• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于口服阿奇霉素治疗军团病的回顾性观察队列研究。

A retrospective observational cohort study of oral azithromycin treatment for Legionnaires' disease.

作者信息

Pairman Lorna, Beh Yong Tai, Maher Hannah, Gardiner Sharon J, Chin Paul, Williman Jonathan, Chambers Stephen T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Department of General Medicine, Te Whatu Ora Health NZ-Waitaha Canterbury, Christchurch Hospital, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 May 2;80(5):1354-1361. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf081.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkaf081
PMID:40116673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12046395/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Legionnaires' disease (LD) is typically treated with macrolides, including the azalide azithromycin, or quinolones. In 2013, guidelines for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand were changed to prioritize oral azithromycin over IV clarithromycin.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the change in antimicrobial guidelines led to altered outcomes for patients subsequently confirmed to have LD.

METHODS

Patients with confirmed LD between 2010 and 2020 were identified from clinical and laboratory data. Hospital records were used to identify mortality, ICU admission, length of hospital stay, time to clinical stability, and time to first anti-Legionella treatment. Mean differences, risk ratios (RRs) and an interrupted time series with propensity adjustment were used to compare patient outcomes before and after the guideline change.

RESULTS

There were 323 patients included: 128 before and 195 after the change. Patient outcomes generally improved after the change including: mortality within 30 days (RR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8); ICU admission (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9); length of stay (difference -2.3 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.4); and time to clinical stability (difference -2.4 days, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5). The interrupted time series analysis suggested improvements in patient outcomes may have occurred regardless of the guideline change.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes for patients with LD were not worsened by the change in antimicrobial guidelines and may have improved. Overall rates of mortality were low. This result was reassuring given the harm that may result from unnecessary use of IV compared with oral antimicrobial agents.

摘要

背景

军团菌病(LD)通常用大环内酯类药物治疗,包括氮杂内酯类阿奇霉素,或喹诺酮类药物。2013年,新西兰克赖斯特彻奇医院社区获得性肺炎经验性治疗指南发生了变化,将口服阿奇霉素置于静脉注射克拉霉素之前优先使用。

目的

确定抗菌药物指南的改变是否导致随后确诊为LD的患者的治疗结果发生变化。

方法

从临床和实验室数据中识别出2010年至2020年期间确诊为LD的患者。利用医院记录确定死亡率、入住重症监护病房(ICU)情况、住院时间、临床稳定时间以及首次抗军团菌治疗时间。采用平均差异、风险比(RRs)以及倾向调整的中断时间序列来比较指南改变前后的患者治疗结果。

结果

共纳入323例患者,其中指南改变前128例,改变后195例。指南改变后患者的治疗结果总体有所改善,包括:30天内死亡率(RR 0.4,95%置信区间0.2 - 0.8);入住ICU情况(RR 0.6,95%置信区间0.5 - 0.9);住院时间(差异 -2.3天,95%置信区间 -4.3至 -0.4);以及临床稳定时间(差异 -2.4天,95%置信区间 -4.3至 -0.5)。中断时间序列分析表明,无论指南是否改变,患者的治疗结果可能都有所改善。

结论

抗菌药物指南的改变并未使LD患者的治疗结果恶化,反而可能有所改善。总体死亡率较低。鉴于与口服抗菌药物相比,静脉注射抗菌药物的不必要使用可能带来危害,这一结果令人安心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e635/12046395/ebb9595f2416/dkaf081f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e635/12046395/7459421f5555/dkaf081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e635/12046395/ebb9595f2416/dkaf081f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e635/12046395/7459421f5555/dkaf081f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e635/12046395/ebb9595f2416/dkaf081f2.jpg

