis for informed decision-making regarding life-sustaining treatment. We conducted a survey to understand current practices and perceptions of code status discussions in a tertiary-care Swiss hospital.

METHODS

We performed systematic interviews across different departments of the University Hospital of Basel. We interviewed 258 physicians and 145 patients who were hospitalised between May and July 2018 using a questionnaire designed to assess the use of code status discussions and to gauge patients’ individual experiences and opinions.

RESULTS

A total of 61.4% of patients did not recall having had a code status discussion during the hospital stay. However, a higher proportion of medical patients compared to surgical patients recalled having had a discussion (43.6 vs 22.4%, p = 0.03). For 9 out of 38 (23.7%) patients who did recall the discussion, there was a lack of agreement between the preference given in the interview regarding resuscitation measures and the documented code status in the medical electronic chart. Furthermore, a majority of physicians (72.4%) recalled defining a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) status for a patient without prior discussion with the patient. Physicians who recalled determining the DNR status without patient consultation reported conflicts with patients and relatives regarding code status at a higher rate compared to physicians who did not define DNR status without consultation (62.4 vs 39.4%, p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients do not report having discussed code status during their hospital stay and physicians frequently omit such discussions, thereby potentially failing to attend to patients’ preferences for care. Physician training regarding code status discussions may improve the quality of informed decision-making and patient-centred care.

摘要

简介

讨论患者的医疗决策意愿(即代码状态)对于处理心搏骤停/心肺复苏的情况非常有用。此类讨论也为患者提供了一个基础,让他们能够就生命支持治疗做出明智的决策。我们进行了一项调查,以了解瑞士一家三级保健医院中代码状态讨论的当前实践和看法。

方法

我们在巴塞尔大学医院的不同科室进行了系统的访谈。我们于 2018 年 5 月至 7 月期间,使用设计来评估代码状态讨论的使用情况并评估患者个人经历和意见的问卷,对 258 名医生和 145 名住院患者进行了访谈。

结果

共有 61.4%的患者表示在住院期间没有回忆起进行过代码状态讨论。然而,与外科患者相比,更多的内科患者回忆起了讨论(43.6% vs 22.4%,p = 0.03)。在 38 名(23.7%)回忆起讨论的患者中,有 9 名患者在访谈中表达的复苏措施偏好与医疗电子病历中记录的代码状态之间存在差异。此外,大多数医生(72.4%)回忆说,在没有与患者事先讨论的情况下,为患者确定了不复苏(DNR)状态。与没有与患者进行咨询就确定 DNR 状态的医生相比,回忆起没有咨询就确定 DNR 状态的医生报告与患者和家属在代码状态上存在冲突的比例更高(62.4% vs 39.4%,p <0.001)。

结论

大多数患者表示在住院期间没有讨论过代码状态,而医生经常省略此类讨论,从而可能没有关注到患者对护理的偏好。对代码状态讨论进行医生培训可能会提高知情决策和以患者为中心的护理质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验