• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国脑死亡潜在器官捐献者捐献率近期下降及其可能原因。

Recent Decrease in Organ Donation from Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donors in Korea and Possible Causes.

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine and Neurology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Medical Education, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;35(13):e94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e94.

DOI:10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e94
PMID:32242345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7131902/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 1999, the Organ Transplantation Act legalized organ donation from brain-dead patients. As a result of the government's continued efforts, the number of brain-dead donors steadily increased from 2002 through 2016. However, the number has declined since 2017. This paper examined the possible reasons behind the decline in brain-dead organ donation.

METHODS

This investigation was an analysis of published data from the Korea Organ Donation Agency annual reports from 2013 to 2018.

RESULTS

The number of brain-dead organ donors in Korea rose steadily until 2016, declined in 2017 for the first time since 2002, and then dropped sharply in 2018. Although the number of brain-dead potential organ donors increased between 2017 and 2018, the number of eligible donors decreased, suggesting that patient families rejected the brain-death determination process and brain-dead organ donation. Statistics gathered during identification of brain-dead potential donors and actual donations confirm that rejection or withdrawal of consent by the family has increased. During the same period when donation from brain- dead patients decreased, five events occurred: 1) compensation for donor families was abolished; 2) an incident of mistreatment of a brain-dead donor's remains occurred; 3) the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act was enacted, providing a legal procedure whereby families of brain-dead patients could forgo life-sustaining treatment; 4) residents' work week was limited to 80 hours; and 5) the Labor Standards Law was amended.

CONCLUSION

Fewer eligible donors in spite of an increase in brain-dead potential organ donors suggests that reduction in these donations resulted mainly from factors associated with family consent. Among such factors, implementation of the Life-sustaining Treatment Act appears to be most important. Abolition of family compensation and the incident in which a brain-dead donor's remains were mistreated may also have influenced family consent.

摘要

背景

1999 年,《器官移植法》使脑死亡患者的器官捐赠合法化。由于政府的持续努力,脑死亡供体的数量从 2002 年到 2016 年稳步增加。然而,自 2017 年以来,这一数字有所下降。本文旨在探讨脑死亡器官捐献减少的可能原因。

方法

本研究分析了 2013 年至 2018 年韩国器官捐赠管理局年度报告中的已发表数据。

结果

韩国脑死亡器官捐献者数量在 2016 年之前稳步上升,2017 年首次出现下降,2018 年急剧下降。尽管 2017 年至 2018 年脑死亡潜在器官捐献者数量有所增加,但符合条件的捐献者数量却有所减少,这表明患者家属拒绝了脑死亡判定过程和脑死亡器官捐献。在脑死亡潜在供体识别和实际捐献过程中收集的统计数据证实,拒绝或撤回家属同意的情况有所增加。在脑死亡患者捐献减少的同期,发生了五起事件:1)取消对捐献者家属的补偿;2)发生一起脑死亡捐献者遗体受虐待事件;3)《维持生命治疗法》颁布,为脑死亡患者家属提供了放弃维持生命治疗的法律程序;4)居民每周工作时间限制为 80 小时;5)《劳动标准法》修订。

