Suppr超能文献

一项关于对饮食障碍心理病理学的电子治疗干预的态度和偏好的调查研究。

A survey study of attitudes toward, and preferences for, e-therapy interventions for eating disorder psychopathology.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

School of Science, Engineering and Information Technology, Federation University, Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Jun;53(6):907-916. doi: 10.1002/eat.23268. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

E-therapy shows promise as a solution to the barriers that stand in the way of people receiving eating disorder (ED) treatment. Despite the potential for e-therapy to reduce the well-known treatment gap, little is known about public views and perspectives on this mode of intervention delivery. This study explored attitudes toward, and preferences for, e-therapy among individuals spanning the spectrum of eating pathology.

METHOD

Survey data assessing e-therapy attitudes and preferences were analyzed from 713 participants recruited from the public. Participants were categorized into one of five subgroups based on the type of self-reported ED symptoms and severity/risk level, ranging from high risk to a probable threshold or subthreshold ED.

RESULTS

Attitudes toward e-therapies appeared to be relatively positive; participants largely supported health care insurance coverage of costs for e-therapies, and were optimistic about the wide-ranging benefits of e-therapy. Although three-quarters of participants expressed a preference for face-to-face therapy, a significant percentage of participants (∼50%) reported an intention to use an e-therapy program for current or future eating problems, with intention ratings highest (70%) among those with probable bulimia nervosa (BN). Variables associated with an e-therapy preference were not currently receiving psychotherapy, more positive e-therapy attitudes, and greater stigma associated with professional help-seeking. Variables associated with e-therapy intentions were more positive e-therapy attitudes and a probable BN classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Present findings have important implications for increasing online intervention acceptance, engagement, and help-seeking among those at different stages of illness.

摘要

目的

电子治疗作为一种解决人们接受饮食失调(ED)治疗障碍的方法,显示出了很大的潜力。尽管电子治疗有可能减少众所周知的治疗差距,但人们对这种干预方式的公众意见和看法知之甚少。本研究探讨了不同饮食障碍谱系人群对电子治疗的态度和偏好。

方法

从公众中招募的 713 名参与者的调查数据评估了对电子治疗的态度和偏好。根据自我报告的 ED 症状的类型和严重程度/风险水平,将参与者分为五类亚组,范围从高风险到可能的阈或亚阈 ED。

结果

对电子治疗的态度似乎相对积极;参与者普遍支持健康保险支付电子治疗的费用,并对电子治疗的广泛益处持乐观态度。尽管四分之三的参与者表示更喜欢面对面的治疗,但仍有相当一部分参与者(约 50%)表示打算使用电子治疗计划来解决当前或未来的饮食问题,在可能患有贪食症的人群中,这一比例最高(70%)。与电子治疗偏好相关的变量是目前未接受心理治疗、对电子治疗态度更积极、以及与专业寻求帮助相关的耻辱感更大。与电子治疗意向相关的变量是对电子治疗的态度更积极和可能患有贪食症。

结论

目前的研究结果对提高不同疾病阶段人群对在线干预的接受度、参与度和寻求帮助具有重要意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验