Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2020 May;47(3):381-384. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
To evaluate the clinical and physiologic effects of intramuscular (IM) administration of medetomidine with and without tramadol in dogs.
Prospective experimental study.
A group of eight mixed breed dogs of both sexes, aged 1-2 years, weighing 16.0 ± 0.6 kg.
Each dog was studied twice at ≥1 week interval. Medetomidine (5 μg kg; treatment M) was administered IM alone or with tramadol (4 mg kg; treatment MT). Sedation was scored by a system that included vocalization, posture, appearance, interactive behaviors, resistance to restraint and response to noise. Times from drug administration to ataxia, impaired walking, head drop, sternal and lateral position and standing were recorded. Sedation score, heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, end-tidal carbon dioxide (Pe'CO), hemoglobin oxygen saturation and mean noninvasive blood pressure were recorded and compared 15 minutes before and 15, 30 and 45 minutes after drug administration.
Dogs administered MT had higher sedation scores than dogs administered M at 30 and 45 minutes after drug administration (p < 0.05). Times to ataxia, impaired walking, head drop and sternal recumbency were not different between the treatments. Time to lateral recumbency was longer in M than in MT (21.1 ± 1.0 versus 17.6 ± 0.7 minutes, respectively; p < 0.05). Time to standing was longer in MT than in M (67.9 ± 1.4 versus 54.5 ± 1.9 minutes, respectively; p < 0.001). Measured physiological variables did not differ between the treatments, with the exception of Pe'CO, which was higher in MT than in M at all post-treatment evaluation times (p < 0.001).
Tramadol combined with medetomidine resulted in greater sedation scores (deeper sedation) than medetomidine alone in dogs, and minimal adverse changes in the physiologic variables were measured.
评估肌肉内(IM)给予甲磺酸右美托咪定(medetomidine)联合或不联合曲马多对犬的临床和生理影响。
前瞻性实验研究。
8 只混合品种犬,公母各半,年龄 1-2 岁,体重 16.0±0.6kg。
每只犬在间隔至少 1 周的时间内进行 2 次研究。单独给予 IM 甲磺酸右美托咪定(5μg/kg;治疗 M)或联合给予 IM 曲马多(4mg/kg;治疗 MT)。采用包括发声、姿势、外观、互动行为、对约束的抵抗力和对噪音的反应的系统对镇静进行评分。记录从药物给药到共济失调、行走困难、头下垂、胸骨和侧卧位以及站立的时间。记录镇静评分、心率、呼吸频率、直肠温度、呼气末二氧化碳(Pe'CO)、血红蛋白氧饱和度和平均无创血压,并在给药前 15 分钟以及给药后 15、30 和 45 分钟进行比较。
与给予 M 的犬相比,给予 MT 的犬在给药后 30 和 45 分钟时的镇静评分更高(p<0.05)。两种治疗方法在共济失调、行走困难、头下垂和胸骨卧位时间方面无差异。M 组侧卧时间长于 MT 组(21.1±1.0 与 17.6±0.7 分钟,分别;p<0.05)。MT 组站立时间长于 M 组(67.9±1.4 与 54.5±1.9 分钟,分别;p<0.001)。两种治疗方法的生理变量无差异,除呼气末二氧化碳(Pe'CO)外,MT 组在所有治疗后评估时间均高于 M 组(p<0.001)。
与单独给予甲磺酸右美托咪定相比,曲马多联合甲磺酸右美托咪定在犬中产生更大的镇静评分(更深的镇静),并测量到最小的生理变量变化。