• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于网络的解释偏差修正以减少焦虑思维的早期损耗预测:一项机器学习研究

Early Attrition Prediction for Web-Based Interpretation Bias Modification to Reduce Anxious Thinking: A Machine Learning Study.

作者信息

Baee Sonia, Eberle Jeremy W, Baglione Anna N, Spears Tyler, Lewis Elijah, Wang Hongning, Funk Daniel H, Teachman Bethany, E Barnes Laura

机构信息

Department of Systems and Information Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Dec 20;11:e51567. doi: 10.2196/51567.

DOI:10.2196/51567
PMID:39705068
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11699492/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital mental health is a promising paradigm for individualized, patient-driven health care. For example, cognitive bias modification programs that target interpretation biases (cognitive bias modification for interpretation [CBM-I]) can provide practice thinking about ambiguous situations in less threatening ways on the web without requiring a therapist. However, digital mental health interventions, including CBM-I, are often plagued with lack of sustained engagement and high attrition rates. New attrition detection and mitigation strategies are needed to improve these interventions.

OBJECTIVE

This paper aims to identify participants at a high risk of dropout during the early stages of 3 web-based trials of multisession CBM-I and to investigate which self-reported and passively detected feature sets computed from the participants interacting with the intervention and assessments were most informative in making this prediction.

METHODS

The participants analyzed in this paper were community adults with traits such as anxiety or negative thinking about the future (Study 1: n=252, Study 2: n=326, Study 3: n=699) who had been assigned to CBM-I conditions in 3 efficacy-effectiveness trials on our team's public research website. To identify participants at a high risk of dropout, we created 4 unique feature sets: self-reported baseline user characteristics (eg, demographics), self-reported user context and reactions to the program (eg, state affect), self-reported user clinical functioning (eg, mental health symptoms), and passively detected user behavior on the website (eg, time spent on a web page of CBM-I training exercises, time of day during which the exercises were completed, latency of completing the assessments, and type of device used). Then, we investigated the feature sets as potential predictors of which participants were at high risk of not starting the second training session of a given program using well-known machine learning algorithms.

RESULTS

The extreme gradient boosting algorithm performed the best and identified participants at high risk with macro-F-scores of .832 (Study 1 with 146 features), .770 (Study 2 with 87 features), and .917 (Study 3 with 127 features). Features involving passive detection of user behavior contributed the most to the prediction relative to other features. The mean Gini importance scores for the passive features were as follows: .033 (95% CI .019-.047) in Study 1; .029 (95% CI .023-.035) in Study 2; and .045 (95% CI .039-.051) in Study 3. However, using all features extracted from a given study led to the best predictive performance.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that using passive indicators of user behavior, alongside self-reported measures, can improve the accuracy of prediction of participants at a high risk of dropout early during multisession CBM-I programs. Furthermore, our analyses highlight the challenge of generalizability in digital health intervention studies and the need for more personalized attrition prevention strategies.

摘要

背景

数字心理健康是一种有前景的个性化、患者驱动型医疗保健模式。例如,针对解释偏差的认知偏差修正程序(解释性认知偏差修正 [CBM-I])可以让患者在网络上以威胁性较小的方式练习思考模糊情境,而无需治疗师在场。然而,包括CBM-I在内的数字心理健康干预措施常常存在缺乏持续参与度和高流失率的问题。因此需要新的流失检测和缓解策略来改进这些干预措施。

目的

本文旨在识别在三项多节次CBM-I网络试验早期阶段有高辍学风险的参与者,并研究从参与者与干预措施及评估的交互中计算得出的哪些自我报告和被动检测到的特征集在进行此预测时最具信息价值。

方法

本文分析的参与者是具有焦虑或对未来消极思考等特征的社区成年人(研究1:n = 252,研究2:n = 326,研究3:n = 699),他们在我们团队的公共研究网站上的三项疗效-效果试验中被分配到CBM-I条件组。为了识别有高辍学风险的参与者,我们创建了4个独特的特征集:自我报告的基线用户特征(如人口统计学特征)、自我报告的用户情境及对程序的反应(如状态情感)、自我报告的用户临床功能(如心理健康症状)以及在网站上被动检测到的用户行为(如在CBM-I训练练习网页上花费的时间、完成练习的时间段、完成评估的延迟时间以及使用的设备类型)。然后,我们使用著名的机器学习算法研究这些特征集作为哪些参与者有不开始给定程序第二次训练课程的高风险的潜在预测指标。

结果

极端梯度提升算法表现最佳,识别出高风险参与者的宏F分数分别为.832(研究1,有146个特征)、.770(研究2,有87个特征)和.917(研究3,有127个特征)。相对于其他特征,涉及被动检测用户行为的特征对预测的贡献最大。被动特征的平均基尼重要性分数如下:研究1中为.033(95%置信区间.019 -.047);研究2中为.029(95%置信区间.023 -.035);研究1中为.045(95%置信区间.039 -.051)。然而,使用从给定研究中提取的所有特征可获得最佳预测性能。

