• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克赖斯特彻奇医院采用的一种有说服力的抗菌药物管理方法,通过改用口服阿奇霉素,使静脉注射克拉霉素的剂量和费用持续下降。

A persuasive approach to antimicrobial stewardship in Christchurch hospitals produced a sustained decrease in intravenous clarithromycin dosing and expenditure via a switch to azithromycin orally.

作者信息

Gardiner Sharon J, Metcalf Sarah Cl, Werno Anja, Doogue Matthew P, Chambers Stephen T

机构信息

Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacist, Departments of Infectious Diseases, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch.

Infectious Diseases Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, Christchurch Hospital, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 3;133(1512):22-30.

PMID:32242175
Abstract

AIMS

To assess a persuasive multimodel approach to decreasing unnecessary intravenous (IV) clarithromycin use for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in Canterbury District Health Board (CDHB) hospitals.

METHODS

In December 2013, CDHB guidelines for empiric treatment of CAP changed to prioritise oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin. The multimodel approach we used to implement this change included obtaining stakeholder agreement, improved guidelines access, education and pharmacist support. The impact of the intervention was evaluated by comparing macrolide usage and expenditure for the four years pre- and post-intervention.

RESULTS

Mean annual clarithromycin IV use decreased by 72% from 6.4 to 1.8 defined daily doses (DDDs) per 1,000 occupied bed days (OBDs) post-intervention, while oral azithromycin increased by 833% (4.2 to 39.2 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs). Concurrently, oral clarithromycin use decreased by 91% (32.9 to 2.9 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs), and roxithromycin by 71% (17.0 to 5.0 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs). Mean annual total macrolide use decreased by 21% (68.2 to 53.9 DDDs per 1,000 OBDs), while expenditure decreased by 69% mainly through avoided IV administration.

CONCLUSIONS

A persuasive multimodel approach to support adoption of CAP guidelines produced a sustained decrease in IV clarithromycin use, which may have clinical benefits such as reduced occurrence of catheter-related complications.

摘要

目的

评估一种有说服力的多模式方法,以减少坎特伯雷地区卫生局(CDHB)医院中社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者不必要的静脉注射克拉霉素的使用。

方法

2013年12月,CDHB关于CAP经验性治疗的指南发生了变化,优先选择口服阿奇霉素而非静脉注射克拉霉素。我们用于实施这一变化的多模式方法包括获得利益相关者的同意、改善指南获取途径、开展教育以及药剂师支持。通过比较干预前后四年的大环内酯类药物使用情况和支出,评估该干预措施的影响。

结果

干预后,每1000个占用床位日(OBDs)的克拉霉素静脉使用量从6.4限定日剂量(DDDs)降至1.8 DDDs,年均降幅为72%,而口服阿奇霉素增加了833%(从每1000个OBDs的4.2 DDDs增至39.2 DDDs)。同时,口服克拉霉素的使用量下降了91%(从每1000个OBDs的32.9 DDDs降至2.9 DDDs),罗红霉素下降了71%(从每1000个OBDs的17.0 DDDs降至5.0 DDDs)。年均大环内酯类药物总使用量下降了21%(从每1000个OBDs的68.2 DDDs降至53.9 DDDs),而支出下降了69%,主要是通过避免静脉给药实现的。

结论

一种支持采用CAP指南的有说服力的多模式方法使静脉注射克拉霉素的使用持续减少,这可能具有临床益处,如减少导管相关并发症的发生。

相似文献

1
A persuasive approach to antimicrobial stewardship in Christchurch hospitals produced a sustained decrease in intravenous clarithromycin dosing and expenditure via a switch to azithromycin orally.克赖斯特彻奇医院采用的一种有说服力的抗菌药物管理方法,通过改用口服阿奇霉素,使静脉注射克拉霉素的剂量和费用持续下降。
N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 3;133(1512):22-30.
2
Clinical and bacteriological outcomes in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with azithromycin plus ceftriaxone, or ceftriaxone plus clarithromycin or erythromycin: a prospective, randomised, multicentre study.阿奇霉素联合头孢曲松、或头孢曲松联合克拉霉素或红霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者的临床和细菌学转归:一项前瞻性、随机、多中心研究
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Feb;13(2):162-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01633.x.
3
Single-dose azithromycin microspheres vs clarithromycin extended release for the treatment of mild-to-moderate community-acquired pneumonia in adults.单剂量阿奇霉素微球与克拉霉素缓释剂治疗成人轻至中度社区获得性肺炎的比较
Chest. 2005 Oct;128(4):2230-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.4.2230.
4
A pharmacist-led prospective antibiotic stewardship intervention improves compliance to community-acquired pneumonia guidelines in 39 public and private hospitals across South Africa.药剂师主导的前瞻性抗生素管理干预措施提高了南非 39 家公立和私立医院社区获得性肺炎指南的依从性。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Dec;56(6):106189. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106189. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Metronidazole stewardship initiative at Christchurch hospitals-achievable with immediate benefits.克赖斯特彻奇医院的甲硝唑管理倡议——可实现且能带来即时效益。
N Z Med J. 2018 Apr 13;131(1473):53-58.
6
Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerance of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults.阿奇霉素与克拉霉素治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效及耐受性比较研究
J Chemother. 2004 Feb;16(1):102-3. doi: 10.1179/joc.2004.16.1.102.
7
Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study of the efficacy and tolerability of IV gatifloxacin with the option for oral stepdown gatifloxacin versus IV ceftriaxone (with or without erythromycin or clarithromycin) with the option for oral stepdown clarithromycin for treatment of patients with mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization.一项随机、开放标签、平行组、多中心研究,比较静脉注射加替沙星(可选择口服序贯加替沙星)与静脉注射头孢曲松(加或不加红霉素或克拉霉素)(可选择口服序贯克拉霉素)治疗需要住院的轻至中度社区获得性肺炎患者的疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2003 May;25(5):1453-68. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80132-7.
8
Macrolides versus quinolones in Legionella pneumonia: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization international study.大环内酯类与喹诺酮类在军团菌肺炎中的比较:来自社区获得性肺炎组织国际研究的结果。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Apr;14(4):495-9.
9
The pattern of micro-organisms and the efficacy of new macrolide in acute lower respiratory tract infections.急性下呼吸道感染中微生物的模式及新型大环内酯类药物的疗效。
Respirology. 1998 Jun;3(2):113-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.1998.tb00108.x.
10
Effects of national antibiotic stewardship and infection control strategies on hospital-associated and community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections across a region of Scotland: a non-linear time-series study.国家抗生素管理和感染控制策略对苏格兰某地区医院相关和社区相关耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的影响:一项非线性时间序列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Dec;15(12):1438-49. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00315-1. Epub 2015 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective observational cohort study of oral azithromycin treatment for Legionnaires' disease.一项关于口服阿奇霉素治疗军团病的回顾性观察队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 May 2;80(5):1354-1361. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf081.