Barnett Pauline, Bagshaw Philip
Adjunct Associate Professor, School of Health Sciences, University Canterbury, Christchurch.
Chair, Canterbury Charity Hospital Trust, Christchurch; Clinical Associate Professor, University of Otago, Christchurch.
N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 3;133(1512):76-84.
Since the 1970s, neoliberalism has been the dominant economic and political philosophy among global institutions and some Western governments. Its three main strategies are: privatisation and competitive markets; reduced public expenditure on social services and infrastructure; and deregulation to enhance economic activity and ensure freedom of 'choice'. Generally, these measures have negatively affected the health and wellbeing of communities. In New Zealand, privatisation and competition led to income inequality and an unequal distribution of the 'determinants of health', a burden borne disproportionately by children, the poor, and by Māori and Pacific people. Limiting health expenditure led to inequalities in access to services with restructuring in the 1990s, subverting the service culture of the health system. Failure to regulate for the protection of citizens has undermined health and safety systems, the security of work and collective approaches to health improvement. There has been some retreat from neoliberalism in New Zealand, but we can do more to focus on 'upstream' health initiatives, to recognise that social investment, including adequate funding of services, returns benefits far in excess of any costs, and to make sure that social and cultural equity goals are achieved.
自20世纪70年代以来,新自由主义一直是全球机构和一些西方政府中占主导地位的经济和政治理念。其三大主要策略是:私有化和竞争市场;减少社会服务和基础设施方面的公共支出;以及放松管制以增强经济活动并确保“选择”自由。总体而言,这些措施对社区的健康和福祉产生了负面影响。在新西兰,私有化和竞争导致了收入不平等以及“健康决定因素”的不平等分配,儿童、穷人以及毛利人和太平洋岛民承受了不成比例的负担。限制卫生支出导致20世纪90年代重组后服务获取方面的不平等,颠覆了卫生系统的服务文化。未能进行监管以保护公民,破坏了健康与安全体系、工作安全以及改善健康的集体方式。新西兰在一定程度上已从新自由主义有所退缩,但我们还可以做更多工作,专注于“上游”健康倡议,认识到社会投资,包括对服务的充足资金投入,带来的收益远远超过任何成本,并确保实现社会和文化公平目标。