相似文献

1
A retrospective observational cohort study of oral azithromycin treatment for Legionnaires' disease.一项关于口服阿奇霉素治疗军团病的回顾性观察队列研究。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 May 2;80(5):1354-1361. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf081.
2
[Treatment for Legionnaires' disease. Macrolides or quinolones?].[军团病的治疗。大环内酯类药物还是喹诺酮类药物?]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2006 Jun-Jul;24(6):360-4. doi: 10.1157/13089688.
3
Macrolides versus quinolones in Legionella pneumonia: results from the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization international study.大环内酯类与喹诺酮类在军团菌肺炎中的比较:来自社区获得性肺炎组织国际研究的结果。
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2010 Apr;14(4):495-9.
4
Levofloxacin versus azithromycin for treating legionella pneumonia: a propensity score analysis.左氧氟沙星与阿奇霉素治疗军团菌肺炎的比较:倾向评分分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Sep;23(9):653-658. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.030. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
5
Legionella pneumonia in the Niagara Region, Ontario, Canada: a case series.加拿大安大略省尼亚加拉地区的军团菌肺炎:病例系列
J Med Case Rep. 2016 Dec 1;10(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s13256-016-1105-2.
6
Antimicrobial strategy for severe community-acquired legionnaires' disease: a multicentre retrospective observational study.重症社区获得性军团菌病的抗菌策略:一项多中心回顾性观察研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 May 1;72(5):1502-1509. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx007.
7
Azithromycin in the treatment of Legionella pneumonia requiring hospitalization.阿奇霉素治疗需住院的军团菌肺炎。
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Dec 1;37(11):1475-80. doi: 10.1086/379329. Epub 2003 Oct 29.
8
Azithromycin for treatment of community acquired pneumonia caused by Legionella pneumophila: a retrospective study.阿奇霉素治疗嗜肺军团菌引起的社区获得性肺炎:一项回顾性研究。
Scand J Infect Dis. 1995;27(5):503-5. doi: 10.3109/00365549509047054.
9
A Case of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Due to Legionella pneumophila Serogroup 9 Wherein Initial Treatment with Single-Dose Oral Azithromycin Appeared Useful.1例由嗜肺军团菌血清群9引起的社区获得性肺炎,单剂量口服阿奇霉素初始治疗似乎有效。
Jpn J Infect Dis. 2017 Nov 22;70(6):660-662. doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2016.548. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Legionella pneumonia in hospitalized adults with respiratory failure: Quinolones or macrolides?住院合并呼吸衰竭成人患者军团菌肺炎:喹诺酮类或大环内酯类?
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Feb;120:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Legionella gormanii: species-specific ECOFFs, distinct MICs for rifampin versus Legionella pneumophila.戈尔曼军团菌的抗菌药敏性:种属特异性的流行病学截断值,利福平对戈尔曼军团菌与嗜肺军团菌的不同最低抑菌浓度
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2025 Sep 1;24(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12941-025-00813-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Quinolones or macrolides for adults with Legionnaires' disease and respiratory failure?喹诺酮类或大环内酯类药物用于患有军团病和呼吸衰竭的成年人?
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Oct;128:134-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.07.026. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing reveals reduced susceptibility to azithromycin and other antibiotics in Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1 isolates from Portugal.抗微生物药物敏感性测试显示,来自葡萄牙的嗜肺军团菌血清群 1 分离株对阿奇霉素和其他抗生素的敏感性降低。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jul;43(7):1297-1308. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04789-9. Epub 2024 May 2.
3
Legionella pneumonia in hospitalized adults with respiratory failure: Quinolones or macrolides?
住院合并呼吸衰竭成人患者军团菌肺炎:喹诺酮类或大环内酯类?
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Feb;120:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.09.013. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
4
Treatment of legionellosis including a single intravenous dose of 1.5 g azithromycin: 18-year experience at a tertiary care hospital.采用单剂 1.5 克静脉注射阿奇霉素治疗军团菌病:一家三级医院 18 年的经验。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022 Jan;59(1):106481. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106481. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Meta-analysis of fluoroquinolones versus macrolides for treatment of legionella pneumonia.氟喹诺酮类药物与大环内酯类药物治疗军团菌肺炎的荟萃分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Mar;27(3):424-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Are Fluoroquinolones or Macrolides Better for Treating Legionella Pneumonia? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.氟喹诺酮类药物与大环内酯类药物治疗军团菌肺炎哪个效果更佳?一项系统评价与Meta分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 1;72(11):1979-1989. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa441.
7
A persuasive approach to antimicrobial stewardship in Christchurch hospitals produced a sustained decrease in intravenous clarithromycin dosing and expenditure via a switch to azithromycin orally.克赖斯特彻奇医院采用的一种有说服力的抗菌药物管理方法,通过改用口服阿奇霉素,使静脉注射克拉霉素的剂量和费用持续下降。
N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 3;133(1512):22-30.
8
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
9
The burden of Legionnaires' disease in New Zealand (LegiNZ): a national surveillance study.新西兰军团病负担(LegiNZ):一项全国性监测研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):770-777. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30113-6. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical Legionella longbeachae isolates.嗜肺军团菌长滩亚种临床分离株的抗菌药敏性
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Apr 1;73(4):1102-1104. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx484.