结论

这些结果表明,在多节次CBM-I程序早期,将用户行为的被动指标与自我报告测量相结合,可以提高对有高辍学风险参与者预测的准确性。此外,我们的分析突出了数字健康干预研究中普遍性的挑战以及对更个性化流失预防策略的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/e12d801ace7c/mental_v11i1e51567_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/3b5bd0866f7b/mental_v11i1e51567_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/5639876309c5/mental_v11i1e51567_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/e12d801ace7c/mental_v11i1e51567_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/3b5bd0866f7b/mental_v11i1e51567_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/5639876309c5/mental_v11i1e51567_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b59/11699492/e12d801ace7c/mental_v11i1e51567_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Early Attrition Prediction for Web-Based Interpretation Bias Modification to Reduce Anxious Thinking: A Machine Learning Study.基于网络的解释偏差修正以减少焦虑思维的早期损耗预测:一项机器学习研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Dec 20;11:e51567. doi: 10.2196/51567.
2
Web-based interpretation bias training to reduce anxiety: A sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial.基于网络的解释偏差训练以减轻焦虑:一项序贯多分配随机试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Jun;92(6):367-384. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000896.
3
Developing a Process for the Analysis of User Journeys and the Prediction of Dropout in Digital Health Interventions: Machine Learning Approach.开发一种用于分析用户旅程和预测数字健康干预措施中辍学的方法:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e17738. doi: 10.2196/17738.
4
Cognitive bias modification for interpretation with and without prior repetitive negative thinking to reduce worry and rumination in generalised anxiety disorder and depression: protocol for a multisession experimental study with an active control condition.针对伴有和不伴有既往反复消极思维的解释进行认知偏差修正,以减少广泛性焦虑症和抑郁症中的担忧和沉思:一项带有积极对照条件的多阶段实验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 16;6(12):e013404. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013404.
5
Cognitive bias modification as a web-based intervention for problem drinkers: A randomized controlled trial with a factorial design.认知偏差矫正作为一种针对问题饮酒者的基于网络的干预措施:一项析因设计的随机对照试验。
Behav Res Ther. 2025 May;188:104718. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2025.104718. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
6
Changes in Learning From Social Feedback After Web-Based Interpretation Bias Modification: Secondary Analysis of a Digital Mental Health Intervention Among Individuals With High Social Anxiety Symptoms.基于网络的解释偏差修正后从社会反馈中学习的变化:对有高度社交焦虑症状个体的数字心理健康干预的二次分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 9;7:e44888. doi: 10.2196/44888.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Feasibility and effectiveness of a web-based positive psychology program for youth mental health: randomized controlled trial.基于网络的青少年心理健康积极心理学项目的可行性与有效性:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 4;16(6):e140. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3176.
9
Impact of an Online Discussion Forum on Self-Guided Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Public Safety Personnel: Randomized Trial.在线讨论论坛对公共安全人员自我导向的互联网认知行为疗法的影响:随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e59699. doi: 10.2196/59699.
10
Effects of standard and explicit cognitive bias modification and computer-administered cognitive-behaviour therapy on cognitive biases and social anxiety.标准和明确的认知偏差修正以及计算机辅助认知行为疗法对认知偏差和社交焦虑的影响。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;45(2):272-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.12.002. Epub 2013 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioral engagement patterns and psychosocial outcomes in web-based interpretation bias training for anxiety.基于网络的焦虑症解释偏差训练中的行为参与模式和心理社会结果
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 24;4(7):e0000945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000945. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Web-based interpretation bias training to reduce anxiety: A sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial.基于网络的解释偏差训练以减轻焦虑:一项序贯多分配随机试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Jun;92(6):367-384. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000896.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-based interpretation bias training to reduce anxiety: A sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial.基于网络的解释偏差训练以减轻焦虑:一项序贯多分配随机试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2024 Jun;92(6):367-384. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000896.
2
Shifting Episodic Prediction With Online Cognitive Bias Modification: A Randomized Controlled Trial.通过在线认知偏差修正进行的间歇性预测转移:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;11(5):819-840. doi: 10.1177/21677026221103128. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
3
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression: Scoping Review of User Engagement.
数字心理健康干预在抑郁症中的应用:用户参与度的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 14;24(10):e39204. doi: 10.2196/39204.
4
Lessons Learned: Providing Supportive Accountability in an Online Anxiety Intervention.经验教训:在在线焦虑干预中提供支持性问责制。
Behav Ther. 2022 May;53(3):492-507. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.12.002. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
Engagement in digital interventions.参与数字干预措施。
Am Psychol. 2022 Oct;77(7):836-852. doi: 10.1037/amp0000983. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
6
Investigating When, Which, and Why Users Stop Using a Digital Health Intervention to Promote an Active Lifestyle: Secondary Analysis With A Focus on Health Action Process Approach-Based Psychological Determinants.调查用户何时、为何以及为何停止使用数字健康干预措施来促进积极的生活方式:基于健康行动过程方法的心理决定因素的重点的二次分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 31;10(1):e30583. doi: 10.2196/30583.
7
Exploring the relationship between the usability of a goal-oriented mobile health application and non-usage attrition in patients with multimorbidity: A blended data analysis approach.探索面向目标的移动健康应用程序的可用性与患有多种疾病的患者的未使用损耗之间的关系:一种混合数据分析方法。
Digit Health. 2021 Oct 5;7:20552076211045579. doi: 10.1177/20552076211045579. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Marketplace and Literature Review of Spanish Language Mental Health Apps.西班牙语心理健康应用程序的市场与文献综述
Front Digit Health. 2021 Feb 15;3:615366. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.615366. eCollection 2021.
9
Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.2020 年 COVID-19 大流行期间 204 个国家和地区的抑郁和焦虑障碍的全球患病率和负担。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
Adapting cognitive bias modification to train healthy prospection.适应认知偏差修正来训练健康的前瞻性。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Sep;144:103923. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103923. Epub 2021 Jun 30.