结论

尽管脑死亡潜在器官捐献者数量增加,但符合条件的捐献者数量减少,这表明这些捐献减少主要归因于与家属同意相关的因素。在这些因素中,《维持生命治疗法》的实施似乎最为重要。取消家属补偿和脑死亡捐献者遗体受虐待事件也可能影响了家属的同意。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27e/7131902/0a8e95c3f446/jkms-35-e94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27e/7131902/8cea923b11d4/jkms-35-e94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27e/7131902/0a8e95c3f446/jkms-35-e94-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27e/7131902/8cea923b11d4/jkms-35-e94-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f27e/7131902/0a8e95c3f446/jkms-35-e94-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Recent Decrease in Organ Donation from Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donors in Korea and Possible Causes.韩国脑死亡潜在器官捐献者捐献率近期下降及其可能原因。
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;35(13):e94. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e94.
2
Availability of transplantable organs from brain stem dead donors in intensive care units.重症监护病房中脑干死亡供体可用于移植的器官情况。
BMJ. 1991 Jan 19;302(6769):149-53. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6769.149.
3
Causes of Failure during the Management Process from Identification of Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donors to Actual Donation in Korea: a 5-Year Data Analysis (2012-2016).韩国脑死亡潜在器官捐献者识别至实际捐献管理过程失败原因的 5 年数据分析(2012-2016 年)。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Nov 26;33(50):e326. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e326. eCollection 2018 Dec 10.
4
Organ donation from brain-dead and circulatory-dead donors: single-institution experiences.脑死亡和循环死亡供体的器官捐献:单机构经验
Transplant Proc. 2014 May;46(4):1051-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.11.064.
5
Brain death and organ donation in Germany: analysis of procurement in a neurosurgical unit and review of press reports.德国的脑死亡与器官捐献:神经外科单位的获取分析及新闻报道综述
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(6):641-5; discussion 645-6. doi: 10.1007/s007010050354.
6
Organ Donation from Donors with Hepatitis B or C in South Korea: A 2013-2017 Nationwide Data Analysis.韩国 2013-2017 年全国范围内乙型肝炎或丙型肝炎供体的器官捐献:数据分析。
Ann Transplant. 2021 Apr 30;26:e928947. doi: 10.12659/AOT.928947.
7
Independent organ donor facilities: The future of organ donation?独立器官捐赠机构:器官捐赠的未来?
Ann Ital Chir. 2014 Nov-Dec;85(6):616-7.
8
Satisfaction with the organ donation process of brain dead donors' families in Korea.韩国脑死亡捐赠者家属对器官捐赠过程的满意度。
Transplant Proc. 2014 Dec;46(10):3253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.09.094.
9
The organ transplantation act and recent trends in Korea.器官移植法案和韩国的最新趋势。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2013 Mar;25(2):209-13. doi: 10.1177/1010539513476935.
10
Implementing of Active Brain-Dead Donor Identification Strategy in a Single Donor Center: One Year Experience.在单一供者中心实施主动脑死亡供者识别策略:一年经验。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Jul 22;56(8):366. doi: 10.3390/medicina56080366.

引用本文的文献

1
Attitude and concerns of healthy individuals regarding post-mortem brain donation. A qualitative study on a nation-wide sample in Italy.健康个体对死后大脑捐赠的态度和关注点。意大利全国范围内的定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 27;24(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00980-3.
2
Recent Trends in the Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment in Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Disease : 2017-2021.2017 - 2021年急性脑血管病患者生命维持治疗撤除的近期趋势
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024 Jan;67(1):73-83. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0074. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
The Incidence of Brain-Dead Donors Based on Screening and Management Led by Intensivists.

本文引用的文献

1
Causes of Failure during the Management Process from Identification of Brain-Dead Potential Organ Donors to Actual Donation in Korea: a 5-Year Data Analysis (2012-2016).韩国脑死亡潜在器官捐献者识别至实际捐献管理过程失败原因的 5 年数据分析(2012-2016 年)。
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Nov 26;33(50):e326. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e326. eCollection 2018 Dec 10.
2
Organ trafficking and transplant tourism and commercialism: the Declaration of Istanbul.器官贩卖、移植旅游与商业化:《伊斯坦布尔宣言》
Lancet. 2008 Jul 5;372(9632):5-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60967-8.
基于由重症监护医生主导的筛查和管理的脑死亡供者的发生率。
Ann Transplant. 2023 May 2;28:e939521. doi: 10.12659/AOT.939521.
4
Brain Donation Decisions as Disease Specific Behaviors: An Elucidation of the Donation Process in the Context of Essential Tremor.脑捐赠决策作为疾病特异性行为:在原发性震颤背景下对捐赠过程的阐明。
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2022 Aug 23;12:25. doi: 10.5334/tohm.704. eCollection 2022.
5
Exploring the experiences and perspectives of emergency physicians on brain death organ tissue donation after the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act.探索《维持生命治疗决策法》实施后急诊医生在脑死亡器官组织捐赠方面的经历和观点。
Korean J Transplant. 2022 Mar 31;36(1):29-36. doi: 10.4285/kjt.22.0005.
6
Brain Death and Its Prediction in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Treated with Targeted Temperature Management.院外心脏骤停患者接受目标温度管理时的脑死亡及其预测
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 10;12(5):1190. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051190.
7
Analysis of Factors Affecting Emergency Physicians' Attitudes toward Deceased Organ & Tissue Donation.影响急诊医师对器官和组织捐献态度因素的分析。
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Dec 20;36(49):e329. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e329.