• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位可能不是人工关节置换术后感染的危险因素。

Socioeconomic Status May Not Be a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1900-1905. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.058. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.058
PMID:32241649
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication after total joint arthroplasty, carrying significant economic and personal burden. The goal of this study is to use an established database to analyze socioeconomic variables and assess their relationship to PJI. Additionally, we sought to evaluate whether socioeconomic factors, along with other known risk factors of PJI, when controlled for in a statistical model affected the familial risk of PJI.

METHODS

With approval from our Institutional Review Board we performed a population-based retrospective cohort study on all primary total joint arthroplasty cases of the hip or knee (n = 85,332), within a statewide database, between January 1996 and December 2013. We excluded 9854 patients due to age <18 years, missing data, history of PJI prior to index procedure, and no evidence of 2-year follow-up (excluding those with PJI). Cases that developed PJI following the index procedure (n = 2282) were compared to those that did not (n = 73,196).

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates, patients with Medicaid as a primary payer were at greater risk for experiencing PJI (relative risk 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.82, P = .01). There was no difference in risk between the groups associated with education level or median household income (all, P > .05). First-degree relatives of patients who develop PJI (hazard ratio 1.66, 95% CI 1.23-2.24, P = .001) and first-degree and second-degree relatives combined (hazard ratio 1.39, 95% CI 1.09-1.77, P = .007) were at greater risk despite controlling for the above socioeconomic factors.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides further support that genetic factors may underlie PJI as we did observe significant familial risk even after accounting for socioeconomic factors and payer status. We did not find a correlation between education level or household income and PJI; however, Medicaid payees were at increased risk. Continued study is needed to define a possible heritable disposition to PJI in an effort to optimize treatment and possibly prevent this complication.

摘要

背景

假体周围关节感染(PJI)是全关节置换术后一种毁灭性的并发症,给个人和社会带来了巨大的经济和个人负担。本研究的目的是使用已建立的数据库来分析社会经济变量,并评估其与 PJI 的关系。此外,我们还试图评估在统计模型中控制其他已知的 PJI 危险因素后,社会经济因素是否以及如何影响 PJI 的家族风险。

方法

我们在全州范围内的数据库中进行了一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1996 年 1 月至 2013 年 12 月期间所有髋关节或膝关节初次全关节置换术的患者(n=85332)。我们排除了 9854 名年龄<18 岁、数据缺失、索引手术前有 PJI 病史或无 2 年随访证据(不包括有 PJI 的患者)的患者。将索引手术后发生 PJI 的患者(n=2282)与未发生 PJI 的患者(n=73196)进行比较。

结果

在调整了协变量后,以医疗补助为主要支付方式的患者发生 PJI 的风险更高(相对风险 1.40,95%置信区间[CI]为 1.08-1.82,P=0.01)。在与教育程度或家庭收入中位数相关的组之间,风险没有差异(均 P>0.05)。PJI 患者的一级亲属(风险比 1.66,95%CI 为 1.23-2.24,P=0.001)和一级亲属和二级亲属(风险比 1.39,95%CI 为 1.09-1.77,P=0.007)的风险更高,尽管控制了上述社会经济因素。

结论

我们的研究进一步支持遗传因素可能是 PJI 的基础,因为即使在考虑了社会经济因素和支付者身份后,我们确实观察到了显著的家族风险。我们没有发现教育程度或家庭收入与 PJI 之间存在相关性;然而,医疗补助的支付者风险增加。需要进一步研究以确定 PJI 的可能遗传性易感性,从而优化治疗并可能预防这种并发症。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Status May Not Be a Risk Factor for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.社会经济地位可能不是人工关节置换术后感染的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1900-1905. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.058. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Prior hip or knee prosthetic joint infection in another joint increases risk three-fold of prosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: a matched control study.原发全膝关节置换术后其他关节既往髋关节或膝关节假体关节感染使假体关节感染风险增加三倍:一项匹配对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):91-97. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1189.R1.
3
A History of Treated Periprosthetic Joint Infection Increases the Risk of Subsequent Different Site Infection.人工关节周围感染治疗史会增加后续不同部位感染的风险。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jul;473(7):2300-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4174-4.
4
Periprosthetic Infection Recurrence After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: Failure or Fate?两阶段翻修关节置换术后假体周围感染复发:是失败还是必然?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
5
Patients with a History of Treated Septic Arthritis are at High Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Total Joint Arthroplasty.治疗过的脓毒性关节炎患者在全关节置换术后发生假体周围关节感染的风险很高。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jul;477(7):1605-1612. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000688.
6
Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 15-Year, Population-Based Cohort Study.初次全髋关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的危险因素:一项长达 15 年的基于人群的队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Mar 18;102(6):503-509. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00537.
7
Trends of Prosthetic Joint Infection Organisms and Recurrence for a Single High-Volume Arthroplasty Surgeon Over 20 Years.20 多年来一位高手术量关节置换外科医生的人工关节感染病原体和复发趋势。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):1101-1108. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Socioeconomic Status Is Associated With the Risk of Girdlestone Resection Arthroplasty After Periprosthetic Infection of the Hip.社会经济地位与髋关节假体周围感染后行 Girdlestone 切除关节成形术的风险相关。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 May 15;29(10):439-445. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00686.
9
Elevated Infection and Complication Rates in Patients Undergoing a Primary THA With a History of a PJI in a Prior Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study.初次髋关节或膝关节置换术后有感染性关节炎病史的患者行初次全髋关节置换术时感染和并发症发生率升高:一项匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul;35(7):1928-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
10
Age alone is not a risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection.年龄本身并不是人工关节周围感染的危险因素。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Sep;103(1):64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative strategies to prevent periprosthetic joint infection after knee replacement: evidence-based recommendations for multidisciplinary practice.膝关节置换术后预防假体周围关节感染的术前策略:多学科实践的循证建议
Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2025 Aug 29;17:143566. doi: 10.52965/001c.143566. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of socioeconomic inequality and risk of periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty: a Danish cohort study of 75,141 cases.社会经济不平等与全膝关节置换术后假体周围关节感染风险的关联:一项对75141例病例的丹麦队列研究
Acta Orthop. 2025 May 19;96:371-379. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2025.43678.
3
Sex-related differences in periprosthetic joint infection research.
人工关节周围感染研究中的性别差异。
J Bone Jt Infect. 2024 Apr 30;9(2):137-142. doi: 10.5194/jbji-9-137-2024. eCollection 2024.
4
Differences in In Vitro Bacterial Adherence between Ti6Al4V and CoCrMo Alloys.Ti6Al4V合金与CoCrMo合金之间的体外细菌黏附差异
Materials (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;16(4):1505. doi: 10.3390/ma16041505.
5
Antibiotics- and Heavy Metals-Based Titanium Alloy Surface Modifications for Local Prosthetic Joint Infections.用于局部人工关节感染的基于抗生素和重金属的钛合金表面改性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;10(10):1270. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101270.